Institute for Biology and Environmental Sciences, Functional Ecology, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Box 2503, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancon, Panama City 0843-03092, Panama.
Ann Bot. 2023 Nov 23;132(3):513-522. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad128.
Substrate preferences are often treated as species traits and are used to distinguish different habits, i.e. an epiphytic, lithophytic or terrestrial habit. Such a categorization, however, ignores substantial intraspecific variation. An approach that takes biological variability within a species into account is needed.
We focused on four large genera of ferns and lycophytes and found relevant information in >500 sources, such as online databases, checklists, floras and species descriptions. Translating textual information into a quantitative index, we quantified the propensity to grow on either substrate as a continuous trait for 1475 species.
Only a minority of species exhibited strict substrate fidelity, but a majority of them showed clear habitat preferences. The relative frequencies of intermediates between strict lithophytes, epiphytes and terrestrials does not support the frequent notion of ecological similarity of the lithophytic and epiphytic habitat.
The compiled data are useful immediately for ecological and evolutionary studies with the focal taxa. More importantly, we propose the replacement of the concept of distinct habits with one of gradual differences. This should have a profound impact on any such study with plants in general.
底物偏好通常被视为物种特征,并用于区分不同的习性,例如附生、石生或陆生习性。然而,这种分类忽略了种内的大量变异。需要一种考虑物种内生物变异性的方法。
我们专注于四个大型蕨类植物和石松类植物属,并在 500 多个来源中找到了相关信息,如在线数据库、清单、植物区系和物种描述。我们将文本信息转化为定量指标,为 1475 个物种量化了在任一底物上生长的倾向作为连续特征。
只有少数物种表现出严格的底物保真度,但大多数物种表现出明显的栖息地偏好。严格的石生植物、附生植物和陆生植物之间的中间体的相对频率不支持石生和附生栖息地生态相似性的常见观点。
编译的数据立即可用于焦点分类群的生态和进化研究。更重要的是,我们建议用逐渐差异的概念代替明显习性的概念。这应该对一般植物的任何此类研究都产生深远的影响。