• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在印度北部开发相关的社区心理健康项目:与有经验的专家共同生成知识时我们会提出的五个问题。

Developing relevant community mental health programmes in North India: five questions we ask when co-producing knowledge with experts by experience.

机构信息

Community Health and Development Program, Herbertpur Christian Hospital, Herbertpur, India.

Community Health and Development Program, Herbertpur Christian Hospital, Herbertpur, India

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Aug;8(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011671.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011671
PMID:37652565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10476121/
Abstract

Knowledge co-production can improve the quality and accessibility of health, and also benefit service users, allowing them to be recognised as skilled and capable. Yet despite these clear benefits, there are inherent challenges in the power relations of co-production, particularly when experts by experience (EBE) are structurally disadvantaged in communication skills or literacy. The processes of how knowledge is co-produced and negotiated are seldom described. This paper aims to describe processes of co-production building on the experiences of EBE (people with lived experience of psychosocial or physical disability), practitioners and researchers working together with a non-profit community mental health programme in North India. We describe processes of group formation, relationship building, reflexive discussion and negotiation over a 7-year period with six diverse EBE groups. Through a process of discussion and review, we propose these five questions which may optimise co-production processes in communities: (1) Who is included in co-production? (2) How can we optimise participation by people with diverse sociodemographic identities? (3) How do we build relationships of trust within EBE groups? (4) How can we combine psychosocial support and knowledge co-production agendas in groups? and (5) How is the expertise of experts by experience acknowledged?

摘要

知识共创可以提高健康的质量和可及性,也有利于服务使用者,使他们被认可为有技能和能力的人。然而,尽管有这些明显的好处,但在共创过程中的权力关系中存在固有的挑战,特别是当有经验的专家(EBE)在沟通技巧或读写能力方面处于结构性劣势时。知识共创和协商的过程很少被描述。本文旨在描述知识共创的过程,这些过程是基于在印度北部的一个非营利性社区心理健康项目中,EBE(有心理或身体残疾经历的人)、从业者和研究人员共同工作的经验。我们描述了在 7 年的时间里,六个不同的 EBE 群体的小组形成、关系建立、反思性讨论和协商的过程。通过讨论和审查的过程,我们提出了这五个问题,这些问题可能会优化社区中的共创过程:(1)谁参与共创?(2)如何优化具有不同社会人口身份的人的参与?(3)如何在 EBE 群体内部建立信任关系?(4)如何在小组中结合心理社会支持和知识共创议程?以及(5)如何承认有经验的专家的专业知识?

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa2/10476121/c77d84cefdc3/bmjgh-2022-011671f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa2/10476121/c77d84cefdc3/bmjgh-2022-011671f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa2/10476121/c77d84cefdc3/bmjgh-2022-011671f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing relevant community mental health programmes in North India: five questions we ask when co-producing knowledge with experts by experience.在印度北部开发相关的社区心理健康项目:与有经验的专家共同生成知识时我们会提出的五个问题。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Aug;8(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011671.
2
Expert by experience involvement in mental health nursing education: The co-production of standards between Experts by Experience and academics in mental health nursing.有经验的专家参与心理健康护理教育:在心理健康护理方面,有经验的专家和学者共同制定标准。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;27(5):553-562. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12605. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
Embedding lived experience expertise across the mental health tertiary education sector: An integrative review in the context of Aotearoa New Zealand.将精神卫生高等教育领域的生活体验专业知识嵌入:在新西兰奥特亚罗瓦背景下的综合述评。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Dec;28(6):1140-1152. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12756. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
4
Co-production of a pictorial recovery tool for people with psycho-social disability informed by a participatory action research approach-a qualitative study set in India.参与式行动研究方法指导下为心理社会残疾人士制作图像康复工具的共同制作——印度的一项定性研究。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):486-499. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz043.
5
iSelf-Help: a co-designed, culturally appropriate, online pain management programme in Aotearoa.“自我帮助”:一项在新西兰共同设计的、符合文化背景的在线疼痛管理计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 21;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00339-9.
6
'Building bridges': reflections and recommendations for co-producing health research.“搭建桥梁”:关于共同开展健康研究的思考与建议
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 6;9(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00528-0.
7
Actualizing community-academic partnerships in research: a case study on rural perinatal peer support.在研究中实现社区与学术机构的合作:一项关于农村围产期同伴支持的案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 18;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00407-0.
8
Strengthening community mental health competence-A realist informed case study from Dehradun, North India.加强社区心理健康能力——来自印度北部德拉敦的一项基于现实主义的案例研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jan;26(1):e179-e190. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12498. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
Creating or taking opportunity: Strategies for implementing expert by experience positions in mental health academia.创建或抓住机会:在精神卫生学术界实施经验专家职位的策略。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Aug;29(4):592-602. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12839. Epub 2022 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing unmet mental health needs of older adults in Turbo, Colombia: a multi-component psychosocial intervention feasibility study.满足哥伦比亚图尔博老年人未得到满足的心理健康需求:一项多成分社会心理干预可行性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 20;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02381-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving mental ill-health with psycho-social group interventions in South Asia-A scoping review using a realist lens.通过社会心理小组干预改善南亚地区的心理健康问题——一项基于现实主义视角的范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 28;3(8):e0001736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001736. eCollection 2023.
2
Working in the wake: transformative global health in an imperfect world.在困境中前行:不完美世界中的变革性全球健康。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Sep;7(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010520.
3
Co-design for indigenous and other children and young people from priority social groups: A systematic review.
为原住民及其他优先社会群体中的儿童和年轻人开展共同设计:一项系统综述。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Mar 28;18:101077. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101077. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Mapping definitions of co-production and co-design in health and social care: A systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future.绘制健康和社会关怀领域中共同生产和共同设计的定义:为未来提供经验教训的系统范围界定综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):902-913. doi: 10.1111/hex.13470. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Direct participation of people with communication disabilities in research on poverty and disabilities in low and middle income countries: A critical review.直接参与中低收入国家贫困与残疾问题研究的残疾人群体:批判性回顾。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 14;16(10):e0258575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258575. eCollection 2021.
6
The absurdity of research registration for community-oriented knowledge coproduction.以社区为导向的知识共同生产的研究注册的荒谬性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Aug;6(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007040.
7
Power, Privilege and Knowledge: the Untenable Promise of Co-production in Mental "Health".权力、特权与知识:精神“健康”领域共同生产难以维系的承诺
Front Sociol. 2019 Jul 16;4:57. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00057. eCollection 2019.
8
Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research.有效吸引和参与社区利益攸关方共同开展全球卫生研究。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n178.
9
Exploring Community Mental Health Systems - A Participatory Health Needs and Assets Assessment in the Yamuna Valley, North India.探索社区心理健康系统——印度北部亚穆纳河谷的参与式健康需求和资产评估。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jan 1;11(1):90-99. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.222.
10
Bridging Western and Indigenous knowledge through intercultural dialogue: lessons from participatory research in Mexico.通过跨文化对话连接西方和本土知识:来自墨西哥参与式研究的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002488.