Wang Liangshan, Li Chenglong, Hao Xin, Rycus Peter, Tonna Joseph E, Alexander Peta, Fan Eddy, Wang Hong, Yang Feng, Hou Xiaotong
Center for Cardiac Intensive Care, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Aug 30;13(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01174-1.
Percutaneous cannulation is now accepted as the first-line strategy for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in adults. However, previous studies comparing percutaneous cannulation to surgical cannulation have been limited by small sample size and single-center settings. This study aimed to compare in-hospital outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA) patients who received femoro-femoral ECPR with percutaneous vs surgical cannulation.
Adults with refractory CA treated with percutaneous (percutaneous group) or surgical (surgical group) femoro-femoral ECPR between January 2008 and December 2019 were extracted from the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. The primary outcome was severe neurological complication. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between percutaneous cannulation and in-hospital outcomes.
Among 3575 patients meeting study inclusion, 2749 (77%) underwent percutaneous cannulation. The proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous cannulation increased from 18% to 89% over the study period (p < 0.001 for trend). Severe neurological complication (13% vs 19%; p < 0.001) occurred less frequently in the percutaneous group compared to the surgical group. In adjusted analyses, percutaneous cannulation was independently associated with lower rate of severe neurological complication (odds ratio [OR] 0.62; 95% CI 0.46-0.83; p = 0.002), similar rates of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.73-1.17; p = 0.522), limb ischemia (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.58-1.20; p = 0.341) and cannulation site bleeding (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.66-1.22; p = 0.471). The comparison of outcomes provided similar results across different levels of center percutaneous experience or center ECPR volume.
Among adults receiving ECPR, percutaneous cannulation was associated with probable lower rate of severe neurological complication, and similar rates of in-hospital mortality, limb ischemia and cannulation site bleeding.
经皮插管现已被公认为成人体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的一线策略。然而,以往比较经皮插管与外科插管的研究受到样本量小和单中心设置的限制。本研究旨在比较接受股-股ECPR且采用经皮插管与外科插管的心脏骤停(CA)患者的院内结局。
从国际体外生命支持组织登记处提取2008年1月至2019年12月期间接受经皮(经皮组)或外科(外科组)股-股ECPR治疗的难治性CA成人患者。主要结局是严重神经并发症。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以评估经皮插管与院内结局之间的关联。
在3575例符合研究纳入标准的患者中,2749例(77%)接受了经皮插管。在研究期间,接受经皮插管的患者比例从18%增加到89%(趋势p<0.001)。与外科组相比,经皮组严重神经并发症的发生率较低(13%对19%;p<0.001)。在调整分析中,经皮插管与严重神经并发症发生率较低独立相关(优势比[OR]0.62;95%CI 0.46-0.83;p=0.002);院内死亡率(OR 0.93;95%CI 0.73-1.17;p=0.522)、肢体缺血(OR 0.84;95%CI 0.58-1.20;p=0.341)和插管部位出血(OR 0.90;95%CI 0.66-1.22;p=0.471)的发生率相似。不同中心经皮经验水平或中心ECPR量的结局比较提供了相似的结果。
在接受ECPR的成人中,经皮插管与严重神经并发症发生率可能较低以及院内死亡率、肢体缺血和插管部位出血发生率相似相关。