文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

高强度激光治疗与体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效比较:一项双盲随机临床试验。

Comparison of High-intensity Laser Therapy with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine. Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Med Sci. 2024 Mar 1;49(3):147-155. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2023.98042.2991. eCollection 2024 Mar.


DOI:10.30476/IJMS.2023.98042.2991
PMID:38584653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10997849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most common cause of heel pain is plantar fasciitis (PF). Although conservative treatments relieve pain in more than 90% of patients, it may remain painful in some cases. This study aimed to compare High-intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in patients with PF. METHODS: In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial (conducted in Yazd, Iran, from May 2020 to March 2021), patients were classified into two groups, including the ESWT and HILT, using online randomization. Nine sessions, three times a week for 3 weeks, were the treatment period in both groups. Visual Analogue Score (VAS), Heel Tenderness Index (HTI), and the SF36 questionnaire were compared and analyzed statistically at the beginning and 9 months after treatment. RESULTS: 38 patients (19 in each group) completed the study. Results showed that pain and patient satisfaction improved significantly 3 months after treatment. The VAS and HTI decreased 3 months after treatment in both groups, which was statistically significant (P<0.001). The SF36 score in both groups increased 3 months after treatment, and this increase was statistically significant (P<0.001). Although the two modalities were effective based on VAS, HTI, and SF36, a significant statistical difference was observed between them (P=0.03, P=0.006, P=0.002, respectively), and the HILT was more effective. CONCLUSION: ESWT and HILT decrease pain and increase patient satisfaction in PF. Besides, both methods are non-invasive and safe. However, there is a significant difference between them, and HILT is more effective. IRCT20210913052465N1.

摘要

背景:足跟痛最常见的原因是足底筋膜炎(PF)。虽然保守治疗能使超过 90%的患者缓解疼痛,但在某些情况下仍可能持续疼痛。本研究旨在比较高强度激光治疗(HILT)和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在 PF 患者中的疗效。

方法:这是一项在伊朗亚兹德进行的双盲随机临床试验(2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 3 月),患者使用在线随机化分为 ESWT 和 HILT 两组。两组的治疗期均为 9 次,每周 3 次,共 3 周。在治疗前和治疗后 9 个月比较和分析视觉模拟评分(VAS)、足跟压痛指数(HTI)和 SF36 问卷。

结果:38 名患者(每组 19 名)完成了这项研究。结果表明,治疗 3 个月后疼痛和患者满意度显著改善。治疗后 3 个月,两组的 VAS 和 HTI 均降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。治疗后 3 个月,两组的 SF36 评分均升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。尽管两种方法均基于 VAS、HTI 和 SF36 有效,但它们之间存在显著的统计学差异(P=0.03、P=0.006、P=0.002),HILT 更有效。

结论:ESWT 和 HILT 可减轻 PF 患者的疼痛并提高患者满意度。此外,两种方法均为非侵入性和安全的。然而,它们之间存在显著差异,HILT 更有效。IRCT20210913052465N1。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/10997849/46b0d5bd36d4/IJMS-49-147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/10997849/46b0d5bd36d4/IJMS-49-147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/10997849/46b0d5bd36d4/IJMS-49-147-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of High-intensity Laser Therapy with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Iran J Med Sci. 2024-3

[2]
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes of Laser Therapy, Ultrasound Therapy, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017

[3]
The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on plantar fasciitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Rheumatol Int. 2022-4

[4]
Clinical effectiveness of multi-wavelength photobiomodulation therapy as an adjunct to extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Lasers Med Sci. 2019-4

[5]
Effects of adjuvant low-dye Kinesio taping, adjuvant sham taping, or extracorporeal shockwave therapy alone in plantar fasciitis: A randomised double-blind controlled trial.

Int J Clin Pract. 2021-5

[6]
The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial.

Lasers Med Sci. 2018-8

[7]
Efficacies of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis.

Foot Ankle Surg. 2023-4

[8]
Effects of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus high intensity laser therapy in individuals with plantar fasciitis: A randomised clinical trial.

Lasers Med Sci. 2023-5-23

[9]
A Randomised-Controlled Clinical Study Examining the Effect of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) on the Management of Painful Calcaneal Spur with Plantar Fasciitis.

J Clin Med. 2021-10-23

[10]
Sonoelastographic evaluation of plantar fascia after shock wave therapy for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: A 12-month longitudinal follow-up study.

Sci Rep. 2020-2-13

引用本文的文献

[1]
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy versus laser therapy in treating musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lasers Med Sci. 2025-4-15

[2]
Letter to the Editor regarding "Comparison of High-intensity Laser Therapy with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial".

Iran J Med Sci. 2024-10-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Efficacies of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis.

Foot Ankle Surg. 2023-4

[2]
Effect of low-level laser therapy on pain and disability in patients with plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022-2

[3]
A Randomised-Controlled Clinical Study Examining the Effect of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) on the Management of Painful Calcaneal Spur with Plantar Fasciitis.

J Clin Med. 2021-10-23

[4]
The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial.

Clin Rehabil. 2020-8

[5]
The Beneficial Effects of High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Co-Interventions on Musculoskeletal Pain Management: A Systematic Review.

J Lasers Med Sci. 2020

[6]
The effect of high intensity laser therapy in the management of painful calcaneal spur: a double blind, placebo-controlled study.

Lasers Med Sci. 2019-9-3

[7]
Clinical efficacy of low-level laser therapy in plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019-1

[8]
Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018-3-23

[9]
The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial.

Lasers Med Sci. 2018-8

[10]
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes of Laser Therapy, Ultrasound Therapy, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索