Dental department, Phon Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 30;13(1):14233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41511-9.
This study investigated the influence of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on the shear bond strength (SBS) to artificial carious dentin and GIC restorations with various SDF application protocols. Artificial caries were prepared on human dentin discs using bacteria model. These samples were randomly allocated to five groups (n = 10/group) according to the following treatment: (1) control group (CD): no treatment (2) CSR: dentin conditioner, SDF, and rinsing (3) CS: dentin conditioner and SDF (4) SRC: SDF, rinsing and dentin conditioner, and (5) SC: SDF and dentin conditioner. The treated-dentin surface was bonded with GIC and subjected to SBS test. Mean SBS was analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Surface morphology and elemental contents after surface treatment were examined (n = 3/group) by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX). There was no significant difference in the mean SBS among CD (2.45 ± 0.99 MPa), CSR (1.76 ± 0.65 MPa), and SRC (2.64 ± 0.95 MPa). Meanwhile, the mean SBS of CS (0.35 ± 0.21 MPa) was significantly lower than the control and SRC group. SEM/EDX demonstrated deeper silver penetration in CSR and CS groups when compared to SRC and SC groups. SDF-modified GIC restorations resulted in significantly lower bond strength in CS and SC groups. The findings suggested treating the carious dentin surface with CSR and SRC protocol. SDF-treated carious dentin should be rinsed off prior to restore with GIC.
本研究调查了不同银胺氟化物(SDF)应用方案对人工龋损牙本质和玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)修复体剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。使用细菌模型在人牙本质片上制备人工龋。根据以下处理方法,将这些样本随机分为五组(每组 n=10):(1)对照组(CD):不处理(2)CSR:牙本质处理剂、SDF 和冲洗(3)CS:牙本质处理剂和 SDF(4)SRC:SDF、冲洗和牙本质处理剂,以及(5)SC:SDF 和牙本质处理剂。处理后的牙本质表面用 GIC 粘结,并进行 SBS 测试。采用单因素方差分析对平均 SBS 进行分析。用扫描电子显微镜结合能谱仪(SEM/EDX)对表面处理后的表面形貌和元素含量进行分析(每组 n=3)。CD(2.45±0.99 MPa)、CSR(1.76±0.65 MPa)和 SRC(2.64±0.95 MPa)组之间的平均 SBS 无显著差异。同时,CS 组(0.35±0.21 MPa)的平均 SBS 明显低于对照组和 SRC 组。SEM/EDX 显示 CSR 和 CS 组的银渗透深度明显深于 SRC 和 SC 组。SDF 改性 GIC 修复体在 CS 和 SC 组的粘结强度明显降低。研究结果表明,CSR 和 SRC 方案处理龋坏牙本质表面。在用 GIC 修复之前,应冲洗掉 SDF 处理过的龋坏牙本质。