Loughran C F
Radiology. 1986 Nov;161(2):455-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763918.
A comparative trial of ioxaglate sodium meglumine and iopamidol in excretory urography was undertaken. The study failed to demonstrate any statistically significant differences between the two media in terms of urographic quality. Diagnostically adequate urograms were obtained in 92.6% of patients receiving ioxaglate and 89.6% of patients receiving iopamidol. There were no intermediate, major, or fatal reactions with either media. Minor reactions were slightly more common with ioxaglate. Both media are good, safe urographic agents, and either can be advocated when excretory urography with low-osmolar agents is indicated.
进行了一项关于碘克沙醇葡甲胺和碘帕醇在排泄性尿路造影中的对比试验。该研究未能证明两种造影剂在尿路造影质量方面存在任何统计学上的显著差异。接受碘克沙醇的患者中有92.6%获得了诊断性足够的尿路造影片,接受碘帕醇的患者中有89.6%获得了诊断性足够的尿路造影片。两种造影剂均未出现中度、重度或致命反应。碘克沙醇的轻微反应略为常见。两种造影剂都是良好、安全的尿路造影剂,当需要使用低渗造影剂进行排泄性尿路造影时,两种造影剂均可推荐使用。