Department of Mathematics and Statistics and Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom (M.J.T.); GSK Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, United Kingdom (L.C.-S., J.W.T.Y.); and Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom (H.M.)
Department of Mathematics and Statistics and Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom (M.J.T.); GSK Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, United Kingdom (L.C.-S., J.W.T.Y.); and Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom (H.M.).
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2023 Oct;387(1):92-99. doi: 10.1124/jpet.122.001551. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
As pharmaceutical development moves from early-stage in vitro experimentation to later in vivo and subsequent clinical trials, data and knowledge are acquired across multiple time and length scales, from the subcellular to whole patient cohort scale. Realizing the potential of this data for informing decision making in pharmaceutical development requires the individual and combined application of machine learning (ML) and mechanistic multiscale mathematical modeling approaches. Here we outline how these two approaches, both individually and in tandem, can be applied at different stages of the drug discovery and development pipeline to inform decision making compound development. The importance of discerning between knowledge and data are highlighted in informing the initial use of ML or mechanistic quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models. We discuss the application of sensitivity and structural identifiability analyses of QSP models in informing future experimental studies to which ML may be applied, as well as how ML approaches can be used to inform mechanistic model development. Relevant literature studies are highlighted and we close by discussing caveats regarding the application of each approach in an age of constant data acquisition. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We consider when best to apply machine learning (ML) and mechanistic quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) approaches in the context of the drug discovery and development pipeline. We discuss the importance of prior knowledge and data available for the system of interest and how this informs the individual and combined application of ML and QSP approaches at each stage of the pipeline.
随着药物研发从早期的体外实验向后期的体内实验和随后的临床试验推进,数据和知识在多个时间和长度尺度上积累,从亚细胞到整个患者队列尺度。要实现这些数据在药物研发决策中的潜力,需要将机器学习(ML)和基于机制的多尺度数学建模方法单独和联合应用。在这里,我们概述了这两种方法如何在药物发现和开发管道的不同阶段单独和联合应用,以告知化合物开发的决策。在告知最初使用 ML 或基于机制的定量系统药理学(QSP)模型时,区分知识和数据的重要性被强调。我们讨论了 QSP 模型的敏感性和结构可识别性分析在告知可能应用 ML 的未来实验研究中的应用,以及如何应用 ML 方法来告知基于机制的模型开发。突出了相关的文献研究,最后我们讨论了在数据不断获取的时代应用每种方法的注意事项。
我们考虑在药物发现和开发管道的背景下何时最好应用机器学习(ML)和基于机制的定量系统药理学(QSP)方法。我们讨论了对于感兴趣的系统而言,先验知识和可用数据的重要性,以及这如何告知在管道的每个阶段单独和联合应用 ML 和 QSP 方法。