Boccio Cashen M, Protas Michelle E, Jackson Dylan B, Leal Wanda E
The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA.
University of Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Dec;38(23-24):12113-12134. doi: 10.1177/08862605231192584. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
Previous research documents relationships between unstructured socializing activities and in-person victimization in adolescents. In parallel, there is a body of research which has linked virtual socialization activities (i.e., social networking, texting, video chatting, phone usage) with both online and in-person victimization. The majority of research in this area, however, has assumed the relationship between time spent engaging in virtual socializing and victimization is linear. Yet, there are several reasons to anticipate that while virtual socializing may initially increase the risks for in-person victimization, after adolescents begin spending a significant portion of their free time socializing virtually this may function to displace time they would have otherwise spent engaging in unstructured socializing in-person. As a result, very high levels of engagement in virtual socializing may actually lower the risks for in-person victimization. This study addresses this gap in the literature by utilizing negative binomial regression and logistic regression to test for nonlinearity in the relationship between virtual socializing and three forms of in-person victimization (i.e., violent, property, and in-person bullying) using data from the 8th and 10th grade 2018 cohort of Monitoring the Future. In addition, this study tests for nonlinearity in the relationship between virtual socializing and one form of online victimization (i.e., cyberbullying). Our findings reveal that virtual socializing is associated with all four forms of victimization. In addition, tests for nonlinearity revealed that virtual socializing exhibits a nonlinear relationship with in-person property victimization and cyberbullying victimization. Additional analyses revealed differential relationships between individual virtual socializing activities and the risks for property victimization. On the other hand, three out of the four forms of virtual socializing activities were found to exhibit nonlinear relationships with the likelihood of cyberbullying victimization. Overall, these findings imply that virtual socializing activities appear to exhibit nonlinear relationships with several forms of victimization.
以往的研究记录了青少年非结构化社交活动与亲身经历的受害情况之间的关系。与此同时,有一系列研究将虚拟社交活动(即社交网络、短信、视频聊天、电话使用)与网络及亲身经历的受害情况联系起来。然而,该领域的大多数研究都假定参与虚拟社交的时间与受害情况之间的关系是线性的。然而,有几个理由可以预期,虽然虚拟社交最初可能会增加亲身受害的风险,但在青少年开始将大量空闲时间用于虚拟社交之后,这可能会取代他们原本会用于进行非结构化面对面社交的时间。因此,极高水平的虚拟社交参与实际上可能会降低亲身受害的风险。本研究通过使用负二项回归和逻辑回归,利用来自2018年“未来监测”八年级和十年级队列的数据,来检验虚拟社交与三种亲身受害形式(即暴力、财产和面对面欺凌)之间关系的非线性,从而填补了文献中的这一空白。此外,本研究还检验了虚拟社交与一种网络受害形式(即网络欺凌)之间关系的非线性。我们的研究结果表明,虚拟社交与所有四种受害形式都有关联。此外,非线性检验表明,虚拟社交与亲身财产受害和网络欺凌受害呈现非线性关系。进一步的分析揭示了个体虚拟社交活动与财产受害风险之间的差异关系。另一方面,发现四种虚拟社交活动中的三种与网络欺凌受害的可能性呈现非线性关系。总体而言,这些研究结果表明,虚拟社交活动似乎与多种受害形式呈现非线性关系。