College of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2024 Jan-Feb;69(1):9-16. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13560. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
Prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, studies of innovative telehealth perinatal care models showed similar clinical outcomes and perceived quality of care between groups receiving a combination of virtual video and in-person visits. However, these studies included primarily White, English-speaking participants, excluding those who were economically disenfranchised or did not speak English. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe perinatal patients' and providers' experiences with telehealth during and after the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic to inform future utilization of telehealth to drive the delivery of high-quality, accessible, and equitable perinatal care to diverse communities.
This descriptive qualitative study included a purposive sample of 14 patients and 17 providers who received or provided perinatal care via telehealth in either a certified nurse-midwifery practice or the nurse-family partnership care model between March 2020 and April 2022. Maximum variation sampling offered a diverse population based on race, ethnicity, and rurality. Researchers conducted 2 rounds of semistructured interviews with a focus on understanding social and geographic context.
Six themes were identified through inductive analysis: (1) unexpected advantages of telehealth, (2) patient empowerment, (3) providers' fear of adverse outcomes, (4) concern for equitable care, (5) strategies to enhance the telehealth experience, and (6) strategies to address access to perinatal telehealth. Patients appreciated the increased ease and reduced cost of accessing visits, which led to fewer missed appointments. Health care providers saw great opportunity in telehealth but expressed concerns about accessibility for patients with language barriers or limited resources.
This study provides insight into priorities for continued telehealth utilization focused on providing equitable access to perinatal care. Rather than returning to practices from before the COVID-19 pandemic formed from longstanding routines and perceived limitations, providers are encouraged to capitalize on the rapid innovations in telehealth to build a more effective, equitable, and patient-centered approach to perinatal care.
在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之前,创新性远程围产保健模式的研究表明,接受虚拟视频和面对面访问相结合的两组人群的临床结局和感知护理质量相似。然而,这些研究主要包括白人、英语使用者,排除了经济上处于不利地位或不会说英语的人。本定性研究的目的是描述 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后远程围产保健的围产患者和提供者的经验,为未来利用远程医疗提供高质量、可及和公平的围产保健提供信息,以服务于不同社区。
本描述性定性研究包括 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 4 月期间,在认证的护士助产实践或母婴家庭伙伴关系护理模式中通过远程医疗接受或提供围产保健的 14 名患者和 17 名提供者的目的性样本。最大差异抽样提供了基于种族、民族和农村性的多样化人群。研究人员进行了两轮半结构化访谈,重点是了解社会和地理背景。
通过归纳分析确定了 6 个主题:(1)远程医疗的意外优势,(2)患者赋权,(3)提供者对不良后果的担忧,(4)对公平护理的关注,(5)增强远程医疗体验的策略,以及(6)解决围产远程医疗获取的策略。患者赞赏访问的便利性增加和成本降低,从而减少了错过预约的情况。医疗保健提供者看到了远程医疗的巨大机会,但对语言障碍或资源有限的患者的可及性表示担忧。
本研究深入了解了继续利用远程医疗的重点,即提供公平获得围产保健的机会。提供者不应回到 COVID-19 大流行前形成的、基于长期惯例和感知限制的做法,而应鼓励他们利用远程医疗的快速创新,建立更有效、公平和以患者为中心的围产保健方法。