Suppr超能文献

植物功能特性解释了人工林和天然草原之间长期存在的生态系统服务差异。

Plant functional traits explain long-term differences in ecosystem services between artificial forests and natural grasslands.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China; College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100083, China.

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118853. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118853. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

Abstract

Declining ecosystem services have prompted numerous studies aiming at developing more sustainable management practices for vegetation restoration. Advances in functional ecology indicate that the sustainable management of afforestation ecosystems should be performed based on plant functional traits, which provides pivotal knowledge for long-term sustainable vegetation restoration. Currently, the mechanism of how plant functional traits affect long term ecosystem services in restored areas is still unclear. This study investigates plant functional traits and the associated ecosystem services from artificial forestlands (Robinia pseudoacacia, Caragana korshinskii) and natural grasslands following different durations of vegetation restoration (10, 20, 30 and 40 years) in the Danangou watershed, a loess hilly-gully region in the Loess Plateau, China. The results showed that 1) the water conservation services of artificial forestlands first decreased and then increased over time, whereas the soil conservation service had an opposite trend; in turn, natural grassland led to a consistent increase in soil conservation and carbon sequestration services over time. 2) Artificial forestlands had greater soil conservation and carbon sequestration services than natural grassland but had lower water conservation services. 3) Leaves had a greater impact on carbon sequestration and water conservation services than did root length and root biomass density. 4) Root biomass density had a greater effect on soil conservation services than did leaf carbon content and soil organic matter. 5) Leaf carbon content, specific root length, and root biomass density had significant effects on the trade-off value between any two ecosystem services with increasing time after restoration of artificial forestland. 6) Specific leaf area had a greater effect on the trade-off values among the three services than did the other functional traits in the natural grassland. In arid ecosystems, natural grasslands are the best restoration strategy given their higher water conservation services. However, in soil erosion-affected areas, restoration through artificial forestlands is more appropriate. To mitigate the trade-offs between ecosystem services, it is recommended that artificial forestlands be thinned before the leaf carbon content, specific root length, and root biomass density reach a maximum (i.e., mature forestland).

摘要

生态系统服务功能不断下降促使人们开展了大量研究,旨在为植被恢复制定更加可持续的管理实践。功能生态学的进展表明,造林生态系统的可持续管理应基于植物功能性状,这为长期可持续植被恢复提供了关键知识。目前,植物功能性状如何影响恢复区的长期生态系统服务功能尚不清楚。本研究以黄土丘陵沟壑区的丹巴沟流域为例,探讨了不同植被恢复时间(10、20、30 和 40 年)的人工林地(刺槐、柠条)和天然草地的植物功能性状及其相关的生态系统服务功能。结果表明:1)人工林地的水源涵养服务功能先降低后升高,而土壤保持服务功能则相反;天然草地的土壤保持和固碳服务功能则呈持续增加的趋势。2)人工林地的土壤保持和固碳服务功能大于天然草地,但水源涵养服务功能小于天然草地。3)叶片对固碳和水源涵养服务功能的影响大于根长和根生物量密度。4)根生物量密度对土壤保持服务功能的影响大于叶片碳含量和土壤有机质。5)随着人工林地恢复时间的增加,叶片碳含量、比根长和根生物量密度对人工林地两种生态系统服务功能之间权衡值的影响显著。6)与其他功能性状相比,比叶面积对天然草地三种服务功能之间的权衡值具有更大的影响。在干旱生态系统中,由于具有更高的水源涵养服务功能,天然草地是最佳的恢复策略。然而,在水土流失严重的地区,人工林的恢复更为合适。为了缓解生态系统服务功能之间的权衡关系,建议在叶片碳含量、比根长和根生物量密度达到最大值(即成熟林分)之前对人工林进行疏伐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验