Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Sep;24(9):860-870. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0850.
The intra-parotid facial nerve (FN) can be visualized using three-dimensional double-echo steady-state water-excitation sequence magnetic resonance imaging (3D-DESS-WE-MRI). However, the clinical impact of FN imaging using 3D-DESS-WE-MRI before parotidectomy has not yet been explored. We compared the clinical outcomes of parotidectomy in patients with and without preoperative 3D-DESS-WE-MRI.
This prospective, non-randomized, single-institution study included 296 adult patients who underwent parotidectomy for parotid tumors, excluding superficial and mobile tumors. Preoperative evaluation with 3D-DESS-WE-MRI was performed in 122 patients, and not performed in 174 patients. FN visibility and tumor location relative to FN on 3D-DESS-WE-MRI were evaluated in 120 patients. Rates of FN palsy (FNP) and operation times were compared between patients with and without 3D-DESS-WE-MRI; propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to adjust for surgical and tumor factors.
The main trunk, temporofacial branch, and cervicofacial branch of the intra-parotid FN were identified using 3D-DESS-WE-MRI in approximately 97.5% (117/120), 44.2% (53/120), and 25.0% (30/120) of cases, respectively. The tumor location relative to FN, as assessed on magnetic resonance imaging, concurred with surgical findings in 90.8% (109/120) of cases. Rates of temporary and permanent FNP did not vary between patients with and without 3D-DESS-WE-MRI according to PSM (odds ratio, 2.29 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.64-8.25] and 2.02 [95% CI: 0.32-12.90], respectively) and IPTW (odds ratio, 1.76 [95% CI: 0.19-16.75] and 1.94 [95% CI: 0.20-18.49], respectively). Conversely, operation time for surgical identification of FN was significantly shorter with 3D-DESS-WE-MRI (median, 25 vs. 35 min for PSM and 25 vs. 30 min for IPTW, < 0.001).
Preoperative FN imaging with 3D-DESS-WE-MRI facilitated anatomical identification of FN and its relationship to the tumor during parotidectomy. This modality reduced operation time for FN identification, but did not significantly affect postoperative FNP rates.
腮腺内面神经(FN)可通过三维双回波稳态水激发序列磁共振成像(3D-DESS-WE-MRI)进行可视化。然而,腮腺切除术前行 3D-DESS-WE-MRI 检查对面神经的临床影响尚未得到探索。我们比较了行腮腺切除术的患者中有无术前 3D-DESS-WE-MRI 的临床结果。
这项前瞻性、非随机、单机构研究纳入了 296 例因腮腺肿瘤而行腮腺切除术的成年患者,不包括浅表和活动肿瘤。122 例患者行术前 3D-DESS-WE-MRI 检查,174 例患者未行此检查。120 例患者评估了 3D-DESS-WE-MRI 上 FN 的可视性和肿瘤相对于 FN 的位置。比较了有和无 3D-DESS-WE-MRI 的患者的 FN 瘫痪(FNP)发生率和手术时间;使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和逆概率处理加权(IPTW)调整手术和肿瘤因素。
在大约 97.5%(117/120)、44.2%(53/120)和 25.0%(30/120)的病例中,3D-DESS-WE-MRI 分别识别了腮腺内 FN 的主干、颞面支和颈面支。在 120 例病例中,磁共振成像上评估的肿瘤相对于 FN 的位置与手术发现一致的比例为 90.8%(109/120)。根据 PSM(比值比,2.29[95%置信区间{CI}:0.64-8.25]和 2.02[95%CI:0.32-12.90])和 IPTW(比值比,1.76[95%CI:0.19-16.75]和 1.94[95%CI:0.20-18.49]),有和无 3D-DESS-WE-MRI 的患者之间临时和永久性 FNP 发生率没有差异。相反,使用 3D-DESS-WE-MRI 对面神经进行手术识别时,手术时间显著缩短(PSM 中位数,25 分钟比 35 分钟,IPTW 中位数,25 分钟比 30 分钟,均 < 0.001)。
腮腺切除术前行 3D-DESS-WE-MRI 对面神经成像有助于在手术中对面神经及其与肿瘤的关系进行解剖学识别。该方法减少了 FN 识别的手术时间,但并未显著影响术后 FNP 发生率。