Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Sep;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001525.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe form of lung injury, rendering gaseous exchange insufficient, leading to respiratory failure. Despite over 50 years of research on the treatment of ARDS when developed from illnesses such as sepsis and pneumonia, mortality remains high, and no robust pharmacological treatments exist. The progression of SARS-CoV-2 infections to ARDS during the recent global pandemic led to a surge in the number of clinical trials on the condition. Understandably, this explosion in new research focused on COVID-19 ARDS (CARDS) rather than ARDS when developed from other illnesses, yet differences in pathology between the two conditions mean that optimal treatment for them may be distinct.
The aim of the present work is to assess whether new therapeutic interventions that have been developed for the treatment of CARDS may also hold strong potential in the treatment of ARDS when developed from other illnesses. The study objectives are achieved through a systematic review of clinical trials.
The COVID-19 pandemic led to the identification of various therapeutic interventions for CARDS, some but not all of which are optimal for the management of ARDS. Interventions more suited to CARDS pathology include antithrombotics and biologic agents, such as cytokine inhibitors. Cell-based therapies, on the other hand, show promise in the treatment of both conditions, attributed to their broad mechanisms of action and the overlap in the clinical manifestations of the conditions. A shift towards personalised treatments for both CARDS and ARDS, as reflected through the increasing use of biologics, is also evident.
As ongoing CARDS clinical trials progress, their findings are likely to have important implications that alter the management of ARDS in patients that develop the condition from illnesses other than COVID-19 in the future.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是肺部损伤最严重的形式,导致气体交换不足,引发呼吸衰竭。尽管在治疗脓毒症和肺炎等疾病引发的 ARDS 方面已经进行了 50 多年的研究,但死亡率仍然很高,并且没有有效的药物治疗方法。在最近的全球大流行期间,SARS-CoV-2 感染发展为 ARDS,导致针对该疾病的临床试验数量激增。可以理解的是,大量新的研究都集中在 COVID-19 ARDS(CARDS)上,而不是其他疾病引发的 ARDS,但这两种疾病的病理差异意味着它们的最佳治疗方法可能不同。
本研究旨在评估针对 CARDS 开发的新治疗干预措施是否也可能对其他疾病引发的 ARDS 治疗具有强大的潜力。该研究的目的是通过对临床试验进行系统回顾来实现。
COVID-19 大流行导致了针对 CARDS 的各种治疗干预措施的确定,其中一些干预措施对 ARDS 的管理是最佳的,但并非全部。更适合 CARDS 病理的干预措施包括抗血栓药物和生物制剂,如细胞因子抑制剂。另一方面,细胞疗法在两种疾病的治疗中都显示出希望,这归因于它们广泛的作用机制以及这两种疾病临床表现的重叠。个性化治疗 CARDS 和 ARDS 的趋势也很明显,这反映在生物制剂的使用越来越多。
随着正在进行的 CARDS 临床试验的进展,它们的发现可能会对未来患有非 COVID-19 疾病引发的 ARDS 患者的管理产生重要影响。