• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与威胁相关的注意捕获的指导性学习受状态焦虑的调节。

Instructional learning of threat-related attentional capture is modulated by state anxiety.

作者信息

Grégoire Laurent, Anderson Brian A

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University.

出版信息

Emotion. 2024 Mar;24(2):531-537. doi: 10.1037/emo0001291. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1037/emo0001291
PMID:37650791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10902188/
Abstract

The present study aimed to determine whether persistent threat-related attentional capture can result from instructional learning, when participants acquire knowledge of the aversive qualities of a stimulus through verbal instruction. Fifty-four nonclinical adults first performed a visual search task in which a green or red circle was presented as a target. They were instructed that one of these two colors might be paired with an electric shock if they responded slowly or inaccurately, whereas the other color was never associated with shock. However, no shocks were actually delivered. In a subsequent test phase, in which participants were explicitly informed that shocks were no longer possible, former-target-color stimuli were presented as distractors in a visual search task for a shape-defined target. In both tasks, although participants were never exposed to the electric shock, we observed a significant correlation between threat-related attentional priority and state anxiety. Our results demonstrate that exposure to a stimulus with the belief that it could be threatening is sufficient to generate a persistent attentional bias toward that stimulus, but this effect is modulated by state anxiety. Attentional biases for fear-relevant stimuli have been implicated in anxiety disorders, and our findings demonstrate that for anxious participants, attentional biases can be entirely the product of erroneous beliefs concerning the linking between stimuli and possible outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究旨在确定当参与者通过言语指令获得关于刺激厌恶性质的知识时,持续性的威胁相关注意捕获是否会由指导性学习导致。54名非临床成年人首先进行了一项视觉搜索任务,其中呈现一个绿色或红色圆圈作为目标。他们被告知,如果他们反应缓慢或不准确,这两种颜色中的一种可能会与电击配对,而另一种颜色则与电击无关。然而,实际上并未施加电击。在随后的测试阶段,明确告知参与者电击不再可能发生,之前的目标颜色刺激在一项针对形状定义目标的视觉搜索任务中作为干扰物呈现。在这两项任务中,尽管参与者从未接触过电击,但我们观察到威胁相关注意优先级与状态焦虑之间存在显著相关性。我们的结果表明,相信一种刺激可能具有威胁性就足以产生对该刺激的持续性注意偏向,但这种效应会受到状态焦虑的调节。对恐惧相关刺激的注意偏向与焦虑症有关,我们的研究结果表明,对于焦虑的参与者来说,注意偏向可能完全是关于刺激与可能结果之间联系的错误信念的产物。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Instructional learning of threat-related attentional capture is modulated by state anxiety.与威胁相关的注意捕获的指导性学习受状态焦虑的调节。
Emotion. 2024 Mar;24(2):531-537. doi: 10.1037/emo0001291. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
2
Rapid attentional biases to threat-associated visual features: The roles of anxiety and visual working memory access.快速注意偏向于与威胁相关的视觉特征:焦虑和视觉工作记忆访问的作用。
Emotion. 2022 Apr;22(3):545-553. doi: 10.1037/emo0000761. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
3
Motivated suppression of value- and threat-modulated attentional capture.动机抑制价值和威胁调节的注意力捕获。
Emotion. 2022 Jun;22(4):780-794. doi: 10.1037/emo0000777. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
You do it to yourself: Attentional capture by threat-signaling stimuli persists even when entirely counterproductive.你自找的:即使威胁信号刺激完全没有效果,注意也会被其捕获。
Emotion. 2021 Dec;21(8):1691-1698. doi: 10.1037/emo0001003. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
5
Observational learning of threat-related attentional bias.观察性学习与威胁相关的注意偏向。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Aug;38(5):789-800. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2317917. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Fear not! Anxiety biases attentional enhancement of threat without impairing working memory filtering.不必担心!焦虑会使注意力偏向于对威胁的增强,但不会损害工作记忆过滤功能。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Dec;20(6):1248-1260. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00831-3. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
Punishment-modulated attentional capture is context specific.惩罚调节的注意捕获具有情境特异性。
Motiv Sci. 2021 Jun;7(2):165-175. doi: 10.1037/mot0000211. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
Learned prioritization yields attentional biases through selection history.习得性优先级通过选择历史产生注意力偏差。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2244-2256. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-01970-y.
9
Primary rewards and aversive outcomes have comparable effects on attentional bias.正性奖赏和负性结果对注意偏向具有同等影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2023 Apr;137(2):89-94. doi: 10.1037/bne0000543. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
The influence of threat on the efficiency of goal-directed attentional control.威胁对目标导向注意控制效率的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):980-986. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01321-4. Epub 2020 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Observational learning of threat-related attentional bias.观察性学习与威胁相关的注意偏向。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Aug;38(5):789-800. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2317917. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.重新审视三分法:注意控制的整体理论。
Vision Res. 2024 Apr;217:108366. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108366. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional biases in human anxiety.人类焦虑中的注意偏差。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Nov;142:104917. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104917. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Punishment-modulated attentional capture is context specific.惩罚调节的注意捕获具有情境特异性。
Motiv Sci. 2021 Jun;7(2):165-175. doi: 10.1037/mot0000211. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
You do it to yourself: Attentional capture by threat-signaling stimuli persists even when entirely counterproductive.你自找的:即使威胁信号刺激完全没有效果,注意也会被其捕获。
Emotion. 2021 Dec;21(8):1691-1698. doi: 10.1037/emo0001003. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
4
Verbal threat learning does not spare loved ones.言语威胁学习不会放过亲人。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 9;11(1):5469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84921-3.
5
How does the attention system learn from aversive outcomes?注意系统如何从厌恶的结果中学习?
Emotion. 2021 Jun;21(4):898-903. doi: 10.1037/emo0000757. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
The impact of trauma exposure on explicit and implicit memory.创伤暴露对外显记忆和内隐记忆的影响。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2020 Jan;33(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2019.1664477. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
7
Fear of the known: semantic generalisation of fear conditioning across languages in bilinguals.对已知的恐惧:双语者恐惧条件反射在语言间的语义泛化。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Mar;34(2):352-358. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1604319. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli.注意指向威胁性刺激的自动性。
Emotion. 2020 Sep;20(6):1109-1112. doi: 10.1037/emo0000596. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Does repetitive negative thinking affect attention? Differential effects of worry and rumination on attention to emotional stimuli.重复性消极思维是否会影响注意力?担忧和沉思对情绪刺激注意力的影响有何不同。
Emotion. 2019 Dec;19(8):1450-1462. doi: 10.1037/emo0000535. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
Opening the reconsolidation window using the mind's eye: Extinction training during reconsolidation disrupts fear memory expression following mental imagery reactivation.用意念打开再巩固窗口:再巩固期间的消退训练会破坏心理意象重新激活后恐惧记忆的表达。
Cognition. 2019 Feb;183:277-281. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 7.