• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国射血分数降低的心力衰竭管理中四联疗法的成本效益。

Cost-Effectiveness of Quadruple Therapy in Management of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management (B.W.Y., A.P.), Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (B.W.Y.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Jun;16(6):e009793. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009793. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009793
PMID:37278232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2022 clinical guidelines for management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction call for quadruple therapy. Quadruple therapy consists of an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and beta blocker. The ARNi and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor are newer additions to standard of care with the ARNi replacing ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

METHODS

We investigate the cost-effectiveness of sequentially adding the SGLT2i and ARNi to form quadruple therapy as compared with the previous standard of care with ACE inhibitor/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist/beta blocker. Using a 2-stage Markov model, we projected the expected lifetime discounted costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of a simulated cohort of US patients who underwent each treatment option and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We assessed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using criteria for health care value (<$50 000/quality-adjusted life year [QALY] indicating high-value, $50 000-150 000/QALY indicating intermediate value, and >$150 000/QALY indicating low-value) and a standard $100 000/QALY cost-effectiveness threshold.

RESULTS

Compared with the previous standard of care, the SGLT2i addition had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $73 000/QALY and weakly dominated the ARNi addition. The addition of both the ARNi and SGLT2i for quadruple therapy offered 0.68 additional discounted QALYs over the SGLT2i addition alone at a lifetime discounted cost of $66 700, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $98 500/QALY. In sensitivity analysis varying drug prices, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for quadruple therapy ranged from $73 500/QALY using prices available to the US Department of Veterans Affairs to $110 000/QALY using drug list prices.

CONCLUSIONS

While quadruple therapy offers intermediate value, it is borderline cost effective compared with adding the SGLT2i alone to previous standard of care. Thus, its cost-effectiveness is sensitive to a payer's ability to negotiate discounts off the increasing list prices for ARNI and SGLT2is. The demonstrated benefits of ARNi and SGLT2is should be weighed against their high prices in payer and policy considerations.

摘要

背景

2022 年心力衰竭伴射血分数降低的临床指南呼吁采用四联疗法。四联疗法包括血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNi)、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)、盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂和β受体阻滞剂。ARNi 和 SGLT2i 是标准治疗的新添加物,ARNi 取代了 ACE(血管紧张素转换酶)抑制剂和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂。

方法

我们研究了依次添加 SGLT2i 和 ARNi 以形成四联疗法与之前的 ACE 抑制剂/盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂/β受体阻滞剂标准治疗相比的成本效益。使用两阶段马尔可夫模型,我们预测了接受每种治疗方案的美国患者模拟队列的预期终生贴现成本和质量调整生命年(QALY),并计算了增量成本效益比。我们使用卫生保健价值标准(<$50000/QALY 表示高价值,$50000-150000/QALY 表示中等价值,>$150000/QALY 表示低价值)和标准的$100000/QALY 成本效益阈值来评估增量成本效益比。

结果

与之前的标准治疗相比,SGLT2i 的添加具有$73000/QALY 的增量成本效益比,并且略微优于 ARNi 的添加。ARNi 和 SGLT2i 的联合添加用于四联疗法,在终生贴现成本为$66700 时,比单独添加 SGLT2i 可额外获得 0.68 个贴现 QALY,增量成本效益比为$98500/QALY。在药物价格变化的敏感性分析中,四联疗法的增量成本效益比范围从使用美国退伍军人事务部可获得的价格为$73500/QALY 到使用药物清单价格为$110000/QALY。

结论

虽然四联疗法提供了中等价值,但与将 SGLT2i 添加到之前的标准治疗相比,它的成本效益具有边缘性。因此,其成本效益对支付方协商降低 ARNi 和 SGLT2i 不断上涨的目录价格的能力敏感。在支付方和政策考虑因素中,应权衡 ARNi 和 SGLT2i 的高价格与它们的获益。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Quadruple Therapy in Management of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in the United States.美国射血分数降低的心力衰竭管理中四联疗法的成本效益。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Jun;16(6):e009793. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009793. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
2
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors First Strategy Improve Decongestion in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction When Compared to Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor First Strategy.与血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂优先策略相比,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂优先策略可改善症状性心力衰竭且射血分数降低患者的充血情况。
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2023 Apr 27;28(4):81. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2804081.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数轻度降低和保留的心力衰竭的医学治疗的成本效益。
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Jul;12(7):1226-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.03.006. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive Quadruple Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.心力衰竭伴射血分数降低的综合四联疗法的成本效益分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 May;11(5):541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Medicare Coverage and Out-of-Pocket Costs of Quadruple Drug Therapy for Heart Failure.医疗保险覆盖范围和心力衰竭四联药物治疗的自付费用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jun 28;79(25):2516-2525. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.031.
6
Health and Economic Evaluation of Sacubitril-Valsartan for Heart Failure Management.沙库巴曲缬沙坦用于心力衰竭管理的健康和经济评估。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Nov 1;8(11):1041-1048. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3216.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Combination Therapy Compared With Enalapril for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠联合治疗与依那普利治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的成本效果比较。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 May;4(5):392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan Use Compared With Standard Care in Chronic Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction in South Korea.韩国射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭患者中沙库巴曲缬沙坦与标准治疗相比的成本-效用分析。
Clin Ther. 2019 Jun;41(6):1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.031. Epub 2019 May 15.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Switching Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction to Sacubitril/Valsartan: The Australian Perspective.将射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者转换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的成本效益:澳大利亚视角
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Sep;29(9):1310-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan in chronic heart-failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭患者的成本效益分析
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Nov 15;147:w14533. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14533. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
County-Level Variation in Triple Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者三联指南指导药物治疗的县级差异
JACC Adv. 2024 Jun 12;3(7):101014. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101014. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
The economics of heart failure care.心力衰竭治疗的经济学。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Feb;82:90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.010. Epub 2024 Jan 18.