Meinlschmidt Gunther, Grossert Astrid, Meffert Cornelia, Roemmel Noa, Hess Viviane, Rochlitz Christoph, Pless Miklos, Hunziker Sabina, Wössmer Brigitta, Geuter Ulfried, Schaefert Rainer
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Aug 28;9:e38515. doi: 10.2196/38515.
Cancer is related to not only physical but also mental suffering. Notably, body image disturbances are highly relevant to cancer-related changes often persisting beyond recovery from cancer. Scalable and low-barrier interventions that can be blended with face-to-face psychotherapy for cancer survivors are highly warranted.
The aim of the study is to investigate whether smartphone-based bodily interventions are more effective to improve the mood of patients with cancer than smartphone-based fairy tale interventions (control intervention).
We recruited patients with cancer in 2 Swiss hospitals and conducted daily, fully automated smartphone-based interventions 6 times a week for 5 consecutive weeks, blended with weekly face-to-face group body psychotherapy. We applied 2 types of smartphone-based interventions using a within-subject design, randomly assigning patients daily to either bodily interventions or fairy tales. Each intervention type was presented 3 times a week. For this secondary analysis, 3-level mixed models were estimated with mood assessed by the 3 Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire subscales for good-bad mood, wakefulness, and calmness as key indicators. In addition, the effects on experience of presence, vitality, and burden assessed with visual analog scales were investigated.
Based on the data from s=732 interventions performed by 36 participants, good-bad mood improved (β=.27; 95% CI 0.062-0.483), and participants became calmer (β=.98; 95% CI 0.740-1.211) following smartphone-based interventions. Wakefulness did not significantly change from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention (β=.17; 95% CI -0.081 to 0.412). This was true for both intervention types. There was no interaction effect of intervention type with change in good-bad mood (β=-.01; 95% CI -0.439 to 0.417), calmness (β=.22; 95% CI -0.228 to 0.728), or wakefulness (β=.14; 95% CI -0.354 to 0.644). Experience of presence (β=.34; 95% CI 0.271-0.417) and vitality (β=.35; 95% CI 0.268-0.426) increased from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention, while experience of burden decreased (β=-0.40; 95% CI -0.481 to 0.311). Again, these effects were present for both intervention types. There were no significant interaction effects of intervention type with pre- to postintervention changes in experience of presence (β=.14; 95% CI -0.104 to 0.384), experience of vitality (β=.06; 95% CI -0.152 to 0.265), and experience of burden (β=-.16; 95% CI -0.358 to 0.017).
Our results suggest that both smartphone-based audio-guided bodily interventions and fairy tales have the potential to improve the mood of cancer survivors.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03707548; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03707548.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s40359-019-0357-1.
癌症不仅关乎身体痛苦,也涉及精神折磨。值得注意的是,身体形象障碍与癌症相关变化高度相关,且这些变化往往在癌症康复后仍持续存在。因此,非常有必要开发可扩展且门槛低的干预措施,并将其与针对癌症幸存者的面对面心理治疗相结合。
本研究旨在调查基于智能手机的身体干预措施在改善癌症患者情绪方面是否比基于智能手机的童话故事干预措施(对照干预)更有效。
我们在瑞士的两家医院招募了癌症患者,连续5周每周6天进行基于智能手机的每日全自动干预,并结合每周一次的面对面团体身体心理治疗。我们采用受试者内设计应用两种基于智能手机的干预措施,每天随机将患者分配到身体干预或童话故事干预组。每种干预类型每周呈现3次。在本次二次分析中,我们使用3个多维情绪问卷分量表评估的情绪(以好坏情绪、清醒度和平静度为关键指标)来估计三级混合模型。此外,我们还研究了视觉模拟量表评估的临场感、活力和负担体验方面的影响。
根据36名参与者进行的732次干预数据,基于智能手机的干预后,好坏情绪得到改善(β = 0.27;95%置信区间0.062 - 0.483),参与者变得更加平静(β = 0.98;95%置信区间0.740 - 1.211)。基于智能手机的干预前后,清醒度没有显著变化(β = 0.17;95%置信区间 - 0.081至0.412)。两种干预类型均如此。干预类型与好坏情绪变化(β = - 0.01;95%置信区间 - 0.439至0.417)、平静度变化(β = 0.22;95%置信区间 - 0.228至0.728)或清醒度变化(β = 0.14;95%置信区间 - 0.354至0.644)之间均无交互作用。基于智能手机的干预前后,临场感体验(β = 0.34;95%置信区间0.271 - 0.417)和活力体验(β = 0.35;95%置信区间0.268 - 0.426)增加,而负担体验下降(β = - 0.40;95%置信区间 - 0.481至0.311)。同样,两种干预类型均呈现这些效果。干预类型与干预前后临场感体验变化(β = 0.14;95%置信区间 - 0.104至0.384)、活力体验变化(β = 0.06;95%置信区间 - 0.152至0.265)和负担体验变化(β = - 0.16;95%置信区间 - 0.358至0.017)之间均无显著交互作用。
我们的结果表明,基于智能手机的音频引导身体干预措施和童话故事干预措施都有可能改善癌症幸存者的情绪。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03707548;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03707548。
国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):RR2 - 10.1186/s40359 - 019 - 0357 - 1。