• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk: rationale and design of the randomised DEDICATE Trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与低至中度外科手术风险患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术比较:随机DEDICATE 试验的原理和设计。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Oct 23;19(8):652-658. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00232.
2
Transcatheter or Surgical Treatment of Aortic-Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣狭窄的外科治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2024 May 2;390(17):1572-1583. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400685. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.退伍军人事务医疗系统中接受经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的中度风险患者的结局:单中心20年经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):390-398. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27478. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low and intermediate risk: A risk specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与低、中度风险患者外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机对照试验的风险特异性荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0221922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221922. eCollection 2019.
5
Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者随机接受经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的两年结果:全人群北欧主动脉瓣干预随机临床试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003665.
6
Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation: 10-year outcomes of the NOTION trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科主动脉瓣置换术:NOTION 试验的 10 年结果。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Apr 1;45(13):1116-1124. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae043.
7
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020.
8
Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新临床适应证:意大利心脏病学会和 GISE 的专家意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 May;19(5):197-210. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000636.
9
Chronological comparison of TAVI and SAVR stratified to surgical risk: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.按手术风险分层的 TAVI 与 SAVR 的时间序列比较:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Acta Cardiol. 2023 Sep;78(7):778-789. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2023.2218025. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e054222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054222.

引用本文的文献

1
The Next Chapter in TAVR: Innovations and the Road Ahead.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的新篇章:创新与未来之路。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):4504. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134504.
2
Thrombin generation and clot lysis time to predict outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.凝血酶生成和凝血溶解时间用于预测经导管主动脉瓣植入患者的预后。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Apr;58(4):503-513. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03090-6. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
3
[Catheter-based and surgical treatment for aortic valve diseases].[基于导管和手术的主动脉瓣疾病治疗]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 May;65(5):431-438. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01699-y. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

经导管主动脉瓣植入术与低至中度外科手术风险患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术比较:随机DEDICATE 试验的原理和设计。

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk: rationale and design of the randomised DEDICATE Trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Centre for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2023 Oct 23;19(8):652-658. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00232.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00232
PMID:37655862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10587839/
Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the preferred treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and for older patients irrespective of risk. However, in younger, low-risk patients for whom both therapeutic options, TAVI and SAVR, are applicable, the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial, as data on long-term outcomes remain limited. The DEDICATE-DZHK6 Trial is an investigator-initiated, industry-independent, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of TAVI compared to SAVR in low- to intermediate-risk patients aged 65 years or older. To evaluate both treatment strategies, approximately 1,404 patients determined eligible for both TAVI and SAVR by the interdisciplinary Heart Team were randomised to TAVI or SAVR. Broad inclusion and strict exclusion criteria targeted an all-comers patient population. Procedures were performed according to local best practice with contemporary routine medical devices. The primary endpoints are a composite of mortality or stroke at 1 year and 5 years in order to incorporate midterm efficacy results and complement early safety data. Primary outcomes will be tested sequentially for non-inferiority and superiority. The DEDICATE-DZHK6 Trial has been designed to mirror clinical reality for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis and provide unique information on overall outcomes after TAVI and SAVR that can be directly applied to clinical routines. Its results will help further define optimal treatment strategies for low- to intermediate-risk patients in whom both TAVI and SAVR are currently advisable.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为高危外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和老年患者严重主动脉瓣狭窄的首选治疗方法。然而,对于那些有两种治疗选择(TAVI 和 SAVR)且均适用的年轻、低危患者,最佳治疗策略仍存在争议,因为长期结果的数据仍然有限。DEDICATE-DZHK6 试验是一项由研究者发起、行业独立、前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验,旨在比较 TAVI 与 SAVR 在年龄 65 岁及以上低至中危患者中的疗效和安全性。为了评估这两种治疗策略,大约 1404 名通过跨学科心脏团队确定有资格接受 TAVI 和 SAVR 的患者被随机分配到 TAVI 或 SAVR 组。广泛的纳入标准和严格的排除标准针对的是所有符合条件的患者。手术是根据当地最佳实践和当代常规医疗设备进行的。主要终点是 1 年和 5 年时的死亡率或卒中的复合终点,以便纳入中期疗效结果并补充早期安全性数据。主要结局将依次进行非劣效性和优效性检验。DEDICATE-DZHK6 试验旨在模拟严重主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗临床实际情况,并提供关于 TAVI 和 SAVR 后总体结果的独特信息,这些信息可以直接应用于临床常规。其结果将有助于进一步确定对于有 TAVI 和 SAVR 适应证的低至中危患者的最佳治疗策略。