Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Jan;41(1-2):186-198. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0133. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
The purpose of this study was to extend previous research by examining the relationship between lifetime blast exposure and neurobehavioral functioning after mild TBI (MTBI) by (a) using a comprehensive measure of lifetime blast exposure, and (b) controlling for the influence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Participants were 103 United States service members and veterans (SMVs) with a medically documented diagnosis of MTBI, recruited from three military treatment facilities (74.8%) and community-based recruitment initiatives (25.2%, e.g., social media, flyers). Participants completed a battery of neurobehavioral measures 12 or more months post-injury (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, PTSD-Checklist PCLC, TBI-Quality of Life), including the Blast Exposure Threshold Survey (BETS). The sample was classified into two lifetime blast exposure (LBE) groups: High ( = 57) and Low ( = 46) LBE. In addition, the sample was classified into four LBE/PTSD subgroups: High PTSD/High LBE (n = 38); High PTSD/Low LBE ( = 19); Low PTSD/High LBE ( = 19); and Low PTSD/Low LBE ( = 27). The High LBE group had consistently worse scores on all neurobehavioral measures compared with the Low LBE group. When controlling for the influence of PTSD (using ANCOVA), however, only a handful of group differences remained. When comparing measures across the four LBE/PTSD subgroups, in the absence of clinically meaningful PTSD symptoms (i.e., Low PTSD), participants with High LBE had worse scores on the majority of neurobehavioral measures (e.g., post-concussion symptoms, sleep, fatigue). When examining the total number of clinically elevated measures, the High LBE subgroup consistently had a greater number of clinically elevated scores compared with the Low LBE subgroup for the majority of comparisons (i.e., four to 15 or more elevated symptoms). In contrast, in the presence of clinically meaningful PTSD symptoms (i.e., High PTSD), there were no differences between High versus Low LBE subgroups for all measures. When examining the total number of clinically elevated measures, however, there were meaningful differences between High versus Low LBE subgroups for those comparisons that included a high number of clinically elevated scores (i.e., six to 10 or more), but not for a low number of clinically elevated scores (i.e., one to five or more). High LBE, as quantified using a more comprehensive measure than utilized in past research (i.e., BETS), was associated with worse overall neurobehavioral functioning after MTBI. This study extends existing literature showing that lifetime blast exposure, that is largely subconcussive, may negatively impact warfighter brain health and readiness beyond diagnosable brain injury.
本研究的目的是通过(a)使用全面的终生爆炸暴露测量,以及(b)控制创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的影响,扩展先前关于终生爆炸暴露与轻度创伤性脑损伤(MTBI)后神经行为功能的关系的研究。参与者是 103 名美国军人和退伍军人(SMV),他们有经医学诊断的 MTBI,分别从三个军事治疗设施(74.8%)和社区招聘计划(25.2%,例如社交媒体、传单)招募。参与者在受伤后 12 个月或更长时间内完成了一系列神经行为测量(神经行为症状量表、PTSD 检查表 PCLC、TBI 生活质量),包括爆炸暴露阈值调查(BETS)。该样本分为两组终生爆炸暴露(LBE):高( = 57)和低( = 46)LBE。此外,该样本还分为四个 LBE/PTSD 亚组:高 PTSD/高 LBE(n = 38);高 PTSD/低 LBE( = 19);低 PTSD/高 LBE( = 19);和低 PTSD/低 LBE( = 27)。与低 LBE 组相比,高 LBE 组在所有神经行为测量上的得分始终较差。然而,当使用方差分析(ANCOVA)控制 PTSD 的影响时,只有少数组间差异仍然存在。当比较四个 LBE/PTSD 亚组的测量值时,在没有临床显著 PTSD 症状(即低 PTSD)的情况下,高 LBE 组在大多数神经行为测量上的得分较差(例如,脑震荡后症状、睡眠、疲劳)。当检查临床升高的测量总数时,高 LBE 亚组在大多数比较中始终比低 LBE 亚组有更多的临床升高评分(即四个或更多升高的症状)。相比之下,在存在临床显著 PTSD 症状(即高 PTSD)的情况下,高 LBE 亚组在所有测量值上与低 LBE 亚组之间均无差异。然而,当检查临床升高的测量总数时,对于包含大量临床升高评分的那些比较(即六个或更多),高 LBE 亚组与低 LBE 亚组之间存在显著差异,但对于包含少量临床升高评分的那些比较(即一个或五个或更多)则没有差异。高 LBE,如使用比以往研究更全面的测量(即 BETS)量化,与 MTBI 后整体神经行为功能较差有关。本研究扩展了现有文献,表明终生爆炸暴露,主要是亚脑震荡性的,可能会对参战人员的大脑健康和战备状态产生负面影响,超出可诊断的脑损伤。