Enghelmayer Juan I, López Meiller María José, Vallejos Ailín, Felder Federico, Pertuz María Milena, Arias Tamara, Legarreta Cora G, Acuña Silvana, Leiva Sebastián, Barrios Vanesa, Dubinsky Diana
División Neumonología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
División Reumatología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2023 Aug-Sep;19(7):351-357. doi: 10.1016/j.reumae.2022.10.004.
Given the paucity of data in Latin America and especially in Argentina regarding the epidemiology of SSc, the prevalence of ILD, its course, and particularly the response to treatment, our objective was to evaluate a cohort of SSc patients evaluated in a single University Hospital in Buenos Aires.
PATIENTS/METHODS: We included 152 patients with SSc, followed from disease onset to last pulmonary function test and with at least two PFT and up to 30 months between each.
Sixty-one percent had diffuse SSc (DSSc) and 32% limited SSc (LSSc). The only significant clinical differences between these groups were a higher initial mRodnan score and prevalence of ILD in the DSSc. These also had significantly more anti Scl-70 (Topoisomerase 1) antibodies compared to the LSSC group who had significantly more anti centromere antibodies. The DSSc group also had significantly more extensive damage on HRCT with no differences in terms of imaging patterns. Comparing patients with and without ILD by HRCT, those with ILD had significantly more extensive damage, significantly more anti Scl-70 antibodies, and significantly fewer anti centromere antibodies than those without ILD. Patients whose ILD progressed had a smoking history (OR 4.97) and prior immunosuppressive treatment (OR 15.6) (multivariate analysis). Overall disease duration was significantly shorter in those who progressed.
Our SSc population had similar characteristics to those described elsewhere as well as prevalence of ILD and its progression. We found a shorter disease duration, smoking, and prior immunosuppressive treatment to be associated with ILD progression.
鉴于拉丁美洲,尤其是阿根廷在硬皮病(SSc)的流行病学、ILD 的患病率、病程,尤其是治疗反应方面的数据有限,我们的目的是评估布宜诺斯艾利斯的一家大学医院评估的一组 SSc 患者。
患者/方法:我们纳入了 152 例 SSc 患者,从疾病发病开始到最后一次肺功能检查进行随访,两次 PFT 之间的时间间隔最长为 30 个月。
61%的患者为弥漫性系统性硬化症(DSSc),32%为局限性系统性硬化症(LSSc)。这两组之间唯一显著的临床差异是初始 mRodnan 评分较高,ILD 的患病率较高。DSSc 组还具有更高的抗 Scl-70(拓扑异构酶 1)抗体,而 LSSC 组则具有更高的抗着丝粒抗体。DSSc 组在 HRCT 上也具有更广泛的损害,但在成像模式上没有差异。通过 HRCT 比较有和无 ILD 的患者,ILD 患者的损害程度显著更广泛,抗 Scl-70 抗体显著更多,抗着丝粒抗体显著更少。ILD 进展的患者有吸烟史(OR 4.97)和既往免疫抑制治疗史(OR 15.6)(多变量分析)。ILD 进展的患者总体疾病持续时间明显较短。
我们的 SSc 患者人群与其他地方描述的患者人群具有相似的特征,ILD 的患病率及其进展情况也是如此。我们发现疾病持续时间较短、吸烟和既往免疫抑制治疗与 ILD 进展有关。