Department of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan.
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Oct 4;66(10):4025-4036. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00115. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
The ability to understand speech under adverse listening conditions is highly variable across listeners. Despite this, studies have found that listeners with normal hearing display consistency in their ability to perceive speech across different types of degraded speech, suggesting that, for at least these listeners, global skills may be involved in navigating the ambiguity in speech signals. However, there are substantial differences in the perceptual challenges faced by listeners with normal and impaired hearing. This study examines whether listeners with sensorineural hearing loss demonstrate the same type of consistency as normal-hearing listeners when processing neurotypical (i.e., control) speech that has been degraded by external noise and speech that is neurologically degraded such as dysarthria.
Listeners with normal hearing ( = 31) and listeners with sensorineural hearing loss ( = 36) completed an intelligibility task with neurotypical speech in noise and with dysarthric speech in quiet.
Findings were consistent with previous work demonstrating a relationship between the ability to perceive neurotypical speech in noise and dysarthric speech for listeners with normal hearing, albeit at a higher intelligibility level than previously observed. This relationship was also observed for listeners with hearing loss, although listeners with more severe hearing losses performed better with dysarthric speech than with neurotypical speech in noise.
This study demonstrated a high level of consistency in intelligibility performance for listeners across two different types of degraded speech, even when those listeners were further challenged by the presence of sensorineural hearing loss. Clinical implications for both listeners with hearing loss and their communication partners with dysarthria are discussed.
在不利的听力条件下理解言语的能力在不同的听众之间差异很大。尽管如此,研究发现,具有正常听力的听众在感知不同类型的语音退化语音时表现出一致性,这表明,对于至少这些听众来说,全局技能可能涉及到在语音信号的歧义中导航。然而,正常听力和听力受损的听众所面临的感知挑战存在很大差异。本研究考察了感音神经性听力损失的听众在处理正常听力(即对照)语音的神经退化方面是否表现出与正常听力听众相同的一致性,这种语音已经被外部噪声和语音退化(如构音障碍)所退化。
正常听力( = 31)和感音神经性听力损失( = 36)的听众完成了一项神经正常语音在噪声中的可懂度任务和构音障碍语音在安静中的可懂度任务。
研究结果与先前的工作一致,即正常听力的听众能够感知神经正常语音在噪声中的能力与构音障碍语音之间存在关系,尽管其可懂度水平高于先前观察到的水平。对于听力损失的听众也观察到了这种关系,尽管听力损失更严重的听众在构音障碍语音方面的表现优于神经正常语音在噪声中的表现。
即使在感音神经性听力损失的情况下,该研究也证明了听众在两种不同类型的语音退化下的可懂度表现具有高度的一致性。对于听力损失的听众及其构音障碍的交流伙伴,本研究具有临床意义。