Department of Orthodontics, Juiz de Fora Federal University, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Renato Archer Information Technology Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Jan;165(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.025. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
Different types of intraradicular restorations and their insertion have an impact on teeth biomechanics. This study aimed to analyze the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored with glass fiber post (GFP) and cast metal post and core (CMP) subjected to buccolingual and mesiodistal orthodontic forces using the finite element method.
Two models of the maxillary central incisor with periodontal ligament, cortical bone, and trabecular bone were made. One of the models included intraradicular restoration with GFP, whereas, in the other, the incisor was restored with CMP. After creating the tridimensional mesh of finite elements, applying 2 orthodontic forces were simulated: 65 g of buccolingual force and 70 g of mesiodistal force. The forces were applied parallel to the palatal plane in the region of the bracket slot, located 4 mm to the incisal edge.
The maximum stresses generated in the GFP-restored root were 3.642 × 10 MPa and 4.755 × 10 MPa from the buccolingual and mesiodistal forces, respectively. Likewise, the stresses in the CMP restored root were 2.777 × 10MPa and 3.826 × 10MPa. The radicular area with higher stress on both models was located in the cervical third: on the buccal surface when the buccolingual force was applied and on the mesial surface when the mesiodistal force was applied. The highest stress levels were found on the CMP structure.
The incisor restored with cast metal post revealed lower stress values transferred to the root than the one restored with GFP. The stresses on the structure of the GFP were lower and more homogeneous than the ones found on the cast metal post. The difference among the stress values in the materials is within a safe margin for using both materials in relation to orthodontic forces.
不同类型的根管内修复体及其置入方式会影响牙齿的生物力学。本研究旨在通过有限元法分析上颌中切牙用玻璃纤维桩(GFP)和铸造金属桩核(CMP)修复后,在颊舌向和近远中向正畸力作用下的生物力学行为。
制作包含牙周膜、皮质骨和松质骨的上颌中切牙的两种模型。一种模型的根管内修复用 GFP,另一种模型的根管内修复用 CMP。创建三维有限元网格后,模拟施加两种正畸力:65g 的颊舌向力和 70g 的近远中向力。力平行于托槽槽所在的腭平面施加,位于切缘 4mm 处。
GFP 修复根的最大应力分别为 3.642×10MPa 和 4.755×10MPa,来自颊舌向力和近远中向力。同样,CMP 修复根的应力分别为 2.777×10MPa 和 3.826×10MPa。两个模型的根区在较高应力区都位于颈三分之一:颊舌向力作用时在颊面,近远中向力作用时在近中面。CMP 结构的最高应力水平。
用铸造金属桩修复的中切牙向根转移的应力值低于用 GFP 修复的中切牙。GFP 结构的应力低于铸造金属桩的,且更均匀。两种材料的应力值差异在使用这两种材料与正畸力相关时处于安全范围内。