Alqarni Adel S, AlGomaiah Muadh A
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Paediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S455-S458. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_605_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
The aim of the current research was to appraise the effectiveness of different radicular canal irrigant solutions on the elimination of the smear layer in deciduous teeth.
A total of 60 fit deciduous teeth that were subjected to extraction for a variety of curative reasons were employed in this research. Every sample tooth was subjected to decoronation at the CEJ employing a carborundum disk. A number 10 K-file (Dentsply Maillefer) was utilized to estimate the working length of the radicular canal using a manual technique by a sole operator in the step-back method. The specimens were allocated at random to one of the following three groups: Group 1: Irrigation using Saline, Group 2: Irrigation using 6% Citric acid, and Group 3: Irrigation using sodium hypochlorite. Following 24 h of storage, the sample teeth were subjected to vertical grooving using diamond suctioning discs beneath a high-power suction. All sections were subjected to staining using 1% methylene blue for 2 min before rinsing with 0.9% saline and allowed to bench dry. Rendering scores for the existence of a smear layer for the two halves of the split sample tooth were performed by visual inspection for the cervical, middle, plus apical one-third via a light stereomicroscope at 40× magnifying power.
With saline irrigation, the smear coat elimination at coronal one-third scored at 2.16 ± 0.11, 1.84 ± 0.06 at middle one-third, along with 1.92 ± 0.26 at the apical one-third. When 6% citric acid was employed as an irrigant, the scores were 0.72 ± 0.14 at coronal one-third, 0.84 ± 0.03 at middle one-third, and 0.90 ± 0.23 at apical one-third. When sodium hypochlorite was used as an irrigant, the mean score was 0.78 ± 0.12 at the coronal one-third, 0.92 ± 0.06 at the middle one-third, as well as 0.96 ± 0.18 at the apical one-third. The differences between the groups were statistically significant.
The current research arrived at a conclusion that 6% citric acid has the potential to eliminate smear coats in deciduous radicular canals when employed as a closing irrigant following instrumentation.
本研究的目的是评估不同的根管冲洗液对乳牙根管内玷污层清除效果。
本研究共纳入60颗因各种治疗原因需要拔除的健康乳牙。每颗样本牙均使用碳化硅盘在牙颈部釉牙骨质界处进行去冠处理。使用10号K锉(登士柏迈弗),由一名操作人员采用逐步后退法,通过手工操作来测量根管工作长度。将样本随机分为以下三组:第1组:用生理盐水冲洗;第2组:用6%柠檬酸冲洗;第3组:用次氯酸钠冲洗。储存24小时后,在高功率抽吸下,使用金刚石切割盘对样本牙进行垂直开槽。所有切片在用0.9%生理盐水冲洗前,先用1%亚甲蓝染色2分钟,然后在实验台上晾干。通过40倍放大率的光学体视显微镜,目视检查劈开样本牙两半的颈部、中部和根尖三分之一处玷污层的存在情况并进行评分。
用生理盐水冲洗时,冠方三分之一处玷污层清除评分2.16±0.11,中部三分之一处为1.84±0.06,根尖三分之一处为1.92±0.26。当使用6%柠檬酸作为冲洗液时,冠方三分之一处评分0.72±0.14,中部三分之一处为0.84±0.03,根尖三分之一处为0.90±0.23。当使用次氯酸钠作为冲洗液时,冠方三分之一处平均评分为0.78±0.12,中部三分之一处为0.92±0.06,根尖三分之一处为0.96±0.18。各组之间差异具有统计学意义。
本研究得出结论,6%柠檬酸作为根管预备后的封闭冲洗液时,有潜力清除乳牙根管内的玷污层。