• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸痛患者HEART路径的调整:韩国视角

Modification of HEART Pathway for Patients With Chest Pain: A Korean Perspective.

作者信息

Chae Bora, Ahn Shin, Kim Youn-Jung, Ryoo Seung Mok, Sohn Chang Hwan, Seo Dong-Woo, Kim Won Young

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean Circ J. 2023 Sep;53(9):635-644. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0354.

DOI:10.4070/kcj.2022.0354
PMID:37653699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10475686/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART) pathway was developed to identify patients at low risk of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department.

METHODS

We modified the HEART pathway by replacing the Korean cut-off of 25 kg/m² with the conventional threshold of 30 kg/m² in the definition of obesity among risk factors. The primary outcome was a MACE within 30 days, which included acute myocardial infarction, primary coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, and all-cause death.

RESULTS

Of the 1,304 patients prospectively enrolled, MACE occurred in 320 (24.5%). The modified HEART pathway identified 37.3% of patients as low-risk compared with 38.3% using the HEART pathway. Of the 500 patients classified as low-risk with HEART pathway, 8 (1.6%) experienced MACE, and of the 486 low-risk patients with modified HEART pathway, 4 (0.8%) experienced MACE. The modified HEART pathway had a sensitivity of 98.8%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2%, a specificity of 49.0%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38.6%, compared with the original HEART pathway, with a sensitivity of 97.5%, a NPV of 98.4%, a specificity of 50.0%, and a PPV of 38.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

When applied to Korean population, modified HEART pathway could identify patients safe for early discharge more accurately by using body mass index cut-off levels suggested for Koreans.

摘要

背景与目的

开发了病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白(HEART)路径,以在因胸痛到急诊科就诊的患者中识别发生重大不良心脏事件(MACE)风险较低的患者。

方法

我们对HEART路径进行了修改,在危险因素中肥胖的定义里,将韩国的25kg/m²临界值替换为传统的30kg/m²临界值。主要结局是30天内发生的MACE,包括急性心肌梗死、初次冠状动脉介入治疗、冠状动脉旁路移植术和全因死亡。

结果

在1304例前瞻性纳入的患者中,320例(24.5%)发生了MACE。改良后的HEART路径将37.3%的患者识别为低风险,而使用HEART路径时这一比例为38.3%。在被HEART路径分类为低风险的500例患者中,8例(1.6%)发生了MACE,在改良HEART路径的486例低风险患者中,4例(0.8%)发生了MACE。与原始HEART路径相比,改良后的HEART路径敏感性为98.8%,阴性预测值(NPV)为99.2%,特异性为49.0%,阳性预测值(PPV)为38.6%,而原始HEART路径敏感性为97.5%,NPV为98.4%,特异性为50.0%,PPV为38.8%。

结论

应用于韩国人群时,改良后的HEART路径通过使用针对韩国人建议的体重指数临界值水平,可以更准确地识别适合早期出院的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5850/10475686/d3c4e55473ea/kcj-53-635-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5850/10475686/e6778dcc79f7/kcj-53-635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5850/10475686/d3c4e55473ea/kcj-53-635-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5850/10475686/e6778dcc79f7/kcj-53-635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5850/10475686/d3c4e55473ea/kcj-53-635-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Modification of HEART Pathway for Patients With Chest Pain: A Korean Perspective.胸痛患者HEART路径的调整:韩国视角
Korean Circ J. 2023 Sep;53(9):635-644. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0354.
2
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
3
Comparison of the T-MACS score with the TIMI score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.比较 T-MACS 评分与 TIMI 评分在以胸痛为主诉就诊于急诊科的患者中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;60:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
4
A direct comparison of decision rules for early discharge of suspected acute coronary syndromes in the era of high sensitivity troponin.高敏肌钙蛋白时代疑似急性冠脉综合征早期出院决策规则的直接比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Aug;8(5):421-431. doi: 10.1177/2048872618755369. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Performance of cardiac troponins within the HEART score in predicting major adverse cardiac events at the emergency department.心脏肌钙蛋白在 HEART 评分中对急诊科主要不良心脏事件的预测性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;38(8):1560-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158420. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
6
Performance analysis considering endpoints for three accelerated diagnostic protocols for chest pain.考虑终点的三种胸痛加速诊断方案的性能分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;64:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
7
Risk stratifying chest pain patients in the emergency department using HEART, GRACE and TIMI scores, with a single contemporary troponin result, to predict major adverse cardiac events.使用 HEART、GRACE 和 TIMI 评分以及单次当代肌钙蛋白结果对急诊科胸痛患者进行风险分层,以预测主要不良心脏事件。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jul;35(7):420-427. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207172. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
8
Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.前瞻性验证改良的心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分在急诊科胸痛且可能为急性冠脉综合征患者中的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x.
9
Chest Pain Risk Stratification: A Comparison of the 2-Hour Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (ADAPT) and the HEART Pathway.胸痛风险分层:2小时加速诊断方案(ADAPT)与HEART路径的比较
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Jun;15(2):46-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000072.
10
Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome.高敏肌钙蛋白 I 在 2 小时诊断策略中的验证,以评估急诊科疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者 30 天结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 1;62(14):1242-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.078. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Adapting the HEART Pathway for Korean Patients: The Potential Impact on Chest Pain Management at Emergency Department.为韩国患者调整HEART路径:对急诊科胸痛管理的潜在影响。
Korean Circ J. 2023 Sep;53(9):645-647. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0165.

本文引用的文献

1
Finding acute coronary syndrome with serial troponin testing for rapid assessment of cardiac ischemic symptoms (FAST-TRAC): a study protocol.通过连续肌钙蛋白检测发现急性冠状动脉综合征以快速评估心脏缺血症状(FAST-TRAC):一项研究方案
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;9(2):140-145. doi: 10.15441/ceem.21.154. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR 胸痛评估与诊断指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2021 Nov 30;144(22):e368-e454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
3
Comparison of accelerated diagnostic pathways for acute chest pain risk stratification.急性胸痛风险分层的加速诊断途径比较。
Heart. 2020 Jul;106(13):977-984. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316426. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
4
2018 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity Guideline for the Management of Obesity in Korea.2018年韩国肥胖研究学会韩国肥胖管理指南
J Obes Metab Syndr. 2019 Mar;28(1):40-45. doi: 10.7570/jomes.2019.28.1.40. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
5
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):e618-e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617.
6
Safely Identifying Emergency Department Patients With Acute Chest Pain for Early Discharge.安全识别急诊科急性胸痛患者以实现早期出院。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 27;138(22):2456-2468. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036528.
7
Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.临床政策:急诊科疑似非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者评估和管理中的关键问题。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;72(5):e65-e106. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.07.045.
8
Adiposity and risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in 0·5 million Chinese men and women: a prospective cohort study.在中国 500 万男性和女性中,肥胖与缺血性和出血性卒中风险的前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jun;6(6):e630-e640. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30216-X.
9
An external validation of the HEART pathway among Emergency Department patients with chest pain.胸痛急诊科患者 HEART 路径的外部验证。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;13(8):1249-1255. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1809-y. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Obesity and CardiovascularDiseases.肥胖与心血管疾病
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2017 Nov;42(11):376-394. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 13.