Magnetic Detection and Imaging Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8735-8742. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14166-z. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
This study investigates the performance of the DiffMag handheld probe (nonlinear magnetometry), to be used for sentinel lymph node detection. Furthermore, the performance of DiffMag is compared with a gamma probe and a first-order magnetometer (Sentimag, linear magnetometry).
The performance of all three probes was evaluated based on longitudinal distance, transverse distance, and resolving power for two tracer volumes. A phantom was developed to investigate the performance of the probes for a clinically relevant situation in the floor of the mouth (FOM).
Considering the longitudinal distance, both DiffMag handheld and Sentimag probe had comparable performance, while the gamma probe was able to detect at least a factor of 10 deeper. Transverse distances of 13, 11, and 51 mm were measured for the small tracer volume by the DiffMag handheld, Sentimag, and the gamma probe, respectively. For the large tracer volume this was 21, 18, and 55 mm, respectively. The full width at half maximum, at 7 mm probe height from the phantom surface, was 14, 12, and 18 mm for the small tracer volume and 15, 18, and 25 mm for the large tracer volume with the DiffMag handheld, Sentimag, and gamma probe, respectively.
With a high resolving power but limited longitudinal distance, the DiffMag handheld probe seems suitable for detecting SLNs which are in close proximity to the primary tumor. In this study, comparable results were shown using linear magnetometry. The gamma probe reached 10 times deeper, but has a lower resolving power compared with the DiffMag handheld probe.
本研究旨在探究 DiffMag 手持式探头(非线性磁强计)在用于前哨淋巴结检测时的性能。此外,还比较了 DiffMag 与伽马探头和一阶磁强计(Sentimag,线性磁强计)的性能。
基于两个示踪剂体积,评估了所有三种探头的纵向距离、横向距离和分辨率性能。开发了一个体模来研究探头在口腔底部(FOM)的临床相关情况下的性能。
考虑到纵向距离,DiffMag 手持式探头和 Sentimag 探头的性能相当,而伽马探头能够探测到至少深 10 倍的位置。小示踪剂体积的横向距离分别为 DiffMag 手持式探头、Sentimag 探头和伽马探头的 13、11 和 51mm。对于大示踪剂体积,这个距离分别为 21、18 和 55mm。在距体模表面 7mm 探头高度处,小示踪剂体积的全宽半最大值分别为 14、12 和 18mm,大示踪剂体积分别为 15、18 和 25mm,为 DiffMag 手持式探头、Sentimag 探头和伽马探头。
DiffMag 手持式探头具有高分辨率但纵向距离有限,似乎适合检测与原发肿瘤密切相关的 SLN。在这项研究中,线性磁强计显示出可比的结果。伽马探头的探测深度可达 10 倍,但与 DiffMag 手持式探头相比,分辨率较低。