Finlay Jessica, Jang Joy, Esposito Michael, McClure Leslie, Judd Suzanne, Clarke Philippa
Social Environment and Health, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, 48104.
Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, 48109.
Urban Stud. 2023 Jan;60(1):85-108. doi: 10.1177/00420980221089582. Epub 2022 May 25.
Neighborhoods are fluid social and spatial constructs that vary by person and place. How do residential neighborhoods shift as people age? This mixed-method study investigates how perceived neighborhood boundaries and size vary by individual and contextual characteristics. Semi-structured interviews with 125 adults aged 55-92 living in the Minneapolis (Minnesota) metropolitan area suggested that neighborhood boundaries are "fuzzy". Qualitative thematic analysis identified duration of residence and housing stability, race, life-space mobility, social capital, sense of safety, and the built and social environment as key neighborhood determinants. This informed quantitative analyses among 7,811 respondents (mean age 72) from the (REGARDS) Study who self-reported how many blocks composed their neighborhoods. We tested individual and contextual factors identified in the qualitative results as related to perceived neighborhood size. Three-level gamma regression models showed that being older, white, less educated, lower income, less physically and cognitively healthy, less active, less socially supported, and feeling unsafe were significantly associated with smaller self-reported neighborhood sizes. Further, living in less racially diverse, less dense, and less affluent areas were significantly associated with smaller neighborhoods. The mixed-methods findings deepen understanding of scale in neighborhood-based research, inform urban planning interventions, and help understand what "neighborhood" means among diverse aging Americans.
社区是流动的社会和空间结构,因人而异、因地而异。随着人们年龄的增长,居住社区会发生怎样的变化?这项混合方法研究调查了人们所感知的社区边界和规模如何因个人及背景特征而有所不同。对明尼阿波利斯(明尼苏达州)大都市区125名年龄在55至92岁之间的成年人进行的半结构化访谈表明,社区边界是“模糊的”。定性主题分析确定了居住时长和住房稳定性、种族、生活空间流动性、社会资本、安全感以及建筑和社会环境是社区的关键决定因素。这为对来自 REGARDS 研究的7811名受访者(平均年龄72岁)进行的定量分析提供了依据,这些受访者自行报告了他们所在社区由多少个街区组成。我们测试了定性结果中确定的与所感知的社区规模相关的个人和背景因素。三级伽马回归模型显示,年龄较大、白人、受教育程度较低、收入较低、身体和认知健康状况较差、活动较少、社会支持较少以及感觉不安全与自我报告的社区规模较小显著相关。此外,居住在种族多样性较低、密度较低和富裕程度较低的地区与较小的社区显著相关。混合方法研究结果加深了对基于社区的研究中规模的理解,为城市规划干预提供了信息,并有助于理解“社区”在不同老年美国人中的含义。