Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr., Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78216, USA.
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;13(8):1249-1255. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1809-y. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
The impact of an outpatient disposition strategy for patients with HEART score 0-3 (HEART pathway) on HEART score prognostic accuracy is unclear. Our objective is to perform an external validation the HEART score in the setting of recent implementation of the HEART pathway. We conducted an external validation study of the HEART pathway among patients presenting to our ED with chest pain 6 weeks after institutional implementation of a HEART pathway outpatient disposition pathway. We reviewed the charts of 625 consecutive patients with chest pain. Data abstracted included all elements of the HEART score to include history, electrocardiogram (ECG) read, patient age, patient risk factors, and troponin levels. We also reviewed each patient's record for evidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) to include mortality, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization over 6 weeks following their initial ED visit. We double-abstracted 10% of the charts for quality assurance purposes. Of 625 charts, 449 patients met all criteria for study inclusion. Of these, 25 subjects (5.56%) experience 6-week MACE. No subject with a score of 3 or less has a MACE at 6 weeks (100% sensitivity, 38.7% specificity). The area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) is 0.898 (95% confidence interval 0.847-0.950). Kappa coefficients for inter-rater reliability range from 0.62 for the history component of the HEART score to 1.0 for troponin. A low HEART score (0-3) maintains excellent sensitivity for predicting 6-week MACE in the setting of an outpatient disposition pathway for these patients.
对于 HEART 评分 0-3 分(HEART 路径)的患者采用门诊处置策略对 HEART 评分预后准确性的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是在最近实施 HEART 路径的情况下对 HEART 评分进行外部验证。我们在机构实施 HEART 路径门诊处置途径后 6 周内对 ED 就诊胸痛的患者进行了 HEART 路径的外部验证研究。我们回顾了 625 例连续胸痛患者的病历。提取的数据包括 HEART 评分的所有要素,包括病史、心电图(ECG)阅读、患者年龄、患者危险因素和肌钙蛋白水平。我们还查阅了每位患者的记录,以了解主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的证据,包括死亡率、心肌梗死或初始 ED 就诊后 6 周内的冠状动脉血运重建。我们为质量保证目的对 10%的图表进行了双摘要。在 625 份图表中,449 份符合研究纳入标准。在这些患者中,有 25 例(5.56%)在 6 周时发生 MACE。评分在 3 分或以下的患者无一例在 6 周时发生 MACE(100%的敏感性,38.7%的特异性)。接收者操作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积为 0.898(95%置信区间为 0.847-0.950)。HEART 评分的历史组成部分的组内相关系数范围为 0.62,而肌钙蛋白的组内相关系数为 1.0。低 HEART 评分(0-3)在这些患者的门诊处置途径中对预测 6 周 MACE 具有出色的敏感性。