Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
College of Traffic Engineering, Yangzhou Polytechnic Institute, Yangzhou, 225127, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):101223-101233. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29521-6. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
In light of the adverse environmental impact of the R134a refrigerant, replacing it with a more environmentally friendly refrigerant has become imperative than ever. This study presents an experimental investigation into the utilization of R152a and R134a refrigerants in a vapor compression refrigeration system employing a variable displacement oil-free linear compressor. The potential for the replacement of R134a with R152a was examined based on energy, environmental, and economic performance analyses. The outcomes indicated that R152a exhibited a higher coefficient of performance (COP) in comparison to R134a under identical operating conditions. Specifically, when the pressure ratio was 2.0 and the piston stroke was 11 mm, R152a's COP was 13.0% higher than R134a. It was also discovered that reducing the operating stroke and increasing the pressure ratio could effectively lower CO emissions and total costs. Under the 2.0 pressure ratio and 9-mm piston stroke, R134a produced 1082.4 kg more CO emissions than R152a, representing a 209% increase. In addition, the R152a and R134a total cost was reduced by 8.3% with the 2.5 pressure ratio and 11-mm piston stroke. Notably, the results of the current study demonstrated that R152a outperformed R134a in energy consumption, environmental friendliness, and economy in oil-free linear compressor refrigeration systems. R152a used less electric power, generated fewer CO emissions, and naturally reduced predicted running costs in order to maintain the same COP.
鉴于 R134a 制冷剂对环境的不利影响,用更环保的制冷剂替代它变得比以往任何时候都更加紧迫。本研究对使用可变排量无油线性压缩机的蒸气压缩制冷系统中 R152a 和 R134a 制冷剂的应用进行了实验研究。基于能量、环境和经济性能分析,考察了用 R152a 替代 R134a 的可能性。结果表明,在相同的运行条件下,R152a 的性能系数(COP)高于 R134a。具体而言,当压力比为 2.0 且活塞行程为 11mm 时,R152a 的 COP 比 R134a 高 13.0%。还发现,减小运行行程和增大压力比可以有效地降低 CO 排放和总成本。在 2.0 的压力比和 9mm 的活塞行程下,R134a 比 R152a 多产生 1082.4kg 的 CO 排放,增加了 209%。此外,在 2.5 的压力比和 11mm 的活塞行程下,R152a 和 R134a 的总成本降低了 8.3%。值得注意的是,本研究的结果表明,在无油线性压缩机制冷系统中,R152a 在能耗、环保和经济性方面均优于 R134a。R152a 消耗的电力更少,产生的 CO 排放量更少,并且为了保持相同的 COP,自然会降低预测的运行成本。