Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia.
Pharmacy Department, Seri Manjung Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Seri Manjung, Perak, Malaysia.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Nov;21(6):857-875. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00825-5. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
This systematic review aimed to summarise the outcomes of economic evaluations that evaluated sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in combination with standard of care compared to standard of care alone for patients with chronic heart failure.
This systematic review searched MEDLINE, CINAHL+, Econlit, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry from inception to 31 December, 2022, for relevant economic evaluations, which were critically appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) and Bias in Economic Evaluation (ECOBIAS) criteria. The costs, quality-adjusted life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness thresholds were qualitatively analysed. Net monetary benefits at different decision thresholds were also computed. Subgroup analyses addressing the heterogeneity of economic outcomes were conducted. All costs were adjusted to 2023 international dollar (US$) values using the CCEMG-EPPI-Centre cost converter.
Thirty-nine economic evaluations that evaluated dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with heart failure were found: 32 for the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and seven for LVEF > 40%. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors were cost-effective in all but two economic evaluations for LVEF > 40%. Economic outcomes varied widely, but favoured SGLT2i use in LVEF ≤ 40% over LVEF > 40% and upper-middle income over high-income countries. At a threshold of US$30,000/quality-adjusted life-year, ~ 90% of high to upper-middle income countries would consider SGLT2i cost-effective for heart failure treatment. The generalisability of study findings to low- and low-middle income countries is limited because of insufficient evidence.
Using SGLT2i to treat heart failure is cost-effective, with more certainty in LVEF ≤ 40% compared to LVEF > 40%. Policymakers in jurisdictions where economic evaluations are not available could potentially use this study's findings to make informed decisions about treatment adoption.
This study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42023388701).
本系统评价旨在总结钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)联合标准治疗与单独标准治疗相比,用于慢性心力衰竭患者的经济评价结果。
本系统评价检索了 MEDLINE、CINAHL+、Econlit、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆、英国国家卫生服务经济评价数据库和成本效益分析登记处,从成立到 2022 年 12 月 31 日,以获取相关的经济评价,使用统一健康经济评价报告标准(CHEERS)和经济评价偏倚(ECOBIAS)标准进行严格评价。定性分析了成本、质量调整生命年、增量成本效益比和成本效益阈值。还计算了不同决策阈值下的净货币收益。进行了针对经济结果异质性的亚组分析。所有成本均使用 CCEMG-EPPI-Centre 成本转换器调整为 2023 年国际美元(美元)值。
发现了 39 项评估达格列净和恩格列净在心力衰竭患者中的经济学评价:32 项用于左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤40%,7 项用于 LVEF>40%。SGLT2i 在除了两项 LVEF>40%的经济评价中外,在其他所有评价中都是具有成本效益的。经济结果差异很大,但在 LVEF≤40%时,SGLT2i 的使用优于 LVEF>40%,在中高收入国家优于高收入国家。在 30000 美元/质量调整生命年的阈值下,约 90%的高收入至中高收入国家将认为 SGLT2i 治疗心力衰竭具有成本效益。由于证据不足,研究结果在中低收入国家的推广性有限。
使用 SGLT2i 治疗心力衰竭具有成本效益,在 LVEF≤40%时比 LVEF>40%更有把握。在没有经济评价的司法管辖区,决策者可以利用本研究的结果,就治疗采用做出知情决策。
本研究方案在国际前瞻性系统评价登记处(PROSPERO;CRD42023388701)进行了注册。