Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Centro de Investigación Biológica en Red, Epidemiología y Salud Pública- CIBERESP, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Plasmid. 2023 Sep-Nov;128:102706. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2023.102706. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
Antimicrobial resistance (AR) mechanisms encoded on plasmids can affect other phenotypic traits in bacteria, including biofilm formation. These effects may be important contributors to the spread of AR and the evolutionary success of plasmids, but it is not yet clear how common such effects are for clinical plasmids/bacteria, and how they vary among different plasmids and host strains. Here, we used a combinatorial approach to test the effects of clinical AR plasmids on biofilm formation and population growth in clinical and laboratory Escherichia coli strains. In most of the 25 plasmid-bacterium combinations tested, we observed no significant change in biofilm formation upon plasmid introduction, contrary to the notion that plasmids frequently alter biofilm formation. In a few cases we detected altered biofilm formation, and these effects were specific to particular plasmid-bacterium combinations. By contrast, we found a relatively strong effect of a chromosomal streptomycin-resistance mutation (in rpsL) on biofilm formation. Further supporting weak and host-strain-dependent effects of clinical plasmids on bacterial phenotypes in the combinations we tested, we found growth costs associated with plasmid carriage (measured in the absence of antibiotics) were moderate and varied among bacterial strains. These findings suggest some key clinical resistance plasmids cause only mild phenotypic disruption to their host bacteria, which may contribute to the persistence of plasmids in the absence of antibiotics.
抗生素耐药性 (AR) 机制编码在质粒上,可影响细菌中的其他表型特征,包括生物膜形成。这些影响可能是 AR 传播和质粒进化成功的重要因素,但目前尚不清楚这些影响在临床质粒/细菌中有多常见,以及它们在不同质粒和宿主菌株之间有何差异。在这里,我们使用组合方法来测试临床 AR 质粒对临床和实验室大肠杆菌菌株生物膜形成和群体生长的影响。在我们测试的 25 个质粒-细菌组合中的大多数中,我们观察到引入质粒后生物膜形成没有明显变化,这与质粒经常改变生物膜形成的观点相反。在少数情况下,我们检测到生物膜形成的改变,这些影响是特定于特定的质粒-细菌组合的。相比之下,我们发现染色体链霉素抗性突变 (rpsL 中) 对生物膜形成有相对较强的影响。进一步支持我们测试的组合中临床质粒对细菌表型的弱且依赖宿主菌株的影响,我们发现与质粒携带相关的生长成本(在没有抗生素的情况下测量)适中且在不同的细菌菌株之间存在差异。这些发现表明,一些关键的临床耐药质粒仅对其宿主细菌造成轻微的表型破坏,这可能有助于在没有抗生素的情况下质粒的持续存在。