Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
Department of Anatomy, Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jun 3;49(6):436-439. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104922.
We compared the spread of an injectate into the thoracic sympathetic chain resulting from a single-injection intertransverse process (ITP) block with that of a single-injection PV block at the T2 level.
Sixteen soft-embalmed cadavers were used. The right hemithorax was randomly allocated to receive either an ultrasound-guided single-injection ITP block or ultrasound-guided single-injection PV block at the T2 vertebral level, with the opposite block administered to the other side. Approximately 10 mL of latex dye solution was injected into each hemithorax using a random allocation technique. The presence of dye at the nerve root in the sympathetic chain and intercostal nerves at the injection and additional levels was examined by dissection.
The injectate spread into the T2 sympathetic ganglion on both ITP (11/16, 68.8%) and PV (16/16, 100%) blocks. The ITP block demonstrated greater uniformity of dye staining in both the dorsal rami and dorsal root ganglion, which contrasts with the less consistent staining outcomes of the PV block in these regions.
At the T2 level, we observed a lower efficacy of the ITP block for analgesic coverage of the sympathetic nerve. This suggested a potential preference by clinicians for the application of the T2 PV block over the ITP block, specifically for the management of sympathetically maintained pain in the upper extremities. In addition, our findings may hint at the potential advantages of the ITP block in specific clinical contexts where targeted nerve involvement, such as the medial branch block or dorsal root ganglion block, is sought.
我们比较了单次经椎间孔(ITP)阻滞和单次经 T2 水平椎旁阻滞注入胸交感神经链的注射液扩散情况。
使用 16 具软尸标本。右侧胸腔随机接受超声引导下单次 ITP 阻滞或 T2 椎旁水平单次注射 PV 阻滞,对侧胸腔接受另一种阻滞。用随机分配技术向每侧胸腔注入约 10ml 乳胶染料溶液。通过解剖检查注射部位和其他水平的神经根和肋间神经处染料的存在情况。
ITP(11/16,68.8%)和 PV(16/16,100%)阻滞均使注射液扩散至 T2 交感神经节。ITP 阻滞在背支和背根神经节的染料染色均匀性更高,而 PV 阻滞在这些区域的染色结果则不一致。
在 T2 水平,我们观察到 ITP 阻滞对交感神经的镇痛覆盖效果较低。这表明临床医生可能更倾向于应用 T2 椎旁 PV 阻滞,而不是 ITP 阻滞,特别是用于治疗上肢的交感维持性疼痛。此外,我们的发现可能暗示了 ITP 阻滞在特定临床情况下的潜在优势,例如需要靶向神经介入时,如内侧支阻滞或背根神经节阻滞。