• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整块经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术对临床、病理及肿瘤学结局的影响:一项队列研究

The Impact of En-bloc Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour on Clinical, Pathological and Oncological Outcomes: A Cohort Study.

作者信息

Kannan Deerush, Sekaran Praveen G, Sankaran Sindhu, Taur Pratik, J Sanjay Prakash, Paul Rajesh, Thangarasu Mathisekaran, Jain Nitesh

机构信息

Urology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND.

General Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 26;15(7):e42523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42523. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.42523
PMID:37637640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10457497/
Abstract

Background En-bloc transurethral resection of bladder tissue (ETURBT) has recently been proposed as a good alternative technique to trans-urethral resection of bladder tissue (TURBT) in terms of outcomes for bladder carcinoma. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the technique in terms of clinical, pathological and oncological outcomes. Methodology In this prospective study, data was collected from patients who underwent ETURBT for bladder space-occupying lesions between June 2021 and June 2022. Demographic characteristics, tumour characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Results A total of 52 patients were studied with the majority being male and a mean age of 50.87 years. Smoking was recorded in 22 (38.5%) patients and 8 (15.4%) were on antiplatelet therapy. The majority fell in the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I (59.6%). Most of the tumours were solitary (90.4%), primary (82.8%), papillary architecture (73.1%), and between 1-3 cm in size. The lateral wall was the most common position, and detrusor muscle was seen in 98.1% of the specimens. T1 stage (57.7%) and low grade (67.3%) were the common characteristics noted. 76.9% of the ETURBT was conducted using monopolar cautery. Recurrence was noted in 3 (5.8%) and bladder perforation in 1 patient (1.9%). Cautery artifact was seen in six patients (11.5%) and obturator jerk in nine patients (17.3%). Conclusion Our study suggests that ETURBT is a technique with a good success rate for bladder tumours less than 3 cm in size. The benefits include high chances of detrusor sampling while minimising crush artefacts and cautery damage. Specimen retrieval was challenging when the bladder tumour was solid and over 2 cm.

摘要

背景 整块经尿道膀胱组织切除术(ETURBT)最近被提出,就膀胱癌的治疗效果而言,它是经尿道膀胱组织切除术(TURBT)的一种良好替代技术。本研究旨在评估该技术在临床、病理和肿瘤学方面的有效性。方法 在这项前瞻性研究中,收集了2021年6月至2022年6月期间因膀胱占位性病变接受ETURBT的患者的数据。记录人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征和术后结果。结果 共研究了52例患者,大多数为男性,平均年龄50.87岁。22例(38.5%)患者有吸烟史,8例(15.4%)患者接受抗血小板治疗。大多数患者属于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I级(59.6%)。大多数肿瘤为单发(90.4%)、原发性(82.8%)、乳头状结构(73.1%),大小在1 - 3厘米之间。侧壁是最常见的位置,98.1%的标本可见逼尿肌。常见特征为T1期(57.7%)和低级别(67.3%)。76.9%的ETURBT使用单极电灼进行。3例(5.8%)出现复发,1例(1.9%)患者发生膀胱穿孔。6例患者(11.5%)出现电灼伪像,9例患者(17.3%)出现闭孔肌反射。结论 我们的研究表明,ETURBT对于小于3厘米的膀胱肿瘤是一种成功率较高的技术。其优点包括获取逼尿肌样本的机会高,同时将挤压伪像和电灼损伤降至最低。当膀胱肿瘤为实性且超过2厘米时,标本获取具有挑战性。

相似文献

1
The Impact of En-bloc Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour on Clinical, Pathological and Oncological Outcomes: A Cohort Study.整块经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术对临床、病理及肿瘤学结局的影响:一项队列研究
Cureus. 2023 Jul 26;15(7):e42523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42523. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Cold en bloc excision (CEBE) of bladder tumours using Zedd excision scissors: a prospective, pilot, safety and feasibility study.使用Zedd切除剪刀对膀胱肿瘤进行整块冷切除(CEBE):一项前瞻性、试点、安全性和可行性研究。
Ther Adv Urol. 2020 Nov 29;12:1756287220972230. doi: 10.1177/1756287220972230. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
3
Comparison Of Recurrence Rate Between "EN BLOC" Resection Of Bladder Tumour And Conventional Technique For Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.膀胱肿瘤整块切除术与非肌层浸润性膀胱癌常规技术的复发率比较。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(4):435-440.
4
Transurethral en bloc resection with monopolar current for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer based on TNM system.基于TNM系统的经尿道单极电流整块切除治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;9(4):2210-2219. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.48.
5
Comparison of the efficacy and feasibility of en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor versus conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A meta-analysis.整块经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的疗效及可行性比较:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(45):e5372. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005372.
6
Does En-bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor give a better yield in terms of presence of detrusor muscle in the biopsy specimen?就活检标本中是否存在逼尿肌而言,整块经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的取材效果是否更好?
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jul;28(3):275-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.102700.
7
En-bloc resection of urinary bladder tumour - a prospective controlled multicentre observational study.膀胱肿瘤整块切除术——一项前瞻性对照多中心观察性研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):145-150. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.95399. Epub 2020 May 15.
8
An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting.国际协作共识声明:整块切除膀胱肿瘤,包含两项系统评价、两轮德尔菲调查和一次共识会议。
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):546-569. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.059. Epub 2020 May 8.
9
Green-light laser en bloc resection for primary non-muscle-invasive bladder tumor versus transurethral electroresection: A prospective, nonrandomized two-center trial with 36-month follow-up.绿光激光整块切除治疗原发性非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤与经尿道电切术的比较:一项前瞻性、非随机双中心试验及36个月随访
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Nov;48(9):859-865. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22565. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Transurethral en bloc resection with bipolar button electrode for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.经尿道使用双极纽扣电极整块切除非肌层浸润性膀胱癌。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Apr;50(4):619-623. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1830-0. Epub 2018 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Energy source comparison in en-bloc resection of bladder tumors: subanalysis of a single-center prospective randomized study.膀胱肿瘤整块切除术的能源比较:单中心前瞻性随机研究的亚分析。
World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2591-2597. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04042-y. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumors: A review of current techniques.整块经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术:当前技术综述
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 May;16(5):E287-E293. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7539.
3
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ).欧洲泌尿外科学会非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(Ta、T1和原位癌)指南
Eur Urol. 2022 Jan;81(1):75-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
4
Holmium Laser En-bloc Resection Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors for Treatment of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.钬激光整块切除术与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的随机临床试验。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1035-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
5
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour: The Neglected Procedure in the Technology Race in Bladder Cancer.经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术:膀胱癌技术竞赛中被忽视的程序。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):669-670. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Spotlight on gender-specific disparities in bladder cancer.聚焦膀胱癌的性别特异性差异。
Urologia. 2020 Aug;87(3):103-114. doi: 10.1177/0391560319887327. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
7
The rational and benefits of the second look transurethral resection of the bladder for T1 high grade bladder cancer.T1期高级别膀胱癌二期经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的合理性及益处
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Feb;8(1):46-53. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.10.19.
8
Bladder cancer demographics and outcome data from 2013 at a tertiary cancer hospital in India.印度一家三级癌症医院2013年膀胱癌的人口统计学和预后数据。
Indian J Cancer. 2019 Jan-Mar;56(1):54-58. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_351_18.
9
En bloc resection improves the identification of muscularis mucosae in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.整块切除提高非肌层浸润性膀胱癌中黏膜肌层的识别率。
World J Urol. 2019 Dec;37(12):2677-2682. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02672-3. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
10
Smoking intensity and bladder cancer aggressiveness at diagnosis.吸烟强度与膀胱癌诊断时的侵袭性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 23;13(3):e0194039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194039. eCollection 2018.