Digital Promise, Washington, DC, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2024 Jul-Aug;57(4):242-254. doi: 10.1177/00222194231195624. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
This study analyzed performance, process, and survey data of eighth graders with learning disabilities (LDs) who took the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) digital math test. Compared with students with LDs who did not receive extended time accommodations (ETAs), students with LDs who received and used ETA scored significantly higher on the test, whereas students with LDs who received but did not use ETA scored significantly lower on the test. In addition, students with LDs in the two ETA groups reported a lower level of perceived time pressure and a higher level of math interest and enjoyment than their peers who did not receive ETA. For students with LDs who received ETA, optimal performance was achieved with 50% additional time, while their peers who did not receive ETA typically performed best when utilizing most of their allotted time. The analysis of process data revealed that students with LDs who used ETA performed more actions, had a higher number of revisits, used universal design digital tools more frequently, and performed better on time-consuming items than their peers who did not receive ETA at the same level of math performance.
本研究分析了参加 2017 年全国教育进展评估(NAEP)数字数学测试的八年级学习障碍(LD)学生的表现、过程和调查数据。与未获得延长时间适应(ETA)的 LD 学生相比,获得并使用 ETA 的 LD 学生在测试中得分显著更高,而获得但未使用 ETA 的 LD 学生在测试中得分显著更低。此外,在两个 ETA 组中的 LD 学生报告称,他们感受到的时间压力水平较低,对数学的兴趣和享受程度较高,而未获得 ETA 的同龄人则较低。对于获得 ETA 的 LD 学生来说,获得 50%的额外时间可以实现最佳表现,而未获得 ETA 的同龄人则通常在利用大部分规定时间时表现最佳。对过程数据的分析表明,使用 ETA 的 LD 学生比未获得 ETA 的同龄人在相同的数学表现水平上执行了更多的操作,有更多的回访,更频繁地使用通用设计数字工具,并且在耗时项目上表现更好。