• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医生申请研究培训的研究兴趣。

Research interests of family physicians applying for research training.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, 12631 East 17th Ave Box F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, KS, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04562-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04562-0
PMID:37644437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10466687/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing need for research to support the practice of high quality family medicine. The Family Medicine Discovers Rapid Cycle Scientific Discovery and Innovation (FMD RapSDI) program is designed to build capacity for family medicine scientific discovery and innovation in the United States. Our objective was to describe the applicants and research questions submitted to the RapSDI program in 2019 and 2020.

METHODS

Descriptive analysis for applicant characteristics and rapid qualitative analysis using principles of grounded theory and content analysis to examine the research questions and associated themes. We examined differences by year of application submission and the applicant's career stage.

RESULTS

Sixty-five family physicians submitted 70 applications to the RapSDI program; 45 in 2019 and 25 in 2020. 41% of applicants were in practice for five years or less (n = 27), 18% (n = 12) were in in practice 6-10 years, and 40% (n = 26) were ≥ 11 years in practice. With significant diversity in questions, the most common themes were studies of new innovations (n = 20, 28%), interventions to reduce cost (n = 20, 28%), improving screening or diagnosis (n = 19, 27%), ways to address mental or behavioral health (n = 18, 26%), and improving care for vulnerable populations (n = 18, 26%).

CONCLUSION

Applicants proposed a range of research questions and described why family medicine is optimally suited to address the questions. Applicants had a desire to develop knowledge to help other family physicians, their patients, and their communities. Findings from this study can help inform other family medicine research capacity building initiatives.

摘要

背景

支持高质量家庭医学实践的研究仍在继续。家庭医学发现快速循环科学发现和创新(FMD RapSDI)计划旨在为美国家庭医学的科学发现和创新建立能力。我们的目标是描述 2019 年和 2020 年提交给 RapSDI 计划的申请人和研究问题。

方法

对申请人特征进行描述性分析,并使用扎根理论和内容分析的原则对快速定性分析,以检查研究问题和相关主题。我们检查了申请提交年份和申请人职业阶段的差异。

结果

65 名家庭医生提交了 70 份 RapSDI 计划申请;2019 年 45 份,2020 年 25 份。41%的申请人(n=27)的执业年限为 5 年或更短,18%(n=12)为 6-10 年,40%(n=26)为 11 年或更长时间。虽然问题存在显著差异,但最常见的主题是对新创新的研究(n=20,28%)、降低成本的干预措施(n=20,28%)、改善筛查或诊断(n=19,27%)、解决精神或行为健康问题的方法(n=18,26%)以及改善弱势群体的护理(n=18,26%)。

结论

申请人提出了一系列研究问题,并说明了家庭医学为什么最适合解决这些问题。申请人希望发展知识,以帮助其他家庭医生、他们的患者和他们的社区。这项研究的结果可以为其他家庭医学研究能力建设计划提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/131e/10466687/e5bca07400e9/12909_2023_4562_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/131e/10466687/e5bca07400e9/12909_2023_4562_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/131e/10466687/e5bca07400e9/12909_2023_4562_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Research interests of family physicians applying for research training.家庭医生申请研究培训的研究兴趣。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04562-0.
2
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
GP recruitment and retention: a qualitative analysis of doctors' comments about training for and working in general practice.全科医生的招聘与留用:对医生关于全科医学培训及工作的评论的定性分析
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(83):iii-vi, 1-33.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Recruitment behavior and program directors: how ethical are their perspectives about the match process?招生行为与项目主任:他们对匹配过程的看法有多符合道德规范?
Fam Med. 2000 Apr;32(4):258-60.
7
Are early career family physicians prepared for practice in Canada? A qualitative study.加拿大的新入职家庭医生是否做好了行医准备?一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 24;23(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04250-z.
8
Impacts of the Certificates of Added Competence credentialling program: a qualitative case study of enhanced-skill family medicine practice across Canada.证书附加能力认证计划的影响:一项针对加拿大增强技能家庭医学实践的定性案例研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;9(4):E966-E972. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200278. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.
9
Recruitment, retention, and follow-up of graduates of a program to increase the number of family physicians in rural and underserved areas.一项旨在增加农村及医疗服务不足地区家庭医生数量的项目中毕业生的招募、留用及随访。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):934-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281307.
10
What does it mean to build research capacity?建设研究能力意味着什么?
Fam Med. 2002 Oct;34(9):678-84.

本文引用的文献

1
Burnout, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Among Family Physicians in Kansas Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic.堪萨斯州应对新冠疫情的家庭医生的职业倦怠、抑郁、焦虑和压力状况
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 May-Jun;34(3):522-530. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200523.
2
Family medicine research capacity in the USA.美国的家庭医学研究能力。
Fam Pract. 2021 Mar 29;38(2):187-189. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa119.
3
Burnout Among Family Physicians by Gender and Age.家庭医生的性别和年龄与倦怠之间的关系。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 May-Jun;33(3):355-356. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190319.
4
The Current State of Research Capacity in US Family Medicine Departments.美国家庭医学科研究能力的现状
Fam Med. 2019 Feb;51(2):112-119. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.180310.
5
Factors Associated With Successful Research Departments A Qualitative Analysis of Family Medicine Research Bright Spots.与成功的研究部门相关的因素:家庭医学研究亮点的定性分析
Fam Med. 2019 Feb 8;51(2):87-102. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.652014. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis.快速定性分析方法能否为临床领导者提供及时、有效的发现?一项比较快速分析和主题分析的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 8;8(10):e019993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019993.
7
Creating a culture of inquiry in family medicine.在家庭医学中营造探究文化。
Fam Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(7):515-21.
8
Culture, resources, or a bit of both: increasing scholarship in family medicine.文化、资源,或二者兼具:增加家庭医学领域的学术成果
Fam Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(7):501-2.
9
Preventing the voltage drop: keeping practice-based research network (PBRN) practices engaged in studies.防止电压下降:保持基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)实践参与研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):123-35. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130026.
10
Bridging the gap between basic science and clinical practice: the role of organizations in addressing clinician barriers.弥合基础科学与临床实践之间的差距:组织在解决临床医生障碍方面的作用。
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 4;6:35. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-35.