Suppr超能文献

用于延迟动脉环测试的动脉储存条件比较。

Comparison of arterial storage conditions for delayed arterial ring testing.

作者信息

McLaughlin Dylan K, Hoffmann Carson, Sasaki Maiko, Li Feifei, Ma Jing, Cui Xiangqin, Sutliff Roy L, Brewster Luke P

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Surgical and Research Services, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA.

出版信息

JVS Vasc Sci. 2023 Jul 20;4:100122. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100122. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Arterial ring testing is the gold standard for measuring arterial function. Increased arterial tone through arterial contraction and impaired endothelial relaxation (endothelial dysfunction) are key metrics of impaired arterial health in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). To allow for comparative testing of arteries during standard laboratory hours, storage buffers and conditions have been used to extend the functional life of arteries. Various storage conditions have been compared, but there has not been a robust comparison or validation in human arteries. The objective of this work is to optimize storage of arterial segments for endothelial cell (EC) testing in a murine model and to test EC function in human PAD arteries. We hypothesized that certain storage conditions would be superior to others.

METHODS

Healthy murine aortas were harvested from 10- to 14-week-old C57/Bl6J male and female mice and compared under different storage protocols (24 hours) to immediate arterial testing. The storage conditions tested were: Opti-MEM (37°C or 4°C), Krebs-HEPES with 1.8 mmol/L or 2.5 mmol/L calcium (4°C), or Wisconsin (WI) solution at 4°C. Vascular function was evaluated by isometric force testing. Endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxation were measured after precontraction with addition of methacholine or sodium nitroprusside, respectively. Arterial contraction was stimulated with potassium chloride or phenylephrine. Analysis of variance was used to determine significance compared with immediate testing with  < .05. Under institutional review board approval, 28 PAD arteries were collected at amputation and underwent vascular function testing as described. Disturbed flow conditions were determined by indirect (upstream occlusion) flow to the harvested tibial arteries. Stable flow arteries had in-line flow. Arterial calcification was quantified manually as present or not present.

RESULTS

We found that 4°C WI and 37°C Opti-MEM best preserved endothelium-dependent relaxation and performed similarly to immediately testing aortas (termed fresh for freshly tested) ( > .95). Other storage conditions were inferior to freshly tested aortas ( < .05). Vascular smooth muscle function was tested by endothelial-independent relaxation and contractility. All storage conditions preserved endothelial-independent relaxation and contractility similar to freshly tested arteries. However, 4°C WI and 37°C Opti-MEM storage conditions most closely approximated the maximum force of contraction of freshly tested arteries in response to potassium chloride ( > .39). For human arterial testing, 28 tibial arteries were tested for relaxation and contraction with 16 arteries with peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAD with disturbed flow) and 12 without peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAD with stable flow), of which 14 were calcified and 14 were noncalcified. Endothelial-dependent relaxation data was measurable in 9 arteries and arterial contraction data was measurable in 14 arteries. When comparing flow conditions, arteries exposed to disturbed flow (n = 4) had significantly less relaxation (2% vs 59%;  = .03) compared with stable flow conditions (n = 5). In contrast, presence the (n = 6) or absence of calcification (n = 3) did not impact arterial relaxation. Arterial contraction was not different between groups in either comparison by flow (n = 9 disturbed; n = 5 stable) or calcification (n = 6 present; n = 8 absent).

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy murine aortas, arterial storage for 24 hours in 4°C WI or 37°C Opti-MEM both preserved endothelium-dependent relaxation and maximum force of contraction. In human PAD arteries stored in 4° WI, flow conditions before arterial harvest, but not arterial calcification, led to differences in arterial relaxation in human PAD arteries. Arterial contractility was more robust (11/28 arteries) compared with arterial relaxation (7/28 arteries), but was not significantly different under flow or calcification parameters. This work defines ideal storage conditions for arterial ring testing and identifies that EC dysfunction from disturbed flow may persist in delayed ex vivo arterial testing.

摘要

目的

动脉环测试是测量动脉功能的金标准。通过动脉收缩导致动脉张力增加以及内皮舒张功能受损(内皮功能障碍)是外周动脉疾病(PAD)中动脉健康受损的关键指标。为了能够在标准实验室时间内对动脉进行比较测试,已使用储存缓冲液和条件来延长动脉的功能寿命。已对各种储存条件进行了比较,但尚未在人体动脉中进行有力的比较或验证。这项工作的目的是优化在小鼠模型中用于内皮细胞(EC)测试的动脉段储存,并测试人类PAD动脉中的EC功能。我们假设某些储存条件会优于其他条件。

方法

从10至14周龄的C57/Bl6J雄性和雌性小鼠中采集健康的小鼠主动脉,并在不同的储存方案(24小时)下与立即进行动脉测试进行比较。测试的储存条件为:Opti-MEM(37°C或4°C)、含1.8 mmol/L或2.5 mmol/L钙的Krebs-HEPES(4°C)或4°C的威斯康星(WI)溶液。通过等长力测试评估血管功能。在用乙酰甲胆碱或硝普钠预收缩后,分别测量内皮依赖性和非依赖性舒张。用氯化钾或去氧肾上腺素刺激动脉收缩。方差分析用于确定与立即测试相比的显著性,P <.05。在机构审查委员会批准下,在截肢时收集28条PAD动脉,并按上述方法进行血管功能测试。通过对采集的胫动脉的间接(上游阻塞)血流确定紊乱血流情况。稳定血流动脉具有直线血流。手动定量动脉钙化情况为存在或不存在。

结果

我们发现4°C的WI和37°C的Opti-MEM能最好地保留内皮依赖性舒张,并且与立即测试主动脉(称为新鲜测试)的效果相似(P >.95)。其他储存条件不如新鲜测试的主动脉(P <.05)。通过非内皮依赖性舒张和收缩性测试血管平滑肌功能。所有储存条件下保留的非内皮依赖性舒张和收缩性与新鲜测试的动脉相似。然而,4°C的WI和37°C的Opti-MEM储存条件最接近新鲜测试动脉对氯化钾反应的最大收缩力(P >.39)。对于人体动脉测试,对28条胫动脉进行了舒张和收缩测试,其中16条患有外周动脉闭塞性疾病(PAD伴紊乱血流),12条没有外周动脉闭塞性疾病(PAD伴稳定血流),其中14条有钙化,14条无钙化。在9条动脉中可测量到内皮依赖性舒张数据,在14条动脉中可测量到动脉收缩数据。当比较血流情况时,与稳定血流情况(n = 5)相比,暴露于紊乱血流的动脉(n = 4)的舒张明显减少(2%对59%;P =.03)。相比之下,钙化的存在(n = 6)或不存在(n = 3)对动脉舒张没有影响。在血流(n = 9紊乱;n = 5稳定)或钙化(n = 6存在;n = 8不存在)的任何一种比较中,各组之间的动脉收缩没有差异。

结论

在健康的小鼠主动脉中,在4°C的WI或37°C的Opti-MEM中储存24小时均可保留内皮依赖性舒张和最大收缩力。在4°C的WI中储存的人类PAD动脉中,动脉采集前的血流情况而非动脉钙化导致人类PAD动脉舒张存在差异。与动脉舒张(7/28条动脉)相比,动脉收缩性更强(11/28条动脉),但在血流或钙化参数下没有显著差异。这项工作定义了动脉环测试的理想储存条件,并确定紊乱血流导致的EC功能障碍可能在延迟的体外动脉测试中持续存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7c/10463248/3b8b21181811/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验