• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科团队中纳入药师干预以减少药物不良事件:一项定性系统评价。

Intervention of pharmacist included in multidisciplinary team to reduce adverse drug event: a qualitative systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nimes, France.

Desbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Univ Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):927. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09512-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09512-6
PMID:37649018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10470127/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventable harm in healthcare is a growing public health challenge. In addition to the economic costs of safety failures, adverse drug events (ADE) may lead to complication or even death. Multidisciplinary care team involving a pharmacist appears to be an adequate response to prevention of adverse drug event. This qualitative systematic review aims to identify and describe multidisciplinary planned team-based care involving at least one pharmacist to limit or prevent adverse drug events in the adult patients.

METHODS

To determine the type of interprofessional collaboration to prevent adverse drug event in which a pharmacist was involved, we conducted a qualitative systematic review of the literature of randomized controlled trials. Two independent reviewers screened trials in three databases: Medline, Web of Science, ScienceDirect. Prospective studies of at least three different health professionals' interventions, one of whom was a pharmacist in the last five years were included. Two reviewers performed data extraction and quality appraisal independently. We used TIDieR checklist to appraise articles quality.

RESULTS

In total 803 citations were retrieved, 34 were analysed and 16 full-text articles were reviewed. Only 3 studies published an implementation evaluation. More than half of the interventions (62%) targeted elderly patients including 6 whom lived in nursing homes. Studies outcomes were heterogeneous, and we did not perform a statistical analysis of the impact of these interventions. Most teams are composed of a physician/pharmacist/nurse trio (94%; 100%; 88%). Half of the teams were composed of the primary care physician. Other professionals were included such as physical therapists (25%), social worker (19%), occupational therapists (12%), and community health educator (6%). Multidisciplinary medication review was the most common intervention and was generally structured in four steps: data collection and baseline assessment, appraisal report by health professionals, a multidisciplinary medication review meeting and a patient follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common multidisciplinary intervention to prevent ADE in the adult population is the multidisciplinary drug review meeting at least the physician/pharmacist/nurse trio. Interventions target mostly elderly people in nursing homes, although complex chronic patients could benefit from this type of assessment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration: CRD42022334685.

摘要

背景

医疗保健中的可预防伤害是一个日益严重的公共卫生挑战。除了安全故障的经济成本外,药物不良事件(ADE)可能导致并发症甚至死亡。涉及药剂师的多学科护理团队似乎是预防药物不良事件的适当对策。本定性系统评价旨在确定和描述至少涉及一名药剂师的多学科计划团队护理,以限制或预防成年患者的药物不良事件。

方法

为了确定涉及药剂师的预防药物不良事件的专业间协作类型,我们对过去五年中涉及至少三名不同卫生专业人员干预措施的随机对照试验进行了定性系统评价。两名独立审查员在三个数据库中筛选试验:Medline、Web of Science、ScienceDirect。纳入的前瞻性研究有至少 3 名不同卫生专业人员的干预措施,其中 1 名为药剂师。两名审查员独立进行数据提取和质量评估。我们使用 TIDieR 清单评估文章质量。

结果

共检索到 803 条引文,分析了 34 条,审查了 16 篇全文文章。只有 3 项研究发表了实施评估。超过一半的干预措施(62%)针对老年人,其中 6 人居住在养老院。研究结果具有异质性,我们没有对这些干预措施的影响进行统计分析。大多数团队由医生/药剂师/护士三人组组成(94%;100%;88%)。一半的团队由初级保健医生组成。还包括其他专业人员,如物理治疗师(25%)、社会工作者(19%)、职业治疗师(12%)和社区健康教育者(6%)。多学科药物审查是最常见的干预措施,通常分为四个步骤:数据收集和基线评估、卫生专业人员的评估报告、多学科药物审查会议和患者随访。

结论

预防成年人群药物不良事件的最常见多学科干预措施是至少由医生/药剂师/护士三人组组成的多学科药物审查会议。干预措施主要针对养老院的老年人,但此类评估也可使复杂慢性病患者受益。

试验注册

PROSPERO 注册:CRD42022334685。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e7d/10470127/8e6346c8cc63/12913_2023_9512_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e7d/10470127/d823d66d76ab/12913_2023_9512_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e7d/10470127/8e6346c8cc63/12913_2023_9512_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e7d/10470127/d823d66d76ab/12913_2023_9512_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e7d/10470127/8e6346c8cc63/12913_2023_9512_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Intervention of pharmacist included in multidisciplinary team to reduce adverse drug event: a qualitative systematic review.多学科团队中纳入药师干预以减少药物不良事件:一项定性系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):927. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09512-6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Community-based care for the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的2型糖尿病管理:循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(23):1-40. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
6
Cost avoidance of pharmacist-led deprescribing using STOPPFrail for older adults in nursing homes.使用 STOPPFrail 减少养老院中老年人的药师主导药物减量的成本。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1163-1171. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01749-3. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
7
Impact on Patient Outcomes of Pharmacist Participation in Multidisciplinary Critical Care Teams: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药师参与多学科危重病护理团队对患者结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1243-1250. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003830.
8
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.基于家庭的、由护士主导的老年人健康促进的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(20):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta16200.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and economic outcomes of multidisciplinary team members in primary care: a scoping review.基层医疗中多学科团队成员的临床和经济成果:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 5;25(1):1025. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13243-1.
2
Impact of collaborative pharmaceutical care on older inpatients' medication safety: multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (MEDREV Study).协作药学服务对老年住院患者用药安全的影响:多中心阶梯楔形整群随机试验(MEDREV研究)
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06122-1.
3
Therapeutic Education and Pharmacotherapeutic Follow-Up Protocol, a Useful Tool for the Improvement of Patients at Cardiovascular Risk in Community Pharmacies.

本文引用的文献

1
[The role of the community and hospital pharmacist in public health prevention in France].[法国社区和医院药剂师在公共卫生预防中的作用]
Ann Pharm Fr. 2022 Nov;80(6):769-777. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Effects of an interprofessional deprescribing intervention in Swiss nursing homes: the Individual Deprescribing Intervention (IDeI) randomised controlled trial.瑞士养老院中开展的一项跨专业药物精简干预措施的效果:个体药物精简干预(IDeI)随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02465-7.
3
Geriatric Assessment-Driven Intervention (GAIN) on Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in Older Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
治疗教育与药物治疗随访方案,改善社区药房心血管疾病风险患者的有用工具。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 20;12(3):80. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030080.
4
Advancements in Managing Choledocholithiasis and Acute Cholangitis in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Review.老年患者胆总管结石及急性胆管炎管理的进展:一项综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 4;17(2):e78492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78492. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Achievement of guideline-based lipid goals among very-high-risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: results in 213,380 individuals from the cvMOBIUS2 registry.在患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和2型糖尿病的极高风险患者中实现基于指南的血脂目标:来自cvMOBIUS2注册研究的213,380例个体的结果
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Dec 21;21:100921. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100921. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Economic impact and clinical benefits of clinical pharmacy interventions: A six-year multi-center study using an innovative medication management tool.临床药学干预的经济影响和临床效益:一项使用创新药物管理工具的为期六年的多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0311707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311707. eCollection 2025.
7
Cost-effectiveness in an interprofessional training ward within a university department for internal medicine: a monocentric open-label controlled study of the A-STAR Regensburg.内科大学系内跨专业培训病房的成本效益:A-STAR 雷根斯堡的单中心开放性对照研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1340953. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1340953. eCollection 2024.
8
Toxicity Derived from Interaction between Natural Compounds and Cancer Therapeutic Drugs Metabolized by CYP3A4: Lessons Learned from Two Clinical Case Reports.天然化合物与 CYP3A4 代谢的癌症治疗药物相互作用导致的毒性:来自两个临床病例报告的经验教训。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 5;24(21):15976. doi: 10.3390/ijms242115976.
老年综合评估驱动干预(GAIN)对癌症老年患者化疗相关毒性的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;7(11):e214158. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4158. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a people-centred care model for community-living older people versus usual care ─ A randomised controlled trial.以患者为中心的护理模式与常规护理对社区老年人的有效性和成本效益 ─ 一项随机对照试验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jun;18(6):3004-3012. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.025. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
The Impact of Pharmaceutical Care in Multidisciplinary Teams on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多学科团队中药物治疗管理对健康结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Dec;22(12):2518-2526. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.038. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
6
Cancer Aging Research Group (CARG) score in older adults undergoing curative intent chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study.老年癌症患者接受根治性化疗时的癌症与衰老研究组(CARG)评分:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e047376. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047376.
7
Drug related problems in clinical practice: a cross-sectional study on their prevalence, risk factors and associated pharmaceutical interventions.临床实践中的药物相关问题:一项横断面研究其患病率、风险因素及相关药物干预措施。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80560-2.
8
Pharmacist Identification of Medication Therapy Problems Involving Cognition Among Older Adults Followed by a Home-Based Care Team.药剂师识别涉及认知的老年人药物治疗问题,由家庭护理团队跟进。
Drugs Aging. 2021 Feb;38(2):157-168. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00821-7. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
Standards in medication review: An international perspective.药物评估标准:国际视角
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2020 Jul 14;153(4):215-223. doi: 10.1177/1715163520929665. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
10
Internet-Based Medication Management Services Improve Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.基于互联网的药物管理服务可改善 2 型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白水平。
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Jun;27(6):686-693. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0123. Epub 2020 Sep 9.