Suppr超能文献

南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省一所大学利用博士研究成果的影响因素:学术领袖的观点。

Factors influencing the utilization of doctoral research findings at a university in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Views of academic leaders.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Berea, Durban, South Africa.

Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 31;18(8):e0290651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290651. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Translation of health research findings into policy remains a challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. Factors influencing health research utilization are poorly described in literature. Therefore, identifying factors that influence the utilization of research findings for policy formulation is essential to facilitate implementation of evidence-based interventions. The purpose of this study was to explore the views of academic leaders as to why doctoral research is not adequately used in policymaking.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were held with purposively selected key informants from the College of Health Sciences. An open-ended interview guide aimed at exploring college leadership views on factors influencing utilization of PhD generated knowledge into policy was used. Data was analysed thematically using NVivo 12 software. Thematic analysis was used to generate themes around the factors influencing utilization of doctoral research into policy.

RESULTS

Factors such as inaccessibility of research results, lack of funding, poor quality of research, lack of continuity in translating research into policy, lack of timeliness of research results and lack of collaboration between researchers and policymakers hindered the utilization of PhD generated knowledge. Participants recommended engagement with the Department of Health/policymakers, collaboration with Department of Health/policymakers, increasing enrolment of South African citizens into PhD program, making final research products available to Department of Health/policymakers, and provision of funding for dissemination of research results.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that final doctoral research results are mainly disseminated through journal articles and theses. Participants cited inaccessibility of research findings, lack of funding and poor-quality research as the most common factors hindering utilization of doctoral research findings. The study also recommended availing adequate funding for dissemination of research results, collaboration between researchers and policymakers, facilitation of policymaker-researcher engagement to find best ways of using research findings to influence policy and making final research products accessible to policymakers. Further research to gain the perspective of policymakers as to why doctoral research is not adequately used in policy formulation is recommended.

摘要

背景

将健康研究成果转化为政策在撒哈拉以南非洲仍然是一个挑战。影响健康研究利用的因素在文献中描述得很差。因此,确定影响研究结果用于制定政策的因素对于促进基于证据的干预措施的实施至关重要。本研究的目的是探讨学术领袖的观点,即为什么博士研究不能充分用于决策制定。

方法

从健康科学学院有目的地选择了关键信息提供者进行深入访谈。使用开放式访谈指南,旨在探讨学院领导层对影响将博士生成的知识用于政策的因素的看法。使用 NVivo 12 软件进行主题分析。使用主题分析生成主题,主题围绕影响将博士研究用于政策的因素。

结果

研究结果无法获得、缺乏资金、研究质量差、将研究转化为政策的连续性差、研究结果及时性差以及研究人员与政策制定者之间缺乏合作等因素阻碍了博士生成的知识的利用。参与者建议与卫生部/决策者接触、与卫生部/决策者合作、增加南非公民攻读博士学位的人数、向卫生部/决策者提供最终研究成果、并为研究结果的传播提供资金。

结论

该研究表明,最终的博士研究成果主要通过期刊文章和论文传播。参与者指出,研究结果难以获得、缺乏资金和研究质量差是阻碍博士研究成果利用的最常见因素。该研究还建议为传播研究成果提供充足的资金、研究人员与政策制定者之间的合作、促进决策者与研究人员的接触,以找到利用研究成果影响政策的最佳方法,并使最终的研究成果能够为政策制定者所用。建议进一步研究政策制定者的观点,了解为什么博士研究不能充分用于政策制定。

相似文献

3
4
Views of health system policymakers on the role of research in health policymaking in Israel.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Jun 20;5:24. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0088-1. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Translating evidence into policy: opinions and insights of Health Researchers and Policymakers in Nepal.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07102-y.
2
Research Dissemination Strategies Used by Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientists.
East Afr Health Res J. 2019;3(1):70-78. doi: 10.24248/EAHRJ-D-18-00011. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
3
A scoping review of researchers' involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa.
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 27;10(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y.
5
Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 15;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3.
6
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.
9
Integrated Knowledge Translation with Public Health Policy Makers: A Scoping Review.
Healthc Policy. 2019 Feb;14(3):55-77. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25792.
10
Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019 Mar 4;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0199-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验