Suppr超能文献

使用四种不同冲洗液并结合超声震荡对根尖三分之一处玷污层去除效果的比较评估:一项体外扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析

Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal in Apical Third Using Four Different Irrigants With Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis.

作者信息

Murugesan Kalaiarasi, Vishwanath Sankar, Kadandale Sadasiva, Thanikachalam Yashini, Parthasarathy Revathy, Ilango Sangita

机构信息

Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Mar 14;14(3):e23142. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23142. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Aim This study aims to compare and evaluate the efficacy of four different irrigating solutions like sodium hypochlorite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA), Oxum, and ozonated water with ultrasonic agitation in removing the smear layer in the apical third of root canals using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Materials and methods For the study, 50 freshly extracted human mandibular premolars with single well-developed roots without any curvatures were taken. The teeth taken were decoronated to obtain a uniform working length of 15 mm, and the samples were instrumented using a ProTaper Gold rotary file system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) up to F2 size, along with irrigation of 1 ml of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in between instrumentation. The samples were randomly divided into five groups with 10 samples each, according to the final irrigant used. Group I-EDTA 17%, Group II-NaOCl 5%, Group III-Oxum, Group IV-ozonated water, and Group V-normal saline. In all groups, ultrasonic agitation of the irrigating solution was performed using a size 20 file, held passively inside the root canal. Then the samples were flushed with distilled water, dried with paper points, split into two halves, and subjected to SEM analysis. SEM images of the apical third region of root samples were taken at 5000X resolution and scored on a scale of 1 to 4. Results Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test using software version SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago). The results showed that the 17% EDTA group showed the least smear layer scores when compared to other groups with statistical significance. This was followed by the Oxum group and 5% NaOCl group, whereas the ozone water group and saline control group showed the highest smear layer scores. Conclusion The present study reveals that the EDTA is the superior irrigant in the elimination of smear layer in root canal treatment. Newer irrigants, such as Oxum, can be used as an alternative to EDTA for smear layer removal while remaining biocompatible with dentin. Whereas ozone can be combined with other irrigants for synergistic action of enhanced antimicrobial property and smear layer elimination in the future.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)比较和评估四种不同冲洗液(次氯酸钠、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、Oxum和臭氧水)在超声振荡辅助下清除根管根尖三分之一处玷污层的效果。

材料与方法 本研究选取50颗新鲜拔除的人下颌前磨牙,牙根单一根且无弯曲。将所取牙齿去除冠部,以获得15mm的统一工作长度,样本使用ProTaper Gold旋转锉系统(登士柏迈福,瑞士巴拉格)预备至F2规格,预备过程中每隔一段时间冲洗1ml 3%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)。根据最终使用的冲洗液,将样本随机分为五组,每组10个样本。第一组为17% EDTA,第二组为5% NaOCl,第三组为Oxum,第四组为臭氧水,第五组为生理盐水。所有组均使用20号锉被动置于根管内对冲洗液进行超声振荡。然后用蒸馏水冲洗样本,用纸尖吸干,将样本劈成两半,进行SEM分析。在5000倍分辨率下拍摄牙根样本根尖三分之一区域的SEM图像,并按1至4分进行评分。

结果 使用软件版本SPSS 17.0(SPSS公司,芝加哥)进行单因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey事后检验。结果显示,与其他组相比,17% EDTA组的玷污层评分最低,具有统计学意义。其次是Oxum组和5% NaOCl组,而臭氧水组和生理盐水对照组的玷污层评分最高。

结论 本研究表明,在根管治疗中,EDTA是清除玷污层的最佳冲洗液。新型冲洗液如Oxum,可作为EDTA的替代品用于去除玷污层,同时与牙本质保持生物相容性。而臭氧未来可与其他冲洗液联合使用以增强抗菌性能和清除玷污层的协同作用。

相似文献

3
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.
7
Smear Layer Removal Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite.
J Endod. 2020 Nov;46(11):1738-1744. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
8
To Evaluate the Efficacy of an Innovative Irrigant on Smear Layer Removal - SEM Analysis.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):ZC104-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17200.7685. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

2
To Evaluate the Efficacy of an Innovative Irrigant on Smear Layer Removal - SEM Analysis.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):ZC104-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17200.7685. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
Synergistic antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine and ozone in endodontic treatment.
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:592423. doi: 10.1155/2014/592423. Epub 2014 May 28.
5
Review of ultrasonic irrigation in endodontics: increasing action of irrigating solutions.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 May 1;17(3):e512-6. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17621.
7
The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation.
Physiol Meas. 2010 Dec;31(12):R49-84. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/12/R01. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
8
Irrigation in endodontics.
Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;54(2):291-312. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.12.001.
9
Influence of final rinse technique on ability of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid of removing smear layer.
J Endod. 2010 Mar;36(3):512-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.004. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
10
The smear layer in endodontics - a review.
Int Endod J. 2010 Jan;43(1):2-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01627.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验