Suppr超能文献

临床评分者的性别与脊椎按摩疗法学生实习生的性别在脊柱手法评估等级上的相互作用。

Interactions between the sex of the clinician grader and the sex of the chiropractic student intern on spinal manipulation assessment grade.

作者信息

Sheppard Michael, Johnson Stephanie, Quiroz Victor, Ward John

出版信息

J Chiropr Educ. 2023 Oct 1;37(2):157-161. doi: 10.7899/JCE-22-12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this project was to determine if there was any relationship between the sex of the clinician grader and the sex of the chiropractic student intern on student spinal manipulation assessment grades.

METHODS

Twelve thousand six hundred and thirty-one supervised patient adjustments by student interns were analyzed over a 3-year data collection window. Student interns were assessed by multiple male and female clinicians in a teaching clinic using a modified Dreyfus model scoring system on a 1-4 scale (1 = novice, 4 = proficient). A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the relationship between grader sex and student grade as well as student sex and student grade.

RESULTS

Sex of the grader had a statistically significant effect on spinal manipulation assessment grade, p < .001, with male clinician graders assigning average scores of 2.81 ± 0.39 (mean ± SD) and female clinician graders scores of 3.01 ± 0.52, r = .18. Sex of the student had a statistically significant but negligible (r = .08) effect on spinal manipulation assessment grade, p < .001, with male students averaging slightly higher scores (2.93 ± 0.47) than females (2.86 ± 0.44) on the modified Dreyfus scale.

CONCLUSION

Male clinicians tended to assign lower grades on spinal manipulation assessments than female clinicians. Male students on average received slightly higher scores than female students on spinal manipulation assessments.

摘要

目的

本项目旨在确定临床评分者的性别与整脊专业实习学生的性别之间是否对学生脊柱手法评估成绩存在任何关联。

方法

在一个为期3年的数据收集期内,对实习学生进行的12631次有监督的患者调整进行了分析。在教学诊所中,多名男性和女性临床医生使用改良的德雷福斯模型评分系统(1 - 4级,1 = 新手,4 = 熟练)对实习学生进行评估。采用曼-惠特尼U检验来比较评分者性别与学生成绩以及学生性别与学生成绩之间的关系。

结果

评分者性别对脊柱手法评估成绩有统计学显著影响,p <.001,男性临床评分者给出的平均分数为2.81 ± 0.39(均值 ± 标准差),女性临床评分者的分数为3.01 ± 0.52,r =.18。学生性别对脊柱手法评估成绩有统计学显著但可忽略不计的影响(r =.08),p <.001,在改良的德雷福斯量表上,男学生的平均分数(2.93 ± 0.47)略高于女学生(2.86 ± 0.44)。

结论

男性临床医生在脊柱手法评估中倾向于给出比女性临床医生更低的分数。在脊柱手法评估中,男学生平均得分略高于女学生。

相似文献

2
Differences in history-taking skills between male and female chiropractic student interns.
J Chiropr Educ. 2023 Oct 1;37(2):151-156. doi: 10.7899/JCE-22-11.
3
Learning Spinal Manipulation: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Performance.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Mar-Apr;43(3):189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.12.010.
4
Learning spinal manipulation: the importance of augmented feedback relating to various kinetic parameters.
Spine J. 2006 Mar-Apr;6(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.001. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
5
Developing skilled performance of lumbar spine manipulation.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Jul-Aug;25(6):353-61. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.126132.
6
Quantitative feedback versus standard training for cervical and thoracic manipulation.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Mar-Apr;26(3):131-8. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(02)54105-1.
7
Measurement and Analysis of Biomechanical Outcomes of Chiropractic Adjustment Performance in Chiropractic Education and Practice.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Mar-Apr;43(3):212-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.05.006. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Chiropractic conservatism among chiropractic students in Denmark: prevalence and consequences.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Dec 4;28(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00352-3.
9
Learning spinal manipulation: the effect of expertise on transfer capability.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 May;38(4):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
10
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Pass/fail decisions and standards: the impact of differential examiner stringency on OSCE outcomes.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 May;27(2):457-473. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10096-9. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
Association of Gender With Learner Assessment in Graduate Medical Education.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010888. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10888.
3
Is There Variability in Scoring of Student Surgical OSCE Performance Based on Examiner Experience and Expertise?
J Surg Educ. 2020 Sep-Oct;77(5):1202-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
4
Gender Bias in Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical Education: Review of the Literature.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(5):712-719. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04884-0.
5
6
The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Dec 27;14:34. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.34. eCollection 2017.
7
Differences in words used to describe racial and gender groups in Medical Student Performance Evaluations.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0181659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181659. eCollection 2017.
8
Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1174-204. doi: 10.1037/a0036620. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
10
All the stereotypes confirmed: differences in how Australian boys and girls use their time.
Health Educ Behav. 2012 Oct;39(5):589-95. doi: 10.1177/1090198111423942. Epub 2011 Dec 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验