Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Växa Sverige, SE-521 40 Falköping, Sweden.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Oct;106(10):7220-7239. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23499. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
The benefits of feeding calves more milk are increasingly being recognized by dairy farmers. However, most producers have still not implemented higher feeding plans. The aim of the present study was to gain a deeper understanding of farmer and farm staff attitudes, and the perceptions and factors considered in their decision-making regarding daily milk allowances. We collected data through focus group interviews with dairy farmers, farm managers, and calf-care workers who were selected using purposive and snowball sampling. In total, 40 persons (24 women and 16 men) joined a focus group interview (6 in all, each with 5-8 participants). Interviews were recorded, and recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Participants had contrasting opinions about the minimum, maximum, and recommended daily milk allowances to their calves. Their suggested lowest daily milk allowance to sustain animal welfare ranged from 4 to 8-10 L and the maximum allowance from 6 to 15 L. We found that farmers' and farm staff's choices and recommendations of milk-feeding protocols were influenced by a large number of factors that could be grouped into 4 themes: (1) Life beyond work, (2) Farm facilities and equipment, (3) Care of the calves, and (4) Profitability and production. Participants' considerations were similar and aimed to maximize daily milk allowance based on farm conditions. However, the allowances they described as optimal for their calves often differed from what they considered practically feasible. We found that the care of the calves and the well-being of the owners and the staff was central in the participants' decision-making, but that this care perspective was challenged by the social and economic sustainability of the farm. Most participants fed their calves twice daily and did not think that increasing that number would be practically feasible. Our results indicate that the participants' viewpoints regarding calves were important for their decision-making about milk allowances. We suggest that a more holistic perspective should be used when advising farmers about milk allowances, putting particular emphasis on the caring and social sustainability aspects of the individual farm.
奶牛养殖户越来越认识到给犊牛喂更多牛奶的好处。然而,大多数生产者仍未实施更高的喂养计划。本研究的目的是更深入地了解农民和农场工作人员的态度,以及他们在决定犊牛每日牛奶供应时的看法和考虑因素。我们通过对奶牛养殖户、农场经理和犊牛护理人员的焦点小组访谈收集数据,这些人员是通过目的性和滚雪球抽样选择的。共有 40 人(24 名女性和 16 名男性)参加了焦点小组访谈(总共 6 组,每组 5-8 名参与者)。访谈进行了录音,录音被转录并进行了主题分析。参与者对他们的犊牛最低、最高和推荐的每日牛奶供应量有不同的看法。他们建议维持动物福利的最低日牛奶供应量为 4-8-10 升,最高供应量为 6-15 升。我们发现,农民和农场工作人员对牛奶喂养方案的选择和建议受到许多因素的影响,这些因素可以分为 4 个主题:(1)工作之外的生活,(2)农场设施和设备,(3)犊牛护理,(4)盈利能力和生产。参与者的考虑因素相似,旨在根据农场条件最大限度地提高每日牛奶供应量。然而,他们认为对犊牛最理想的供应量往往与他们认为实际可行的供应量不同。我们发现,犊牛的护理以及农场主和工作人员的福祉是参与者决策的核心,但这种护理视角受到农场的社会和经济可持续性的挑战。大多数参与者每天给犊牛喂两次奶,他们认为增加喂养次数在实践上是不可行的。我们的研究结果表明,参与者对犊牛的看法对他们关于牛奶供应量的决策很重要。我们建议,在向农民提供关于牛奶供应量的建议时,应采用更全面的视角,特别强调个别农场的关怀和社会可持续性方面。