Department of Family Medicine and Community Health Duke University Durham NC.
Duke University School of Nursing Duke University Durham NC.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e023935. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023935. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
Background The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid implementation of telemedicine into clinical practice. This study examined whether early outpatient follow-up via telemedicine is as effective as in-person visits for reducing 30-day readmissions in patients with heart failure. Methods and Results Using electronic health records from a large health system, we included patients with heart failure living in North Carolina (N=6918) who were hospitalized between March 16, 2020 and March 14, 2021. All-cause readmission within 30 days after discharge was examined using weighted logistic regression models. Overall, 7.6% (N=526) of patients received early telemedicine follow-up, 38.8% (N=2681) received early in-person follow-up, and 53.6% (N=3711) did not receive follow-up within 14 days of discharge. Compared with patients without early follow-up, those who received early follow-up were younger, were more likely to be Medicare beneficiaries, had more comorbidities, and were less likely to live in an disadvantaged neighborhood. Relative to in-person visits, those with telemedicine follow-up were of similar age, sex, and race but with generally fewer comorbidities. Overall, the 30-day readmission rate (19.0%) varied among patients who received telemedicine visits (15.0%), in-person visits (14.0%), or no follow-up (23.1%). After covariate adjustment, patients who received either telemedicine (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.72) or in-person (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.60) visits were similarly less likely to be readmitted within 30 days compared with patients with no follow-up. Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telemedicine visits for early follow-up increased rapidly. Patients with heart failure who received outpatient follow-up either via telemedicine or in-person had better outcomes than those who received no follow-up.
COVID-19 大流行促使远程医疗迅速应用于临床实践。本研究旨在探讨心力衰竭患者早期通过远程医疗进行门诊随访是否与面对面就诊同样能降低 30 天再入院率。
我们利用来自一个大型医疗系统的电子健康记录,纳入了 2020 年 3 月 16 日至 2021 年 3 月 14 日期间在北卡罗来纳州住院的心力衰竭患者(N=6918)。使用加权逻辑回归模型检查出院后 30 天内的全因再入院情况。总体而言,7.6%(N=526)的患者接受了早期远程医疗随访,38.8%(N=2681)接受了早期面对面随访,53.6%(N=3711)未在出院后 14 天内进行随访。与未进行早期随访的患者相比,接受早期随访的患者年龄较小,更有可能是医疗保险受益人,合并症更多,居住在不利社区的可能性较小。与面对面就诊相比,接受远程医疗随访的患者年龄、性别和种族相似,但合并症通常较少。总体而言,接受远程医疗就诊(15.0%)、面对面就诊(14.0%)或未进行随访(23.1%)的患者 30 天再入院率存在差异。在校正协变量后,与未进行随访的患者相比,接受远程医疗(比值比[OR],0.55;95%CI,0.44-0.72)或面对面(OR,0.52;95%CI,0.45-0.60)就诊的患者 30 天内再入院的可能性同样较低。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗就诊用于早期随访的使用迅速增加。接受远程医疗或面对面门诊随访的心力衰竭患者比未接受随访的患者结局更好。