Dugani Sagar B, Kiliaki Shangwe A, Nielsen Megan L, Fischer Karen M, Lunde Megan, Kesselring Gina M, Lawson Donna K, Coons Trevor J, Schenzel Holly A, Parikh Riddhi S, Pagali Sandeep R, Liwonjo Anne, Croghan Ivana T, Schroeder Darrell R, Burton M Caroline
Division of Hospital, Internal Medicine, Mayo, Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Division of Hospital, Internal Medicine, Mayo, Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Sep;1(3):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
To determine whether a postdischarge video visit with patients, conducted by hospital medicine advanced practice providers, improves adherence to hospital discharge recommendations.
We conducted a single-institution 2-site randomized clinical trial with 1:1 assignment to intervention vs control, with enrollment from August 10, 2020, to June 23, 2022. Hospital medicine patients discharged home or to an assisted living facility were randomized to a video visit 2-5 days postdischarge in addition to usual care (intervention) vs usual care (control). During the video visit, advanced practice providers reviewed discharge recommendations. Both intervention and control groups received telephone follow-up 3-6 days postdischarge to ascertain the primary outcome of adherence to all discharge recommendations for new and chronic medication management, self-management and action plan, and home support.
Among 1190 participants (594 intervention; 596 control), the primary outcome was ascertained in 768 participants (314 intervention; 454 control). In intervention vs control, there was no difference in the proportion of participants with the primary outcome (76.7% vs 72.5%; =.19) or in the individual domains of the primary outcome: new and chronic medication management (94.1% vs 92.8%; =.50), self-management and action plan (76.5% vs 71.5%; =.18), and home support (94.1% vs 94.3%; =.94). Women receiving intervention vs control had higher adherence to recommendations (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.08-2.91).
In hospital medicine patients, a postdischarge video visit did not improve adherence to discharge recommendations. Potential gender differences in adherence require further investigation.Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04547803.
确定由医院内科高级执业人员对患者进行出院后视频访视是否能提高对医院出院建议的依从性。
我们进行了一项单机构双地点随机临床试验,按1:1分配至干预组与对照组,于2020年8月10日至2022年6月23日进行入组。出院回家或前往辅助生活设施的医院内科患者被随机分为两组,干预组除接受常规护理外,在出院后2 - 5天进行视频访视,对照组仅接受常规护理。在视频访视期间,高级执业人员会复查出院建议。干预组和对照组在出院后3 - 6天均接受电话随访,以确定在新的和慢性药物管理、自我管理和行动计划以及家庭支持方面对所有出院建议的依从性这一主要结局。
在1190名参与者中(594名干预组;596名对照组),768名参与者(314名干预组;454名对照组)确定了主要结局。在干预组与对照组之间,有主要结局的参与者比例(76.7%对72.5%;P = 0.19)或主要结局的各个领域均无差异:新的和慢性药物管理(94.1%对92.8%;P = 0.50)、自我管理和行动计划(76.5%对71.5%;P = 0.18)以及家庭支持(94.1%对94.3%;P = 0.94)。接受干预的女性与接受对照的女性相比,对建议的依从性更高(优势比,1.77;95%置信区间,1.08 - 2.91)。
对于医院内科患者,出院后视频访视并未提高对出院建议的依从性。依从性方面潜在的性别差异需要进一步研究。Clinicaltrials.gov编号,NCT04547803。