Suppr超能文献

数字化和验证开咬检查表宣言:迈向人工智能的一步。

Digitization and validation of the open bite checklist manifesto: a step toward artificial intelligence.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;94(1):51-58. doi: 10.2319/032923-225.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To introduce and validate newly designed computer software to aid in the diagnosis of anterior open bite (AOB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The software was constructed based on the algorithm of a standardized open bite checklist, which considered skeletal, dental, and soft tissue components, as well as smile characteristics. Feeding the software with this input yielded a digital form output (DFO) in the guise of a diagnostic report characterizing the AOB phenotype, contributing components, severity, associated problems, and functional factors. For validation, DFO was compared to a conventional form output (CFO), created in a standardized manner according to expert opinions. Agreement between the DFO and CFO in terms of AOB phenotype was the primary outcome, while the secondary outcome was the number of missing diagnostic components in either method.

RESULTS

Percentage of agreement between CFO and DFO was 82.2%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.78, which is considered a good level of agreement. There was a statistically significant relationship between the number of missing diagnostic components in CFO and level of disagreement, which rendered the DFO more reliable.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly constructed software represents an efficient and valid diagnostic tool for AOB and its contributing components. There was good agreement between CFO and DFO, with the latter being more comprehensive and reliable. The algorithm built in the software can be used as the basis for a future artificial intelligence model to aid in the diagnosis of AOB.

摘要

目的

介绍并验证新设计的计算机软件,以辅助诊断前牙开颌(AOB)。

材料与方法

该软件基于标准化开颌检查表的算法构建,考虑了骨骼、牙齿和软组织成分以及微笑特征。将这些输入信息输入软件,生成以诊断报告形式呈现的数字输出(DFO),用于描述 AOB 表型、相关成分、严重程度、伴随问题和功能因素。为了验证,将 DFO 与根据专家意见以标准化方式创建的传统表格输出(CFO)进行比较。DFO 和 CFO 在 AOB 表型方面的一致性是主要结果,而次要结果是两种方法中缺失的诊断成分数量。

结果

CFO 和 DFO 之间的一致性百分比为 82.2%,kappa 系数为 0.78,被认为是一致性较好的水平。CFO 中缺失诊断成分的数量与不一致程度之间存在统计学显著关系,这使得 DFO 更可靠。

结论

新构建的软件是 AOB 及其相关成分的有效且有效的诊断工具。CFO 和 DFO 之间具有良好的一致性,后者更全面、更可靠。软件中构建的算法可用于未来人工智能模型的基础,以辅助 AOB 的诊断。

相似文献

2
Diagnostic model of anterior open bite--a new way to predict skeletal type: a cross-sectional study.
Int Orthod. 2014 Sep;12(3):358-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
4
Tooth size discrepancy in orthodontic patients with skeletal anterior open bite.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Dec;8(6):1516-1522. doi: 10.1002/cre2.647. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
5
Anterior open bite - diagnostics and therapy.
Acta Chir Plast. 2021 Winter;63(4):181-184. doi: 10.48095/ccachp2021181.
7
A new cephalometric diagnostic method for Down's Syndrome patients with open bite.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Mar 1;13(3):E171-5.
10
Stability of anterior open bite treatment with bonded spurs associated with high-pull chincup.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2018 May;21(2):104-111. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12223. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning-based decision support system for orthognathic diagnosis and treatment planning.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04063-6.
2
Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: Where are we now? A scoping review.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec;24 Suppl 2:6-15. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12517. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review.
Prog Orthod. 2021 Jul 5;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00361-9.
4
Machine learning and orthodontics, current trends and the future opportunities: A scoping review.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Aug;160(2):170-192.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
5
Clinical decision support systems in orthodontics: A narrative review of data science approaches.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec;24 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):26-36. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12492. Epub 2021 May 24.
9
Dentoalveolar Heights in Vertical and Sagittal Facial Patterns.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Sep;26(9):753-7.
10
Influence of lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):206-10. doi: 10.2319/011214-41.1. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验