Suppr超能文献

提高重病退伍军人围手术期姑息治疗整合的策略。

Strategies to Improve Perioperative Palliative Care Integration for Seriously Ill Veterans.

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs (K.F.G., M.S., M.M., A.W., K.A.L.), Menlo Park, California; Primary Care and Population Health (K.F.G., K.A.L.), Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Department of Veterans Affairs (K.F.G., M.S., M.M., A.W., K.A.L.), Menlo Park, California; Department of Surgery (M.S., A.M.M.), S-SPIRE Center, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Dec;66(6):621-629.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.08.021. Epub 2023 Aug 27.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Seriously ill patients are at higher risk for adverse surgical outcomes. Palliative care (PC) interventions for seriously ill surgical patients are associated with improved quality of patient care and patient-centered outcomes, yet, they are underutilized perioperatively.

OBJECTIVES

To identify strategies for improving perioperative PC integration for seriously ill Veterans from the perspectives of PC providers and surgeons.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured, in-depth individual and group interviews with Veteran Health Administration PC team members and surgeons between July 2020 and April 2021. Participants were purposively sampled from high- and low-collaboration sites based on the proportion of received perioperative palliative consults. We performed a team-based thematic analysis with dual coding (inter-rater reliability above 0.8).

RESULTS

Interviews with 20 interdisciplinary PC providers and 13 surgeons at geographically distributed Veteran Affairs sites converged on four strategies for improving palliative care integration and goals of care conversations in the perioperative period: 1) develop and maintain collaborative, trusting relationships between palliative care providers and surgeons; 2) establish risk assessment processes to identify patients who may benefit from a PC consult; 3) involve both PC providers and surgeons at the appropriate time in the perioperative workflow; 4) provide sufficient resources to allow for an interdisciplinary sharing of care.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that individual, programmatic, and organizational efforts could facilitate interservice collaboration between PC clinicians and surgeons.

摘要

背景

重症患者发生不良手术结局的风险更高。姑息治疗(PC)干预措施与提高患者护理质量和以患者为中心的结局相关,但在围手术期的应用不足。

目的

从姑息治疗提供者和外科医生的角度确定改善重症退伍军人围手术期 PC 整合的策略。

方法

我们在 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 4 月期间对退伍军人健康管理局 PC 团队成员和外科医生进行了半结构化的深入个人和小组访谈。参与者是根据接受围手术期姑息咨询的比例,从高协作和低协作地点有目的地抽样。我们进行了基于团队的主题分析和双重编码(评分者间信度高于 0.8)。

结果

对分布在各地的退伍军人事务处地点的 20 名跨学科姑息治疗提供者和 13 名外科医生进行的访谈,提出了四项改善姑息治疗整合和围手术期目标护理对话的策略:1)在姑息治疗提供者和外科医生之间建立合作和信任关系;2)建立风险评估流程,以确定可能受益于 PC 咨询的患者;3)在围手术期工作流程的适当时间让姑息治疗提供者和外科医生参与;4)提供足够的资源,允许跨学科共享护理。

结论

该研究表明,个人、计划和组织方面的努力可以促进姑息治疗临床医生和外科医生之间的跨部门合作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验