Suppr超能文献

不同矫治器对早期治疗前牙开合的牙牙槽效应:一项随机临床试验。

Dentoalveolar effects produced by different appliances on early treatment of anterior open bite: A randomized clinical trial.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2018 Nov;88(6):684-691. doi: 10.2319/101317-691.1. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

: To compare different appliances for early anterior open bite (AOB) correction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

: This was a parallel, randomized clinical trial. A prospective sample of patients with AOB was recruited consecutively. Eligibility criteria included angle class I malocclusion with AOB equal to or greater than 1 mm. Participants were allocated by simple randomization to 4 groups: bonded spurs, chin cup, fixed palatal crib, and removable palatal crib. Dentoalveolar changes among the groups were assessed by blinded observers by comparing lateral cephalograms taken before (T1) and 12 months after treatment (T2; analysis of variance followed by Tukey test). Of the measurements, 30% were reassessed for reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman agreement test; α = 5%; 95% confidence interval).

RESULTS

: A total of 99 patients with a mean AOB of 3.7 mm (mean age 8.4 ± 0.8 years, both genders) were recruited. Dropouts occurred in all the groups, yielding a final sample size of 81 analyzed individuals. Intergroup comparisons of differences (T2-T1) showed significant differences for the incisor positioning variables (1.1, 1-PP, 6-PP, IMPA, 1.NB and 1-GoMe). However, there was no significant difference in AOB reduction among the groups, with an average correction of 3.1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

: All of the tested devices promoted dental changes, especially in the anterior region, and contributed to AOB reduction during the study period. However, fixed palatal crib demonstrated greater impact on the positioning of the incisors.

摘要

目的

比较早期前牙开颌(AOB)矫正的不同装置。

材料和方法

这是一项平行、随机临床试验。连续招募了具有 AOB 的患者的前瞻性样本。纳入标准包括Angle Ⅰ类错颌,AOB 等于或大于 1mm。参与者通过简单随机分配到 4 个组:粘结支抗、颏兜、固定腭托和可摘腭托。通过比较治疗前(T1)和治疗后 12 个月(T2)的侧位头颅侧位片,由盲法观察者评估各组的牙牙槽变化(方差分析后 Tukey 检验)。对于这些测量值,30%进行了可靠性再评估(组内相关系数和 Bland-Altman 一致性检验;α=5%;95%置信区间)。

结果

共招募了 99 例 AOB 平均为 3.7mm(平均年龄 8.4±0.8 岁,男女各半)的患者。所有组均出现脱落,最终分析了 81 例个体。组间差异(T2-T1)的比较显示,切牙定位变量(1.1、1-PP、6-PP、IMPA、1.NB 和 1-GoMe)存在显著差异。然而,各组之间 AOB 的减少没有显著差异,平均矫正量为 3.1mm。

结论

所有测试的装置都促进了牙齿的变化,特别是在前部区域,并在研究期间有助于 AOB 的减少。然而,固定腭托对切牙的定位影响更大。

相似文献

6
Comparison of 2 early treatment protocols for open-bite malocclusions.两种开牙合错牙合早期治疗方案的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):743-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.045.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Randomization. Part 1: sequence generation.随机化。第1部分:序列生成。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):747-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.020.
10
The evidence pyramid and introduction to randomized controlled trials.证据金字塔与随机对照试验介绍
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3):446-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验