Department of Physical Therapy for Internal Medicine, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Disorders and Its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 2;18(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04141-5.
This study aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in treating consequences of osteoporosis in hemiparetic patients.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted on hemiplegic patients with osteoporosis. They were randomly classified into three equal groups (n = 40 in each group). The control group received medication and traditional physiotherapy programs for stroke patients. The high-intensity laser (HIL) group received the same intervention as the control group in addition to high-intensity laser therapy. The shock wave (SW) group received the same intervention as the control group in addition to shock wave therapy. The three groups received an intervention that lasted 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks). All groups were assessed before and after therapy for the degree of pain, fall risk, and quality of life.
A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was found concerning VAS, which had a significant difference in favor of HILT and ESWT groups compared to the control group; however, no significant difference was determined between HIL and SW groups. Regarding the overall stability index, SFBBS, and QUALEFFO-41, there was a significant difference in favor of HIL and SW groups compared to the control group, and a significant difference was found in HIL when compared to SW.
The current study indicates that the combined traditional physical therapy and HILT and ESWT have clinical significance in improving osteoporotic long-term hemiparetic patients with more favor to HILT.
The study was registered as a clinical trial at ClinicalTrial.gov ID (NCT05616611).
本研究旨在比较高强度激光疗法(HILT)和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗偏瘫患者骨质疏松症后果的效果。
对骨质疏松症偏瘫患者进行随机对照试验。他们被随机分为三组(每组 40 人)。对照组接受药物治疗和传统的中风患者物理治疗方案。高强度激光(HIL)组除接受与对照组相同的干预外,还接受高强度激光治疗。冲击波(SW)组除接受与对照组相同的干预外,还接受冲击波治疗。三组均接受每周 3 次,共 12 周的干预。所有组在治疗前后都进行了疼痛程度、跌倒风险和生活质量的评估。
在 VAS 方面发现了具有统计学意义的差异(p<0.05),HILT 和 ESWT 组与对照组相比有显著差异;然而,HIL 组和 SW 组之间没有确定显著差异。关于总体稳定性指数、SFBBS 和 QUALEFFO-41,HIL 和 SW 组与对照组相比有显著差异,HIL 组与 SW 组相比也有显著差异。
本研究表明,传统物理治疗联合 HILT 和 ESWT 对改善骨质疏松症长期偏瘫患者具有临床意义,HILT 更具优势。
该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 登记为临床试验(NCT05616611)。