Pradas Francisco, Toro-Román Víctor, Castellar Carlos, Carrasco Luis
ENFYRED Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain.
Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 11;14:1243135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243135. eCollection 2023.
Serve and return of the serve are among the most critical technical-tactical factors influencing performance in table tennis (TT). The present study aimed to analyse sex differences in the spatial distribution of serve and serve-return in elite TT players. A total of 48 elite TT players (men: = 24; women: = 24) participated in the investigation. A total of 24 matches were recorded and examined, analysing 1,177 plays and 5,319 strokes in the men's competition and 950 games and 5,097 strokes in the women's competition. Technical actions were analysed using an observation tool validated by two expert TT coach with a high level of agreement ( > 0.80). Men distributed their serves over zones 1 and 2 of the table, while women more frequently selected zone 5 ( < 0.05). In men, 30.1% of the serves were near the net, 63.6% in the middle zone of the table and 6.2% in the end zone of the table, while in women, these values were 10.9%, 67.2%, and 21.8%, respectively. As for the technique of the serve-return depending on the zone of the service, in men the action of the cut from zone 1 and 2 predominated, while in women this technique was more frequent from zone 5 ( < 0.05). On the other hand, the serve-return with the flip technique in zone 1, 3 and 4 was more frequent in men ( < 0.05). As for the return of the serve with the topspin technique, there were differences in zone 3, being more frequent in men ( < 0.05). Finally, the serve return with cut and defensive serve-return techniques in zones 3, 4, 5, and 6 were more frequent in women ( < 0.05). There are differences between sexes in service and return of serve actions during a match in elite players.
发球和接发球是影响乒乓球(TT)比赛表现的最关键技术战术因素之一。本研究旨在分析精英乒乓球运动员发球和接发球空间分布的性别差异。共有48名精英乒乓球运动员(男性:=24名;女性:=24名)参与了调查。共记录并检查了24场比赛,分析了男子比赛中的1177次击球和5319次击球动作,以及女子比赛中的950次击球和5097次击球动作。使用由两名高水平一致性(>0.80)的专业乒乓球教练验证的观察工具对技术动作进行分析。男性将发球分布在球台的1区和2区,而女性更频繁地选择5区(<0.05)。在男性中,30.1%的发球靠近球网,63.6%在球台中间区域,6.2%在球台末端区域,而在女性中,这些值分别为10.9%、67.2%和21.8%。至于根据发球区域的接发球技术,在男性中,来自1区和2区的削球动作占主导,而在女性中,这种技术在5区更频繁(<0.05)。另一方面,男性在1区、3区和4区使用挑打技术接发球更为频繁(<0.05)。至于使用弧圈球技术接发球,在3区存在差异,男性更为频繁(<0.05)。最后,女性在3区、4区、5区和6区使用削球和防守性接发球技术接发球更为频繁(<0.05)。精英运动员在比赛中发球和接发球动作存在性别差异。