Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
National Center for International Research on Green Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 26;11(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01286-0.
Compared to nonsocial information, the human brain is more highly sensitive to social information. As a kind of typical social semantic information, the words describing person traits differ from the nonsocial semantic information describing inanimate objects in many ways. It remains to be seen whether the processing of trait words has a valence asymmetric and whether it differs from the processing of nonsocial semantic information in terms of behavioral responses and neural temporal processes.
Taking person and object names as priming stimuli and adjective words only used for describing humans or objects as target stimuli, the present study aimed to investigate the processing characteristics of social and nonsocial semantic information by recording both behavioral and ERP data.
Behavioral results showed that the response times for negative words were significantly slower than those for positive words whether for social or nonsocial semantic information. The accuracy rates of negative words were significantly lower than those of positive words when the targets were social words which is contrary to the nonsocial words. The ERP results indicated that there was a negative bias effect on the processing of both types of information during the whole time course of brain neural activity; that is, the P2, N400, and LPP amplitudes elicited by negative words were larger than those elicited by positive words; However, the negative bias effect of social semantic information started at the early perceptual stage which was significantly earlier than the onset of negative bias of nonsocial semantic information, and was significantly affected by the prime type. In addition, there was a significant semantic conflict N400 effect only for nonsocial semantic information.
Overall, the present study revealed the existence of an early negative bias of social information and provided evidence for the specificity of social information.
与非社交信息相比,大脑对社交信息更为敏感。作为一种典型的社会语义信息,描述人物特征的词语在许多方面与描述无生命物体的非社交语义信息不同。特质词的加工是否具有效价不对称性,以及在行为反应和神经时程加工方面是否与非社会语义信息不同,仍有待观察。
本研究以人物和物体名称作为启动刺激,仅将描述人类或物体的形容词作为目标刺激,旨在通过记录行为和 ERP 数据来研究社会和非社会语义信息的处理特征。
行为结果表明,无论是社交还是非社交语义信息,负性词的反应时均显著长于正性词,而负性词的正确率显著低于正性词,当目标是社交词时,这与非社交词相反。ERP 结果表明,在整个脑电活动的时间进程中,两种类型的信息处理均存在负性偏向效应,即负性词诱发的 P2、N400 和 LPP 振幅均大于正性词;然而,社交语义信息的负性偏向效应起始于早期感知阶段,明显早于非社交语义信息的负性偏向效应,且受到启动类型的显著影响。此外,仅对非社会语义信息存在显著的语义冲突 N400 效应。
总体而言,本研究揭示了社会信息存在早期的负性偏向,并为社会信息的特异性提供了证据。