Suppr超能文献

用于慢性腰痛治疗的远程康复:一项随机对照试验。

Telerehabilitation for the treatment in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Villatoro-Luque Francisco Jesús, Rodríguez-Almagro Daniel, Aibar-Almazán Agustín, Fernández-Carnero Samuel, Pecos-Martín Daniel, Ibáñez-Vera Alfonso Javier, Castro-Martín Eduardo, Achalandabaso-Ochoa Alexander

机构信息

Physiotherapy and Pain Group, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Medicine, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Jun;31(5):637-646. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231195091. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

Abstract

IntroductionAlthough there is growth in the approach to telerehabilitation (TLRH) in different pathologies, research on TLRH for the management of low back pain is scarce and controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze whether a TLRH program is as effective as a clinical exercise program in improving pain and different functional variables in patients with nonspecific low back pain (NLBP).MethodA single-blind, two-armed randomized controlled trial was carried out with 68 individuals with chronic NLBP. Participants were randomly allocated to either the TLRH group (TG) ( = 34) or the clinic group (CG) ( = 34). The TG received an exercise-based TLRH video and an educational program on the neurophysiology of pain. The CG received the same pain education and exercise program at the clinic facility supervised by a clinician. Both groups performed 2 weekly sessions for 8 weeks. Active movements of the lumbar spine, pain and range of motion, and kinesiophobia were assessed at baseline, at the end of 8 weeks of treatment, and at 3 months.ResultsStatistically significant differences for time-by-group interaction were identified in range of motion of right ( = 11.668;  = 0.001) and left ( = 4.219;  = 0.042) legs when knee extended test is performed; as well as in pain intensity when the same test ( = 5.176;  = 0.043). Moreover, higher pain level during flexion ( = 5.133;  = 0.009) and extension movements ( = 6.335;  = 0.003) in patients with bilateral pain location than those with unilateral or central pain location has been appreciated.ConclusionA TLRH rehabilitation program via mobile app is as effective as the same exercise program supervised in a clinic.

摘要

引言

尽管在不同病症的远程康复(TLRH)方法上有所发展,但针对腰痛管理的TLRH研究却很少且存在争议。因此,本研究的目的是分析TLRH计划在改善非特异性腰痛(NLBP)患者的疼痛和不同功能变量方面是否与临床运动计划一样有效。

方法

对68名慢性NLBP患者进行了一项单盲、双臂随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到TLRH组(TG)(n = 34)或临床组(CG)(n = 34)。TG组接受基于运动的TLRH视频和关于疼痛神经生理学的教育计划。CG组在临床设施中由临床医生监督接受相同的疼痛教育和运动计划。两组均每周进行2次训练,共8周。在基线、治疗8周结束时和3个月时评估腰椎的主动运动、疼痛和活动范围以及运动恐惧。

结果

在进行膝关节伸展试验时,右(F = 11.668;P = 0.001)腿和左(F = 4.219;P = 0.042)腿活动范围的组间时间交互作用存在统计学显著差异;在进行相同试验时疼痛强度也存在差异(F = 5.176;P = 0.043)。此外,与单侧或中央疼痛部位的患者相比,双侧疼痛部位患者在屈曲(F = 5.133;P = 0.009)和伸展运动(F = 6.335;P = 0.003)时的疼痛水平更高。

结论

通过移动应用程序的TLRH康复计划与在诊所监督下的相同运动计划一样有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验