• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用钢包炉渣稳定低承载能力粘性土的强度性能。

Strength performance of low-bearing-capacity clayey soils stabilized with ladle furnace slag.

机构信息

Department of Construction, Escuela Politécnica Superior, University of Burgos, c/ Villadiego s/n, 09001, Burgos, Spain.

Universidad de Burgos Escuela Politecnica Superior, c/ Villadiego s/n, Burgos, 09001, Spain.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):101317-101342. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29375-y. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-29375-y
PMID:37648914
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10541828/
Abstract

In this paper, the performance of ladle furnace slag (LFS), a by-product of secondary steel refining, is evaluated as a binder to stabilize clayey soils of low bearing capacity. The aim is to define whether additions of this by-product to clayey soil can stabilize the soil in accordance with the technical specifications of Spanish standards. To do so, three different soils stabilized with 5% LFS were compared with the same soils stabilized with 2% lime and with no stabilization, in order to investigate their different behaviors. The chemical and mineralogical characterizations of all the soil mixes were conducted using X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. The Atterberg limit test was used to study the plastic behavior of the soils, and the results of compaction, bearing capacity, unconfined compressive strength, and direct shear strength (cohesion and friction angle) tests defined their strength characteristics. The analysis was completed with the pH monitoring of the mixes along the curing time in order to relate the pH changes with the strength evolution. The addition of LFS to the soils has resulted in an increase in the liquid limit and plastic limit, causing therefore a slight decrease in the plasticity index. All the soils showed increases between 30% and 70% in their California Bearing Ratios immediately after mixing with 5% LFS, and after 90 days of curing, improvements of 30-188% in their unconfined compressive strength were noted in comparison with untreated soil, which were higher than the lime-stabilized soils. The cohesion of soils stabilized with LFS at 28 days of curing obtained improvements ranging from 40 to 300% depending on the type of soil. However, the friction angle showed a slight increase of 10% in two of the soils and zero in another. The high initial pH in LFS-stabilized soils was maintained during the curing time, which favored the development of pozzolanic reactions that improve the soil strength. These results confirmed that the substitution of lime with LFS is a feasible option for soil stabilization.

摘要

本文评估了钢包炉渣(LFS)作为一种粘结剂来稳定低承载能力粘性土的性能。LFS 是二次炼钢的副产品。其目的是确定添加这种副产品是否可以根据西班牙标准的技术规范稳定土壤。为此,将三种不同的 LFS 稳定的粘性土与用 2%石灰稳定的粘性土和未稳定的粘性土进行了比较,以研究它们的不同行为。所有土壤混合物的化学和矿物学特性均采用 X 射线荧光、X 射线衍射和扫描电子显微镜进行了研究。使用界限含水率试验研究了土壤的塑性行为,压实、承载力、无侧限抗压强度和直接剪切强度(凝聚力和内摩擦角)试验的结果定义了它们的强度特性。通过监测混合土在固化过程中的 pH 值,将 pH 值的变化与强度的演化联系起来。将 LFS 添加到土壤中会导致液限和塑限增加,从而导致塑性指数略有降低。所有土壤在与 5%LFS 混合后立即表现出加利福尼亚承载比提高 30%至 70%,在 90 天的养护后,与未处理的土壤相比,无侧限抗压强度提高了 30%至 188%,这比石灰稳定的土壤更高。在 28 天的养护期内,LFS 稳定土的凝聚力提高了 40%至 300%,具体取决于土壤类型。然而,在两种土壤中摩擦角略有增加 10%,在另一种土壤中则为零。LFS 稳定土的初始 pH 值在固化过程中保持较高水平,有利于火山灰反应的发展,从而提高了土壤强度。这些结果证实,用 LFS 替代石灰是稳定土壤的一种可行选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/d5fcdf4e5976/11356_2023_29375_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/a7e9e9933083/11356_2023_29375_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/c46086869468/11356_2023_29375_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/11b956015916/11356_2023_29375_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/09b47a450296/11356_2023_29375_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/c6e35cd9245c/11356_2023_29375_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/7c568ad24f5a/11356_2023_29375_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/1684eb019ea0/11356_2023_29375_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/41699dd727ee/11356_2023_29375_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/930f29ce42ab/11356_2023_29375_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/e69c71620a5d/11356_2023_29375_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/667998584f46/11356_2023_29375_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/5e773133c62c/11356_2023_29375_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/6bdf58dd05cf/11356_2023_29375_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/d5fcdf4e5976/11356_2023_29375_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/a7e9e9933083/11356_2023_29375_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/c46086869468/11356_2023_29375_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/11b956015916/11356_2023_29375_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/09b47a450296/11356_2023_29375_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/c6e35cd9245c/11356_2023_29375_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/7c568ad24f5a/11356_2023_29375_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/1684eb019ea0/11356_2023_29375_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/41699dd727ee/11356_2023_29375_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/930f29ce42ab/11356_2023_29375_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/e69c71620a5d/11356_2023_29375_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/667998584f46/11356_2023_29375_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/5e773133c62c/11356_2023_29375_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/6bdf58dd05cf/11356_2023_29375_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/421a/10541828/d5fcdf4e5976/11356_2023_29375_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Strength performance of low-bearing-capacity clayey soils stabilized with ladle furnace slag.利用钢包炉渣稳定低承载能力粘性土的强度性能。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):101317-101342. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29375-y. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
An experimental investigation on utilization of ladle refined furnace (LRF) slag in stabilizing clayey soil.钢包精炼炉(LRF)炉渣用于稳定黏性土的试验研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e26004. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26004. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
3
Geotechnical properties of clayey soil improved by sewage sludge ash.污泥灰改良粘性土的岩土特性。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Jan;72(1):34-47. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2020.1862939. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
4
Stabilization of a Clayey Soil with Ladle Metallurgy Furnace Slag Fines.用钢包精炼炉渣细粉稳定粘性土
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 24;13(19):4251. doi: 10.3390/ma13194251.
5
Experimental investigations on physico-mechanical properties of kaolinite clay soil stabilized at optimum silica fume content using clamshell ash and lime.关于使用蚌壳灰和石灰在最佳硅灰含量下稳定高岭土粘土的物理力学性质的试验研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 14;14(1):10995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61854-1.
6
Evaluation of the Effect of Binary Fly Ash-Lime Mixture on the Bearing Capacity of Natural Soils: A Comparison with Two Conventional Stabilizers Lime and Portland Cement.二元粉煤灰-石灰混合物对天然土壤承载力影响的评估:与两种传统稳定剂石灰和波特兰水泥的比较
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 26;16(11):3996. doi: 10.3390/ma16113996.
7
GMCs stabilized/solidified Pb/Zn contaminated soil under different curing temperature: Physical and microstructural properties.在不同养护温度下,固化/稳定化 Pb/Zn 污染土壤的 GMCs:物理和微观结构性能。
Chemosphere. 2020 Jan;239:124738. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124738. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Enhancing clayey soil performance with lime and waste rubber tyre powder: Mechanical, microstructural, and statistical analysis.用石灰和废橡胶轮胎粉提高黏性土性能:力学、微观结构及统计分析
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 1;256:119217. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119217. Epub 2024 May 22.
9
Influence of Freeze-Thaw Cycles and Binder Dosage on the Engineering Properties of Compound Solidified/Stabilized Lead-Contaminated Soils.冻融循环和结合剂剂量对复合固化/稳定化铅污染土壤工程性质的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 8;17(3):1077. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031077.
10
Improvement of Geotechnical Properties of Clayey Soil Using Biopolymer and Ferrochromium Slag Additives.使用生物聚合物和铬铁渣添加剂改善黏土的岩土工程性质
Polymers (Basel). 2024 May 7;16(10):1306. doi: 10.3390/polym16101306.