文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

老年癌症患者接受根治性化疗时的癌症与衰老研究组(CARG)评分:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Cancer Aging Research Group (CARG) score in older adults undergoing curative intent chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e047376. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047376.


DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047376
PMID:34187825
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8245449/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The Cancer Aging Research Group (CARG) toxicity score is used to assess toxicity risk in geriatric patients receiving chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to validate the CARG score in geriatric patients treated with curative intent chemotherapy in predicting grade 3-5 toxicities. DESIGN: This was a longitudinal prospective observational study. SETTING: Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, a tertiary cancer care referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: Patients, aged ≥65 years, with gastrointestinal, breast or gynaecological stage I-III cancers being planned for curative intent chemotherapy. A total of 270 patients were required for accrual in the study. EXPOSURES: Total risk score ranged from 0 (lowest toxicity risk) to 19 (highest toxicity risk). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate whether the CARG risk score predicted for grade 3-5 toxicities. RESULTS: The study cohort of 270 patients had a mean age of 69 (65-83) years, with the most common cancers being gastrointestinal (79%). Fifty-two per cent of patients had atleast one grade 3-5 toxicity. The risk of toxicity was increased with an increasing risk score (42% low risk, 51% medium risk and 79% high risk; p<0.001). There was no association between either Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p=0.69) or age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (p=0.79) risk categories and grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study validates the CARG risk score in predicting for grade 3-5 toxicities in geriatric oncology patients receiving curative intent chemotherapy and can be considered as the standard of care before planning chemotherapy in every elderly patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2016/10/007357; Results.

摘要

重要性:癌症衰老研究组(CARG)毒性评分用于评估接受化疗的老年患者的毒性风险。 目的:主要目的是验证 CARG 评分在接受根治性化疗的老年患者中预测 3-5 级毒性的能力。 设计:这是一项纵向前瞻性观察性研究。 地点:印度孟买的塔塔纪念医院,这是一家三级癌症治疗转诊中心。 参与者:年龄≥65 岁、患有胃肠道、乳腺或妇科 I-III 期癌症、计划接受根治性化疗的患者。该研究需要招募 270 名患者。 暴露因素:总风险评分范围为 0(最低毒性风险)至 19(最高毒性风险)。 主要结果和测量:研究的主要终点是评估 CARG 风险评分是否预测 3-5 级毒性。 结果:该研究队列的 270 名患者平均年龄为 69(65-83)岁,最常见的癌症是胃肠道(79%)。52%的患者至少有 1 种 3-5 级毒性。随着风险评分的增加,毒性风险增加(低风险 42%,中风险 51%,高风险 79%;p<0.001)。ECOG 表现状态(p=0.69)或年龄调整后的 Charlson 合并症指数(p=0.79)风险类别与 3-5 级化疗毒性之间均无关联。 结论和相关性:本研究验证了 CARG 风险评分在预测接受根治性化疗的老年肿瘤患者 3-5 级毒性方面的有效性,并且可以在为每位老年患者计划化疗之前被视为标准护理。 试验注册编号:CTRI/2016/10/007357;结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20ac/8245449/cf49888401cd/bmjopen-2020-047376f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20ac/8245449/cf49888401cd/bmjopen-2020-047376f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20ac/8245449/cf49888401cd/bmjopen-2020-047376f01.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Cancer Aging Research Group (CARG) score in older adults undergoing curative intent chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study.

BMJ Open. 2021-6-29

[2]
Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults: Comparing the predictive value of the CARG Toxicity Score with oncologists' estimates of toxicity based on clinical judgement.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2018-9-14

[3]
Predicting the Risks of Aggressive-Intent Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Patients With Lymphoma: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022-8

[4]
Assessing the ability of the Cancer and Aging Research Group tool to predict chemotherapy toxicity in older Japanese patients: A prospective observational study.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2024-7

[5]
Predicting Chemotherapy-Related Adverse Events in Elderly Cancer Patients with Prior Anticancer Therapy.

Curr Oncol. 2022-3-23

[6]
Prospective comparison of the value of CARG, G8, and VES-13 toxicity tools in predicting chemotherapy-related toxicity in older Turkish patients with cancer.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2022-7

[7]
External Validity of Two Scores for Predicting the Risk of Chemotherapy Toxicity Among Older Patients With Solid Tumors: Results From the ELCAPA Prospective Cohort.

Oncologist. 2023-6-2

[8]
Geriatric assessment is associated with completion of chemotherapy, toxicity, and survival in older adults with cancer.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2013-7

[9]
The predictive value of G8 and the Cancer and aging research group chemotherapy toxicity tool in treatment-related toxicity in older Chinese patients with cancer.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2021-5

[10]
A comparison of the CARG tool, the VES-13, and oncologist judgment in predicting grade 3+ toxicities in men undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2017-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Validation of a Chemotherapy Toxicity Prediction Model in Older Adults With Cancer in Taiwan.

Cancer Control. 2025

[2]
UK national observational cohort study investigating Tolerance of Anti-cancer Systemic Therapy in the Elderly: the TOASTIE study.

BMJ Oncol. 2024-8-29

[3]
Digital innovations in breast cancer care: exploring the potential and challenges of digital therapeutics and clinical decision support systems.

Digit Health. 2024-11-3

[4]
Safety of solid oncology drugs in older patients: a narrative review.

ESMO Open. 2024-11

[5]
Differential Effects of a Telemonitoring Platform in the Development of Chemotherapy-Associated Toxicity: A Randomized Trial Protocol.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024-3-14

[6]
Key Considerations for the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer in Older Adults: An Expert Consensus of the Canadian Treatment Landscape.

Curr Oncol. 2023-12-26

[7]
Assessing Frailty in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Two Diseases in One?

Curr Oncol Rep. 2024-1

[8]
The current status of geriatric oncology in India.

Ecancermedicalscience. 2023-8-31

[9]
Intervention of pharmacist included in multidisciplinary team to reduce adverse drug event: a qualitative systematic review.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023-8-30

[10]
HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment in the First-Line Setting: Expert Review.

Curr Oncol. 2023-6-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Prospective comparison of the value of CRASH and CARG toxicity scores in predicting chemotherapy toxicity in geriatric oncology.

Oncol Lett. 2019-11

[2]
Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults: Comparing the predictive value of the CARG Toxicity Score with oncologists' estimates of toxicity based on clinical judgement.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2018-9-14

[3]
Patient- and tumor-related predictors of chemotherapy intolerance in older patients with cancer: A systematic review.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2018-4-26

[4]
The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a better predictor of survival in operated lung cancer patients than the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018-1-1

[5]
Association between Charlson comorbidity index score and outcome in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer.

BMC Pulm Med. 2017-8-15

[6]
Challenge of cancer in the elderly.

ESMO Open. 2016-4-12

[7]
A comparison of the CARG tool, the VES-13, and oncologist judgment in predicting grade 3+ toxicities in men undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2017-1

[8]
Validation of a Prediction Tool for Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer.

J Clin Oncol. 2016-7-10

[9]
Patterns of care in geriatric cancer patients - An audit from a rural based hospital cancer registry in Kerala.

Indian J Cancer. 2015

[10]
Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with lung cancer.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2013-6-14

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索