• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些方法最适合成功的老龄化预测?装袋法、提升法还是简单的机器学习算法?

Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms?

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.

Student Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences Branch, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Aug 29;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01140-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12938-023-01140-9
PMID:37644599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10463617/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The worldwide society is currently facing an epidemiological shift due to the significant improvement in life expectancy and increase in the elderly population. This shift requires the public and scientific community to highlight successful aging (SA), as an indicator representing the quality of elderly people's health. SA is a subjective, complex, and multidimensional concept; thus, its meaning or measuring is a difficult task. This study seeks to identify the most affecting factors on SA and fed them as input variables for constructing predictive models using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

METHODS

Data from 1465 adults aged ≥ 60 years who were referred to health centers in Abadan city (Iran) between 2021 and 2022 were collected by interview. First, binary logistic regression (BLR) was used to identify the main factors influencing SA. Second, eight ML algorithms, including adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), bootstrap aggregating (Bagging), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XG-Boost), random forest (RF), J-48, multilayered perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM), were trained to predict SA. Finally, their performance was evaluated using metrics derived from the confusion matrix to determine the best model.

RESULTS

The experimental results showed that 44 factors had a meaningful relationship with SA as the output class. In total, the RF algorithm with sensitivity = 0.95 ± 0.01, specificity = 0.94 ± 0.01, accuracy = 0.94 ± 0.005, and F-score = 0.94 ± 0.003 yielded the best performance for predicting SA.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to other selected ML methods, the effectiveness of the RF as a bagging algorithm in predicting SA was significantly better. Our developed prediction models can provide, gerontologists, geriatric nursing, healthcare administrators, and policymakers with a reliable and responsive tool to improve elderly outcomes.

摘要

背景

由于预期寿命的显著提高和老年人口的增加,全球社会目前正面临着一种流行病学转变。这种转变要求公众和科学界强调成功老龄化(SA),作为代表老年人健康质量的指标。SA 是一个主观的、复杂的和多维的概念;因此,它的含义或衡量是一项艰巨的任务。本研究旨在确定影响 SA 的最主要因素,并将其作为输入变量,利用机器学习(ML)算法构建预测模型。

方法

通过访谈收集了 2021 年至 2022 年间伊朗阿巴丹市卫生中心就诊的 1465 名年龄≥60 岁的成年人的数据。首先,采用二元逻辑回归(BLR)来识别影响 SA 的主要因素。其次,采用 8 种 ML 算法,包括自适应提升(AdaBoost)、自举聚合(Bagging)、极端梯度提升(XG-Boost)、随机森林(RF)、J-48、多层感知机(MLP)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)和支持向量机(SVM),对 SA 进行预测。最后,使用混淆矩阵得出的指标来评估它们的性能,以确定最佳模型。

结果

实验结果表明,44 个因素与作为输出类的 SA 有意义的关系。总的来说,RF 算法的灵敏度为 0.95±0.01、特异性为 0.94±0.01、准确性为 0.94±0.005 和 F 分数为 0.94±0.003,在预测 SA 方面表现最佳。

结论

与其他选定的 ML 方法相比,RF 作为一种装袋算法在预测 SA 方面的有效性明显更好。我们开发的预测模型可以为老年学家、老年护理、医疗保健管理人员和政策制定者提供一种可靠和响应迅速的工具,以改善老年人的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/3bb3057d2a44/12938_2023_1140_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/65eeebcf2946/12938_2023_1140_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/2dea11fc6161/12938_2023_1140_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/1421f945ad4b/12938_2023_1140_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/4c9ea48a276e/12938_2023_1140_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/21e9defce8f7/12938_2023_1140_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/3bb3057d2a44/12938_2023_1140_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/65eeebcf2946/12938_2023_1140_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/2dea11fc6161/12938_2023_1140_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/1421f945ad4b/12938_2023_1140_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/4c9ea48a276e/12938_2023_1140_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/21e9defce8f7/12938_2023_1140_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c675/10463617/3bb3057d2a44/12938_2023_1140_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms?哪些方法最适合成功的老龄化预测?装袋法、提升法还是简单的机器学习算法?
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Aug 29;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01140-9.
2
Using an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system for prediction of successful aging: a comparison with common machine learning algorithms.利用基于自适应网络的模糊推理系统预测成功老龄化:与常见机器学习算法的比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02335-9.
3
Prediction of successful aging using ensemble machine learning algorithms.利用集成机器学习算法预测成功老龄化。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 3;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02001-6.
4
Developing a prediction model for successful aging among the elderly using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法为老年人成功老龄化开发预测模型。
Digit Health. 2023 May 29;9:20552076231178425. doi: 10.1177/20552076231178425. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk.基于机器学习的乳腺癌复发风险预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02377-z.
6
Comparing machine learning algorithms to predict COVID‑19 mortality using a dataset including chest computed tomography severity score data.比较机器学习算法,使用包含胸部计算机断层扫描严重程度评分数据的数据集来预测 COVID-19 死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 13;13(1):11343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38133-6.
7
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
8
Prediction of childbearing tendency in women on the verge of marriage using machine learning techniques.使用机器学习技术预测即将步入婚姻的女性的生育倾向。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 6;14(1):20811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71854-w.
9
Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.不同机器学习算法在乳腺癌诊断中的分类成功率比较。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Oct 1;23(10):3287-3297. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.10.3287.
10
Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in critical traumatic patients: anatomic and physiologic variables from the RETRAUCI study.机器学习技术在危重症创伤患者死亡率预测中的应用:来自 RETRAUCI 研究的解剖学和生理学变量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01151-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the effect of pre-anesthesia clonidine and tranexamic acid on intraoperative bleeding volume in rhinoplasty: a machine learning approach.比较麻醉前可乐定与氨甲环酸对鼻整形术中出血量的影响:一种机器学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 17;15(1):30062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07450-3.
2
A novel explainable machine learning-based healthy ageing scale.一种新颖的基于可解释机器学习的健康老龄化量表。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02714-w.
3
A comparative study of explainable ensemble learning and logistic regression for predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a prediction model for successful aging among the elderly using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法为老年人成功老龄化开发预测模型。
Digit Health. 2023 May 29;9:20552076231178425. doi: 10.1177/20552076231178425. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
The United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing requires concerted global action.联合国健康老龄化十年需要全球共同行动。
Nat Aging. 2021 Jan;1(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s43587-020-00011-5.
3
Prediction of successful aging using ensemble machine learning algorithms.利用集成机器学习算法预测成功老龄化。
一种用于预测急诊科住院死亡率的可解释集成学习与逻辑回归的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 10;14(1):3406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54038-4.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 3;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02001-6.
4
Molecular subtype classification of low-grade gliomas using magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics and machine learning.基于磁共振成像的放射组学和机器学习对低级别胶质瘤的分子亚型分类。
NMR Biomed. 2022 Nov;35(11):e4792. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4792. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning for COVID-19 drug discovery and vaccine design.人工智能和机器学习在 COVID-19 药物发现和疫苗设计中的应用。
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Nov 5;22(6). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab320.
6
Ensemble machine learning classification of daily living abilities among older people with HIV.艾滋病毒感染老年人日常生活能力的集成机器学习分类
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 7;35:100845. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100845. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Prediction of functional outcomes of schizophrenia with genetic biomarkers using a bagging ensemble machine learning method with feature selection.采用基于特征选择的装袋集成机器学习方法预测精神分裂症的功能结局的遗传生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89540-6.
8
Fingermark ridge drift: Influencing factors of a not-so-rare aging phenomenon.指纹嵴纹迁移:一种并非罕见的老化现象的影响因素。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Jul;66(4):1472-1481. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14710. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
9
New methods based on back propagation (BP) and radial basis function (RBF) artificial neural networks (ANNs) for predicting the occurrence of haloketones in tap water.基于反向传播 (BP) 和径向基函数 (RBF) 人工神经网络 (ANNs) 的预测自来水中卤代酮生成的新方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 10;772:145534. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145534. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
Can healthy life style predict successful aging among Iranian older adults?健康的生活方式能否预测伊朗老年人的成功老龄化?
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Oct 19;34:139. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.139. eCollection 2020.