Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine. Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Iran J Med Sci. 2024 Mar 1;49(3):147-155. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2023.98042.2991. eCollection 2024 Mar.
BACKGROUND: The most common cause of heel pain is plantar fasciitis (PF). Although conservative treatments relieve pain in more than 90% of patients, it may remain painful in some cases. This study aimed to compare High-intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in patients with PF. METHODS: In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial (conducted in Yazd, Iran, from May 2020 to March 2021), patients were classified into two groups, including the ESWT and HILT, using online randomization. Nine sessions, three times a week for 3 weeks, were the treatment period in both groups. Visual Analogue Score (VAS), Heel Tenderness Index (HTI), and the SF36 questionnaire were compared and analyzed statistically at the beginning and 9 months after treatment. RESULTS: 38 patients (19 in each group) completed the study. Results showed that pain and patient satisfaction improved significantly 3 months after treatment. The VAS and HTI decreased 3 months after treatment in both groups, which was statistically significant (P<0.001). The SF36 score in both groups increased 3 months after treatment, and this increase was statistically significant (P<0.001). Although the two modalities were effective based on VAS, HTI, and SF36, a significant statistical difference was observed between them (P=0.03, P=0.006, P=0.002, respectively), and the HILT was more effective. CONCLUSION: ESWT and HILT decrease pain and increase patient satisfaction in PF. Besides, both methods are non-invasive and safe. However, there is a significant difference between them, and HILT is more effective. IRCT20210913052465N1.
背景:足跟痛最常见的原因是足底筋膜炎(PF)。虽然保守治疗能使超过 90%的患者缓解疼痛,但在某些情况下仍可能持续疼痛。本研究旨在比较高强度激光治疗(HILT)和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在 PF 患者中的疗效。
方法:这是一项在伊朗亚兹德进行的双盲随机临床试验(2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 3 月),患者使用在线随机化分为 ESWT 和 HILT 两组。两组的治疗期均为 9 次,每周 3 次,共 3 周。在治疗前和治疗后 9 个月比较和分析视觉模拟评分(VAS)、足跟压痛指数(HTI)和 SF36 问卷。
结果:38 名患者(每组 19 名)完成了这项研究。结果表明,治疗 3 个月后疼痛和患者满意度显著改善。治疗后 3 个月,两组的 VAS 和 HTI 均降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。治疗后 3 个月,两组的 SF36 评分均升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。尽管两种方法均基于 VAS、HTI 和 SF36 有效,但它们之间存在显著的统计学差异(P=0.03、P=0.006、P=0.002),HILT 更有效。
结论:ESWT 和 HILT 可减轻 PF 患者的疼痛并提高患者满意度。此外,两种方法均为非侵入性和安全的。然而,它们之间存在显著差异,HILT 更有效。IRCT20210913052465N1。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019-1
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018-3-23